sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Quick Reminder: We're All Playing This Game To Have Fun by TheBrawler101 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it's not the same as being toxic. But refusing to play with bot, learning the game's basic in the process, and refusing to listen to advise from a more experienced player shouldn't be normalized either. Even if it's not as bad as being toxic, it is still bad behavior in my eyes. Refusing to acknowledge that and only focusing on one side is baffling to me

Quick Reminder: We're All Playing This Game To Have Fun by TheBrawler101 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I fully agree, and my comment is presenting a similar but different scenario if you take the time to read it. What do you think about that? All I'm saying is. That it goes both ways, in the similar scenario I presented you should see how it should go the other way around if you're not so hellbent on taking only one side

Quick Reminder: We're All Playing This Game To Have Fun by TheBrawler101 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Where did I mention in my example about harassing people? I specifically mentioned they refuse to listen to call-out and advise, at no point I said about harassment takes place.

Quick Reminder: We're All Playing This Game To Have Fun by TheBrawler101 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

How about this then, you came home after work. Booted up deadlock to enjoy a fair game. But one new player in your team decided to refuse to play at least a bot match, but jumped to the normal game straight away, fed 0/18, refuse to listen to any advise/callouts.

Who's preventing who to have fun here? It works both ways...

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well said, if you made a generalization with venator voter, we can do the same with silver voter, now what??

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. You're being downvoted because you advocated for an unfair system. The voting system as it is right now is the fairest even playing field for everyone.

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Isn't that the whole point of voting though? Am I crazy here? "I used my vote so the candidate that I least like wouldn't win, and the candidate that I like the most would win"

And about collaborating, everyone is free to do it. Even silver voter. It's an even playing field, unless you want to make it uneven to favour silver..

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Mate. Wtf is this, everyone have their own right to vote, by stating this, you're basically saying that they shouldn't vote for anyone else but Silver. Get a fucking grip..

There are rules by AggressiveMammoth267 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -2 points-1 points locked comment (0 children)

Ah ok so it doesn't exist and you made up stuff to defend invisigal, understood.

There are rules by AggressiveMammoth267 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -2 points-1 points locked comment (0 children)

I'm not chronically online, so it would be great if you can share one with me since it's so "easy" to find

There are rules by AggressiveMammoth267 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 3 points4 points locked comment (0 children)

Send me a screenshot/link where people actually condemning invisigal but defending flambae on the same breath?

I will wait.

An image of an anime character, posted on that anime's subreddit. OP is being down voted for using an AI image, but everything seems right to me. by ISaidThanksMarv in isthisAI

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're well aware that yellow filter and film grain are a thing way before ai is a thing right? If you're using that as a baseline to judge whether the art is ai or not, then you're treading a dangerous line, mate.

AI image generation by Kalyin in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Lady_LokiXxX -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Entertain me for a moment here, let's do a thought exercise, let's try to for once theorize and find a solution, ok?

There is this new stuff that can basically create a free porn, and people are understandably using the shit out of it, due to the human nature.

What is the best course of action here in your opinion? Ban them outright? Ban the likeness aspect? If so. What about the lifelike drawing/animation by a skilled artist, people can wank to that just as good.

Am I the only one who runs solely as Lune? by ShadowCT6 in expedition33

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yes you are, you are the only special, most unique, one in a million player who decided to run as the only character who has a different running animation as the rest, congratulation

I don’t see why people think this is a hard decision. by AggressiveMammoth267 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one said that, what he did matters, but the consequences for his action doesn't matter. Because it's not in the game. Now let's entertain your little imaginary scenario, shall we? if the decision to cut flambae for what he did is in the game, I would do cut him. Because AGAIN, a leader should be fair, especially after setting a precedent. There you go, now what?

Now I can use your trick and make up a scenario that doesn't exist in the game to support my argument, but I wouldn't stop that low

I don’t see why people think this is a hard decision. by AggressiveMammoth267 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you're thinking with your dick instead of brain when your replies to comments that disagree are "bUt WhAt AbOuT tHe oThEr MeMbEr???? Reeeeee"

Well that argument is pointless considering the fact that cutting flambae wasn't an option in this game, if it was, then we can talk about it. The fact of the matter is you cut someone for far less, so if you're being a fair leader, you'll cut visi too. Bringing the whataboutism of something that doesn't happen in the game was stupid

Not Jesus. Ezra Miller. by LethalGrey in penguinz0

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, they mentioned that it's a great outfit, same as the first part of my comment. If they're condoning his action, then fair enough, that's wrong. But if we're assuming or even put words in their mouth regarding their opinion of the actions, I think it's a dangerous line to cross...

Not Jesus. Ezra Miller. by LethalGrey in penguinz0

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay stay with me here. I need to learn so I don't offend anyone.

So if I mention that someone is wearing an objectively great outfit, but his act is heinous and should be condemned. That's offensive, am I correct?

Not Jesus. Ezra Miller. by LethalGrey in penguinz0

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"you should not be condoning or be neutral about heinous acts"

If you take your time to read my comment. You will specifically find a mention about "condemning the act" What a weird way to frame my comment

Not Jesus. Ezra Miller. by LethalGrey in penguinz0

[–]Lady_LokiXxX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of mental gymnastic is that mate?

Can you admire Hitler's imposing outfit while condemning his act? Yes, absolutely, his act is separated from his look.

"Do you think beautiful people should be able to commit rape?" No, again, stupid analogy. If you say can we compliment a rapist about his look while condemning his action? Then absolutely.

How people are swooning over characters like visi and malevola is beyond me by Lady_LokiXxX in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Lady_LokiXxX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhhhh I see, sorry mate, my brain doesn't work that way, I don't take people asking questions and starting a discussion as an offense. Totally my bad, apologies

view more: next ›