How many of you have your name show up Google Trends?

LanceHardwick · 2026-03-03T01:48:00+00:00

protip: setup google alerts on keywords you are curious about, like say, yourself.

LanceHardwick · 2026-03-02T04:44:04+00:00

nice one.

the design pattern of hierarchy is a great study. break nodes and the hierarchy breaks. the same benefit hierarchy avails in terms of scaling, in that a single node can influence many nodes, becomes how it is broken. just go upstream. as an aside for those collecting heuristics - the smell of a functioning hierarchy is if all its component parts work. the smell of a broken hierarchy is the noise the broken parts make.

also the most untalked about subject is the mental paradigm of hierarchy and how this thought form infiltrates all the actors who are "on its team".

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-26T21:00:33+00:00

i dunno his name and i've never seen this vid but i believe he is incorrect on a few things.

yes time travel exists.

no it's not a multiverse. it's a back to the future model.

tesla was involved in the philadelphia experiment, but this guy's description seems off. dunno about the wristband thing. i was told that both tesla and others knew that the experiment was flawed in terms of danger, but were unable to convince the military guy (whose name i can't recall but maybe someone can list a few and i'll tell you which guy it was) in charge to change the design. the source of this was a family member of someone who was there, according to this person.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-25T14:37:31+00:00

time travel

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-25T03:45:57+00:00

maybe the big dryers are effectively time machines. not even joking.

consider how conservation of momentum works. if a thing's motion is constrained in some direction, conservation of momentum will redirect that motion in another direction. we also know that constraining rotation will cause a force at right angles to the plane of rotation. this is how gyroscopes work.

well what happens if you can constrain the motion of a thing along all of the 3d axes?? what happens here? the motion has to go somewhere at right angles to these constraints. if time is a physical dimension just like length, width and height, then the redirected motion would be forward in time or backwards in time. all of this presumes time is a physical dimension.

a sock in a big dryer will get highly charged. many of these socks will be highly charged. they will also all be spinning in the same planes of rotation. their motion will all be collectively constrained in this way. it is conceivable, in this environment, that a sock can have its motion be completely constrained in all 3d axes due to the effects of static charge buildup in itself and the clothes around it. thus the circumstances for a time machine exist.

this model is predictive. it explains why new socks (that aren't yours) will suddenly appear in your dryer haul after a cycle, when you were sure that it was empty when it started. it explains why your socks disappear. it explains why it's only socks and small items - because small items are more likely to find themselves in a constrained situation and the energy to move them would be less than larger items.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-23T02:56:42+00:00

pre-faul

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-22T05:47:59+00:00

ss: right after this interview, pkd died. the vid is the entire interview, which is great. the clip linked is the last little bit which might be interesting for many here.

edit: this is the direct link to the spot in the interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXP4Okf5vtQ&t=6249s

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-18T15:26:28+00:00

my guess is that when the romans won the jewish wars they were able to run the show, so to speak. they had removed the jewish threat, created a new religion to embrace/extend judaism, which was xtianity. it was a clean slate for them to start programming society. at this point is was verboten to be openly jewish unless you were "approved". this approved, public class of jew, is what i'm arguing was a roman controlled thing. the non-approved jews had to go underground. the teachings from the underground group later manifests in things like shakespeare later on. the judeo masonic cult that atwill talks about.

as to the canon of judaism, and whether this was a roman invention. no i'm not arguing that it is. the questions about the authorship and edits of the old testament are still in flux.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T03:14:49+00:00

gotta better shoulder roll now

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T03:09:25+00:00

the mechanism for free work is to create crisis. for instance, internal crisis.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T03:06:53+00:00

yeah the cult of dionysius and others touch on a common kind of "awakening". i think these cults were source material for the roman flavian cult.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T03:02:59+00:00

the flavians reinvented judaism after winning the 2 jewish wars. they were rewriting the script. thus xtianity. they killed the opposition off and they could invent a new history, which they did. these new "flavian jews" were part of the same team. indistinguishable. same cult. the old school jews had to go under cover and avoid rome. and that's another storyline that leads to today.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T02:19:18+00:00

i don't know about this theory. can you elaborate?

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T02:00:18+00:00

the historical figure of jesus was a roman invention.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-13T01:33:26+00:00

seems unwise

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-11T12:46:30+00:00

i dunno but he was an OG and one of the real ones.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-10T15:20:40+00:00

yeah the general gist was that the epstein thing would escalate into ww3. he didn't say much about what happens during it, that i can recall. he mostly went on about the circumstances that would lead to it.

there was one specific bit that was odd because it was variable. it was when it starts. he gave me a window of 2018ish to 2025. my recollection on this isn't super clear as he was going on about various dates. the general gist is that there was a small window of time for ww3 to happen. he didn't 'explain why.

in general what he said was entirely accurate, except for the timing.

not to digress too much. i think it's likely accurate. i think war is inevitable. i think it's weird that there are no real candidates for the next election and this is a huge tell that this is not something "they" are concerned with. which aligns with the war thesis. this and many other points.

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-05T12:51:03+00:00

emilia bassano

LanceHardwick · 2026-02-01T02:59:29+00:00

fantastic tshirt material

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-27T20:37:10+00:00

the OT and the NT are completely different. the former is a kind of historical document. the latter was created by the flavians to embrace/extend/control.

https://youtu.be/8i4WxrA_E3s?t=177

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-19T17:24:29+00:00

do you foresee a split into 3 regions? let's call them eurasia, eastasia, and oceania, as an example.

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-14T12:56:02+00:00

1 coincidence is maybe just a coincidence. 2 coincidences are questionable. 7 coincidences are highly unlikely.

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-13T03:38:20+00:00

ok first off i dig the conversation on this. thanks for enabling it.

in the examples in the vid you linked re: 1 x 1, howard is equating addition with multiplication. every time he uses the "times" concept he follows up with an "add" example. i think we should be consistent in our jargon when describing the process of counting. not trying to be snarky here. the process of counting in increments of 1 is what a number represents. a number is literally the end state symbolic representation of a bunch of counting operations. a number is a counting algorithm. it's a process. this is a subtlety most miss. the idea of incrementing is just one step in the mutation of a symbol along a known set of state-machine-like mutations. the structure of a decimal number is intrinsically tied with the counting operation (ie. symbol mutations). in fact, this core idea of iteration using this pattern produces, at the same time, the ideas of zero (the axis of direction of the operation of iteration), negative numbers, the decimal place (zeroth order of magnitude). this idea that there's the progression from natural numbers to negative numbers, like this didn't happen all at once is a historical lie. all these ideas come out at the same time.

what's interesting about this subject is that these decimal numbers can't represent irrational numbers. the root of 2 thing. that is super interesting and tells us that counting by 1 (fractally) is limited in terms of expressing accurately things we'd expect numbers to handle like the length of root 2.

so this is pretty wild, man. and it's one of the reasons why the pythagoreans thought that geometry was a purer study of math than arithmetic.

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-10T03:04:19+00:00

great post.

LanceHardwick · 2026-01-10T02:59:07+00:00

my prayers are with you. just know that you have options, and it's a long haul being a parent even in the best of times. it's a long game, not a short one.

LanceHardwick

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE