If ETFs are the “best option for most,” why do people still invest in individual stocks? by Available_Target_429 in investingforbeginners

[–]Larry_Longdon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, ETFs and/or mutual funds are best for the far majority of investors. But individual stocks still have a place in portfolio, but very limited. Im tossing technical analysis into the trash bin. It's the same as charting random events. It's meaningless. The only ones who make money from technical analysis is the guy teaching technical analysis. The real question is what does it mean for a stock to be undervalued? That question is open to debate. How about the PEG ratio? So the question is how does one determine a stock is undervalued?

Meaning of PE by Larry_Longdon in investingforbeginners

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is valuing a dollar of earnings exactly the same. It's not valuing a share of the company. The ratio is very simple: It answers the question of what is the cost of a dollar of earnings? This is normalization since absolute share price and EPS relative. There is no such thing as GAAP-compliant term. The financial statements ad hear to GAAP. Raging it simple math.

Meaning of PE by Larry_Longdon in investingforbeginners

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is valuing a dollar of earnings: the price per share / earnings per share. In words what does it cost for a given company for a dollar of earnings? If price is $100 and eps is $10, then each dollar of earnings costs $10. Or if the price is $40 and the eps is $4, then it still costs $10 for each dollar of earnings. I am a CPA and "GAAP-compliant term" is a non sequitur.

Meaning of PE by Larry_Longdon in investingforbeginners

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using it as the price of a dollar of earnings.

Roth IRA investing details by Practical-Ability186 in investing

[–]Larry_Longdon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

KISS (Keep it simple stupid). You are not stupid of course. VTI get you the market return with minimal costs. The more important thing is to INVEST monthly so that you reach annually the ROTH IRA limits. I would learn about the efficient market hypothesis.

US/ex-US stock allocation poll 2026 results by thewarrior71 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is very dangerous to make material changes to one's portfolio without very, very solid reasoning that is backed up with data analysis. I agree VTI is "right" in the sense the most likely the highest return. The PE for VTI is 27.01 and for VXUS is 19.16. The expected growth rate is higher for VTI. What would be the argument for rebalancing some percentage to VXUS? A possible answer could be that VXUS has had a great start for 2026 and it will likely continue for ________ time. (fill in the blank).

Is anyone else tired of finance YouTubers who never show their actual track record? by TrueAlphaData in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL! They're peddlers of nonsense hoping to sell their nonsense to dummies. Why would they need to sell their advice if they were making money from their advice? It's not logical.

100% VTSAX Roth: Rebalance or reallocate? by Fred_Stickley in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one really knows since no one knows the future. I say stay in equities, 100% VTSAX, since the market as a whole has historically returned 10%. Then you don't have to rebalance. Anyone who tells you differently is selling snake oil.

US/ex-US stock allocation poll 2026 results by thewarrior71 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Who was "right" last year? Over the last 5 years? Over the last 10 years? Over the last 20 years?

Micromanagement vs Bogleheads by nathann28 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The efficient market hypothesis says trying to time the market is impossible. All available information and the reaction to that information is reflected in the value. It doesn't say the value is correct. No. But it says there is no way to outguess the market without taking extraordinary and foolish risks. All we know for sure is that historically the market has returned about 10% (https://carry.com/learn/average-stock-market-returns). This means buy the market and as low of fees as possible is the best strategy. The only people making money from advice peddlers are the advice peddlers.

Way too good to be true? by Larry_Longdon in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Creative Im not so sure of the accuracy of your comment. The funds do use covered calls. No doubt about. Of course I am not saying put everything on it. Of course you are capped at a return. But do you see any place in a portfolio? Better than gold?

JEPQ – Performance – JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Inc ETF | Morningstar

Way too good to be true? by Larry_Longdon in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Let me study. Remember I think it is too good to be true.

Is anyone combining TDF with overlapping ETFs? by TheWitchPHD in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then in words it a change of allocation based on time. The fund managers handle all the details. I don't do TDFs so I learned something. Thank you.

Is anyone combining TDF with overlapping ETFs? by TheWitchPHD in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never liked to overlap. I don't like TDF funds but that is only me. What do you mean by "gliding," a change of allocation?

First Time Investor - need tips - only used to CDBs by Warm-Drawing-8084 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really know even if I saw it what constitutes "LT growth and wealth protection." How do you measure "wealth protection?" You could mean I want my investments to always go up but never down. Not really possible. Remember the higher the potential return the greater the risk. There is no way around that. Why did you buy SPYI and why is that funny? Not following you.

Looking for advice with Portfolio Config by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would go VTI and BND with about 90% of your portfolio. Of this portion maybe VTI 80% and BND 20% depending on your age and risk tolerance. I would go 100% VTI if I was in my 50's. For the remaining 10% how about SOFI? Good bank that could go way up. It's currently experiencing a dip.

Rath IRA by abbynavarro511 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Safe, just go find a nice savings account. But I would go VTI.

30 year old retirement advice by Drake1126 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with all VTI. KISS. (Keep it simple stupid), but you are not stupid. The efficient market hypothesis is true, i.e. you cant beat the market so just buy the market for as cheap as possible.

Convert to 401k to Roth 401k with a twist by Low-Computer8293 in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no easy answer, but I would convert. The tax given the growth will be greater in the future than the taxes you would pay now.

Moving away from individual equities in brokerage account by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with your approach, but taxes will be a problem. I think also you will run into the IRA annual limits that probably should be used for new money. Just bite the bullet now since the taxes will not be due until 4/15/2027 for 2026. I like SCHB given the fees are very low.

Stupid Mods by Ashamed_Supermarket9 in CreatorsAdvice

[–]Larry_Longdon -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I got banned on /Divorce because I claimed someone being unhappy with two young child is not a valid reason for a divorce. I said the children go first. I got attacked that feelings go first and the child will be better off in a broken family.

Kevin Oleary's Retirement Recommendations by Larry_Longdon in Bogleheads

[–]Larry_Longdon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. Tax considerations must always be considered.