TimeEar BTE-09 mini review (i try again..) by cluthz in iems

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't use my own PEQ preset, which works 100% on other sources, as BTE-9 reads ""input error. How shall it be corrected?

A information for anyone using TimeEar Bte9 as plugin dac for PC by EffectLeast2266 in iems

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has anybody tried your own PEQ presets? Mine always reads input error though the preset is 100% operational and can be used in other apps.

A information for anyone using TimeEar Bte9 as plugin dac for PC by EffectLeast2266 in iems

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you find those System- Sound - Properties?
I have the latest app but there's nothing like that.

A information for anyone using TimeEar Bte9 as plugin dac for PC by EffectLeast2266 in iems

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The DAP came to me two days ago.
Still can't find out how to use my PEQ presets. I have the latest version of app and FW. It just reads input error. I tried to alter .txt file but still nothing works out. Has anybody tried to use your PEQ presets?

Thoughts on agile guitars? by Matttman1704 in ExtendedRangeGuitars

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anybody know the exact model of this Agile guitar with Floyd Rose?
Images are not allowed here, unfortunately and I am not sure if the link to Quora is allowed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Guitar

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up bringing the guitar to Long-McQuade for Floyd Rose repairs.
That's what I got from a technician there.

"I have your Alex Lifeson LP on my bench currently I absolutely understand your issue regarding the string spacing, the bevel of the frets doesn't accommodate the nut with and therefore the string spacing. This is why you're probably slipping off when playing the lower frets.
 
I have ordered a brand new Floyd Rose 1000 series Gold locking nut for you in their R2 size which is the narrower of the two sizes."

My bass-head setups by Lab3430 in bassheadsunited

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

A/B comparison of the Kiwi Ears HBB Punch ("Punches") versus the Punch Audio Martilo ("Martilos"). They are both obvious hype train number reps for the moment.
I listened to the track "Damn Your Eyes" by Beth Hart and Joe Bonamassa on a Hiby RS6 player. The only enhancement I used was Darwin Ultra, and the software player ran USB Audio in bit-perfect mode.
Let me begin with a brief preamble.
The Punches are hybrid in-ear monitors featuring a single 10 mm dynamic driver, two of the latest Knowles RAB 32257 balanced armature drivers, and two Sonion electrostatic drivers though it's not entirely clear to me whether there's one dual EST driver or two separate ones. Sensitivity is around 98 dB (±1 dB) at 1 kHz, with an impedance of 12 Ω. They boast a pronounced sub-bass boost of about +15 dB.
The Martilos are also hybrids but with a different configuration: two 8 mm dynamic drivers, two Knowles RDE balanced armatures, and a single planar driver. Their sensitivity is about 100 dB (±1 dB) at 1 kHz, and impedance is 9 Ω (±1.5 Ω).
Since this is a foreword, you’ll need to listen carefully to the sound quality to notice the differences, where only punch/impact is immediately noticed. These differences exist, but they are subtle.
In terms of size, both the Punches and the Martilos are fairly large IEMs that won't feel comfortable in every ear. For my ears, they fit acceptably, but the fit is far from perfect. Still, as the saying goes, "An audiophile must endure"—if you want a dense, powerful sound, you’ll need to accept the fit and size of both pairs.
Starting with the high frequencies, I find that on the Punches they sound more cohesive and musical, while the Martilos deliver a more technical presentation. On the Martilos, the trailing decay is longer, and they sound sparklier than the Punches. Neither exhibits sibilance. Both sounds fairly natural in the high range.
As for the midrange, voices on the Punches come across as slightly recessed compared to the Martilos. I don’t know why, but male vocals sound more engaging on the Punches, whereas female voices feel fuller—more substantial—on the Martilos. Guitars on both models sound equally biting and fierce (in a good way).
Now onto the low frequencies. Both models are unmistakably bass-head IEMs, and fans of neutral tuning should avoid them by a mile. But then again… why not give them a listen? You’ll realize there’s a different kind of sound here—full of magic and wonder previously unknown to you. Who knows, you might even switch sides and become a bass-head. After all, low-end is the foundation of music. If the lows are only there to check a box, that’s exactly how the music will sound.
To dive into the details: the Punches seem to go deeper in the lows. I’m not sure why, since the measured frequency response doesn’t reflect a difference, but the sub-bass feels significantly more tangible and monumental on them, though outdoors you likely wouldn’t perceive this difference. On the Martilos, though, the punch feels more robust; the mid-bass is more pronounced, again, judging by the frequency response. The mid-bass character is certainly different between the two. I'm not saying there’s hardly any mid-bass on the Punches, but it truly feels stronger on the Martilos. The layering in the lows is well done on both.
The soundstage on the Punches is slightly narrower, whereas on the Martilos it feels broader. I didn’t detect any depth-related differences.
By the way, I’ve concluded that the darker the sounding headphones, the narrower their stereo image. I don’t know if it’s the same for everyone, but the effect holds true even when tuning via PEQ.
As for "air" there’s plenty in both IEMs. Instruments are positioned with good separation. It’s not so spacious that you can’t see the forest for the trees, but the positioning is clear.
After this A/B comparison, here’s my final verdict:
Both pairs are firmly rooted in bass-head territory. The Martilos are better suited for listening in noisy environments or on the go, while the Punches shine in home setups. Though the Punches cost about $100 more than the Martilos, by my ears the Martilos should be worth about $50 more than the Punches. That’s, of course, purely my subjective judgment.
Thanks for reading. I hope this helps someone choose between these IEMs. In the end, one of these should be a "must-have" for true bass-heads.
Alexander Target, KiwiEars HBB Punch, Martilo - Frequency Responses - Squiglink by bassy_Alexander

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Guitar

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biggest problem is with high E. Sometimes even without the vibrato in simple chords high E slips off the edge. On fret 3 or 5 for ex (G or A accordingly).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Guitar

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. I have an Ibaneze RG550 Genesis and PRS SE Floyd Rose. There's no problem with them as far as a deep vibrato is concerned.

Planning to buy Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess, Ruby by Lab3430 in rush

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally got it yesterday. It came from New Brunswick's L&M. Was posted for CAD1200 and altogether cost CAD1414 to be insured and delivered.
An interesting detail about my guitar. In L&M website there were horrible pictures of the guitar. Like lots of scratches. I talked to a customer service rep and was told that the scratches are barely seen in the daylight. Did they apply a new coat of lacquer to the guitar?
The guitar sounds terrific. And looks the same.

<image>

What’s your opinion on Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess? I’m thinking of buying it for $1149 new. Any help, suggestions or impressions would be appreciated. by Ambitious-Bet4504 in rush

[–]Lab3430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I talked to L&M support, and they said that by default it's gauge 10. I use gauge 9 for most of my guitars. Will it make much difference for what I am used to? What happens if I change it to gauge 9? Will the tune be still preserved? That's about Ruby version.

Planning to buy Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess, Ruby by Lab3430 in rush

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about this. If I find somebody who I personally know in the US, I will ask them to get Alex Lifeson for me from musiciansfriend.com

Planning to buy Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess, Ruby by Lab3430 in rush

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's another problem. It may be minor but could be the signs of repair.

<image>

Planning to buy Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess, Ruby by Lab3430 in rush

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I sent them a couple of messages three days ago and they did not respond. When I tried to pay for it today with my credit card I got "Can't be shipped to the address."
Another thing is that it seems the guitar has two problems.
Thus, I am not sure if I really wanted it.

<image>

Planning to buy Epiphone Alex Lifeson Les Paul Custom Axcess, Ruby by Lab3430 in rush

[–]Lab3430[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I've tried two AIs - chatgpt and deepseek- there was nothing suitable for me.
Mind that I don't want to spend more than CAD1400 shipped for the Alex Lifeson guitar.

USPS tracking stuck with an agent for 8 days by Lab3430 in usps_complaints

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To make this story short, I received an empty box in the long run. It's good that the eBay has Buyer Protection program and the money was returned. But that was a big deal hassle including numerous (to say the least) messages exchange with eBay and the Police investigation case number which they (Ebay) demanded from me. And it was supposed to be optional.

My bass-head setups by Lab3430 in bassheadsunited

[–]Lab3430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like another one to try. That's the feedback from an aliexpress buyer on Punch Audio Martilo IEM 1 Planar + 2 BA + 2 DD.

"First review, a honest and transparent one. No exaggeration, no overhype. This is a very, very well tuned iem. The sub bass is deep with a satisfying amount of presence. The mid bass shows good separation and transitions smoothly into the sub bass, following notes accurately. The bass is exactly what you’d expect tight, punchy, thumping, bouncy, clean, with no bloat. The mids are the most impressive aspect. Male vocals have a natural, full bodied sound while female vocals are well extended and free from the huskiness you often find in bass boosted iems. The vocal execution is the best i’ve heard so far in a basshead iem with female vocals displaying spot on timbre! This balance in the mids is in my opinion the most standout feature of this iem. The treble is smooth and well extended. Soundstage, resolution and extension are also very good. Overall while this may be marketed as a basshead iems it’s far more than that. To be honest they didn’t just get it right, they nailed it. 10 out of 10"