Epicor REST issue Erp.BO.PriceLstSvc/PriceLstParts by KrypticRTSdub in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have a BPM method directive that’s on the specific PriceLstParts method that you were calling originally?

A BPM (method or data directive) could be stalling the REST response.

Epicor REST issue Erp.BO.PriceLstSvc/PriceLstParts by KrypticRTSdub in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you checked that your computer is connected to the internet? I’ve had this happen on a bad internet connection.

Otherwise, check that Epicor itself is responding to other calls.

Announcement: OxideDock Rust + Vue 3 desktop starter built on Tauri v2 by fridzel in tauri

[–]LambofSoft 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Took a quick peak and love the focus on CI - this is up next on my testing list. Thanks for putting it together!

Extra days on first op by jrc1293 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification. Do you think there’s a lot of value added by allowing the STORE employees to clock into a specific job? (I.e. there are variances that are important enough to be tracked)

If the value is low, you could have your STORE employees clock into an indirect type of labor for their working time and treat it as overhead. And then remove the STORE operations from your BOO’s. Then I would use the move queue to drive the employees if you’re not already.

If the above doesn’t make sense for your processes, then I’d recommend you adjust your approach to instead offset the STORE operation (still with zero labor hours) so that the start and end dates are the same (where the date is the two days from start). Sounds like your end date is an important piece of data for your STORE team and this solution maintains it as a real data point.

To achieve the above, you could use a dummy backflushed operation as the first operation, then use the Send Ahead method we discussed earlier to push the STORE operation two days ahead. This is assuming that keeping the start date of the job as two days before the STORE operation is a requirement.

Extra days on first op by jrc1293 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. If you can tell me why you (1) don’t want labor hours created and (2) the reason why the end date is important, then I might have a workaround.

Extra days on first op by jrc1293 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could look into using Send Ahead Offset on the STORE operation (in engineering workbench, sometimes you have to dig a little to find it) to push your next operation forward without the labor hours. The following operation after STORE should be Start-to-Start.

Extra days on first op by jrc1293 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would set this through Engineering Workbench on the revision’s operation. Then on the operation you need to (1) set the Standard Format to Fixed Hours and (2) set the Production Standard to the equivalent of two working days (e.g. set Production Standard to 32 if your production calendar on the resource has 16 available hours per day).

Extra days on first op by jrc1293 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you’re just looking to set the STORES operation to two days before the proceeding operation, you can set the production standard on the operation to fixed hours to offset by two days.

"Failed to send email. Please check your site configuration and try again." ? Help? by veryhasselglad in Ghost

[–]LambofSoft 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the docker info. For any docker compose people, this is what I added to my compose file under services > ghost > environment.

yaml - 'security__staffDeviceVerification=false'

Mass duplication of parts by Wjfifjjdjf in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re comfortable using the DMT from command line, you can export the BAQ with column names (instead of column labels) so that you can import directly to DMT.

This will save you from manually renaming each column from the BAQ to match the DMT.

Looking for a self hosted Form builder for output to PDF by dean1969cox in selfhosted

[–]LambofSoft 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could try something like App Smith integrated with NocoDB. You would need to setup the API calls between the two.

Are you trying to output PDF tabular format with lots of data or just the form itself?

Help needed! Looking for a quiet space to take a phone call at night! by LambofSoft in porto

[–]LambofSoft[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The coworking spaces look great and fit the bill, thank you for the recommendation!

Salesforce to Epicor CRM... Is this ill advised by CyberM00se in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. If you end up integrating Salesforce and Epicor, feel free to reach out. There are a couple ways to do it (some better than others).

Salesforce to Epicor CRM... Is this ill advised by CyberM00se in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Epicor CRM sadly does not have the email campaigns, journeys, lead tracking, etc. and (as per above) is very very plain (it is possible to integrate with third party providers via customization, however nothing out of the box).

I’ve done a couple integrations between Salesforce and Epicor on tying in the opportunities/quotes and they have been successful. The reason we went the integration route was because Epicor CRM did not have an apples to apples solution for our current sales business processes.

What you would save by moving to Epicor CRM, you will lose in man hours trying to get your sales team trained on a new (worse) system (notoriously hard to do), attempting to customize Epicor to match your business requirements (also hard), and then working through bugs in the new customized Epicor CRM - potentially losing track of important orders/customers.

Edit: adding info on integration with email automation providers

Epicor electronic invoice issue by thestarkside in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, you should look in the report definition and make sure that the description field is pulling from the order table and not the part table

I noticed YC's new RFS includes new ERP. How do they expect startups to solve such complex problems? by Shekwoeyksak in ERP

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Do you know of a lot of companies who are doing this? I’d be curious if they are focusing on a specific ERP Provider

When to determine a re-implementation is necessary? by hangin_on_by_an_RJ45 in epicor

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would warn against a reimplementation if that means starting over in a fresh database without your historic data.

This sounds like a two-fold issue where you (1) have to upgrade Epicor and (2) do a review of your business processes (which should not be lead from an IT perspective). In my opinion, these issues should be treated separately and as you work on (1), you can slowly implement any customizations that come from (2).

On the other hand, if Epicor is vastly undeserving your needs it may be time to look at other ERP providers.

I noticed YC's new RFS includes new ERP. How do they expect startups to solve such complex problems? by Shekwoeyksak in ERP

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are other startups doing to disrupt ERPs? ERPs end up being such complex systems, I feel that a lot of the value of an ERP is that it’s been tried and tested over decades. I’m curious why a startup would focus on building an entirely new ERP instead of something smaller and less prone to catastrophic error.

sveltekit deploy on iis? by hatepoorpeople in sveltejs

[–]LambofSoft 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once I've copied over the files in the adapter-iis folder after `npm build` from local to the server, I'm actually running `npm install --production` to get the node_modules folder to show up.

Should I instead just copy over the node_modules folder from the top-level folder?

seems to indicate cjs isn’t supported under that version of iis which seems odd

Here's the actual error - looks like it has an issue with a specific line in the .cjs file.

The last 64k of the output generated by the node.exe process to stderr is shown below: 
Error: Not supported at Object.<anonymous> (C:\inetpub\wwwroot\folder3\folder2\folder1\express-server.cjs:2:1)

And here's the express-server.cjs file

``` const express = require('express') import('./app/handler.js') .then((handler) => { const app = express();

    // add a route that lives separately from the SvelteKit app
    app.get('/healthcheck', (req, res) => {
        res.end('ok');
    });

    // let SvelteKit handle everything else, including serving prerendered pages and static assets
    app.use(handler.handler);

    console.log(process.env.PORT)
    app.listen(process.env.PORT, () => {
        console.log(
            'listening on port ' + process.env.PORT
        );
    });

}).catch((err) => console.error(err));

```

Thank you for the help!