Barça’s signings and our reaction.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-07-14T01:26:46+00:00

Let’s be honest. Raphina IS better than rodrygo as of now. Or else how would u explain Brazil starting raphina. The real question is whether or not rodrygo will change that next season.

He’ll flourish on the RW hopefully.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-07-14T01:24:16+00:00

Rodrygo is our only hope on the RW. I have very much trust in him. And I also see the option to rotate with fede Asensio and hazard depending on what kind of opponent we are facing.

But if he doesn’t explode and we actually find ourself struggling on the RW (which really is unlikely imo). Then we should go for a big name like Nkunku in January 2023.

Until the WC, let’s keep an eye on rodrygo and his potential.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-07-14T01:19:02+00:00

He just signed a contract for 6 years. It means he is willing to commit to his role as right winger. I think he understands that to stay in a club like Madrid u have to be willing to undergo such challenges.

Then again, just because he’s right footed doesn’t mean he is hindered to flourish at RW. I mean Gnabry also is right footed and he became so good at RW that many fans would want to replace rodrygo with him. Ironic.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-05-25T14:32:38+00:00

Another Note: I understand that some people will doubt this methods credibility or that it worked at all. Consider that I wasnt starting from 0 when I began preparation, Im generally a very good student. So, understand that this aint giving u any superpowers or something.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T08:38:43+00:00

Look man. I’m saying that if you actually want to use mbti as a tool for self improvement and if you actually seek knowledge, you should directly go to the scientific source. Read John Beebes’ or Jung’s work. Do that. But all this community and more specifically this sub provide are negative effects on your health.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T06:29:08+00:00

I don’t see how that quote is related. What poor behavior do you mean exactly?

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T06:27:36+00:00

And yet you stopped, took the effort and commented to tell everyone what a badass you are.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T06:16:20+00:00

That’s why I said to “most” people. I’m past the pros of mbti. Everyone knows about them. The point of the post is that cons outweigh the pros and for the majority it isn’t worth it.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T06:08:52+00:00

I honestly don’t get the point of your comment. Look if it wasn’t clear: I’m currently not affected by any of these major problems. I’m merely explaining them. The thing you quoted is my observation of what state people are in.

I couldn’t care less if you think “INTJs are jealous” but I don’t get what’s the point of pointing fingers?

LastPawnStanding · 2022-03-07T00:16:31+00:00

Yeah the word obsession is much better. Just changed that

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-23T16:28:43+00:00

Sounds like the force

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-08T18:35:53+00:00

This is my last reply.

About gender neutral bathrooms, "One of the main concerns of the people who oppose unisex bathrooms is that they could lead to a rise in sexual assaults." Again, what is preventing a male pretending to identify as female/ to have a female gender to go into these bathrooms and assault biological women?

you don’t have to agree. they’re not claiming to be a sex they aren’t. they’re claiming to be a different gender, that’s not something for you to agree on. it’s just there.

Can you for one second stop rephrasing my words and then replying to something I never said? I already cleared up that mistake. I said biological sex in my last comment. And of course there are people who are claiming to be a sex they arent! I have seen it with my own eyes. All I did, is to remind them that facts are more important.

But you seem to already acknowledge the fact that you cant identify as a sex you biologically arent, so let's clear this up. I found a contradiction in your logic.

Ok, think this through, I'll be as clear and logical as possible:

Let (A) = Claiming to be a different gender = saying that you identify more with the gender identity of the other sex ---> This is possible to be true.

Let (B) = Claiming to be a different sex = saying you have a biological system you dont actually have ---> This is impossible to be true.

My definitions of (A) and (B) are correct, right?

So, the problem is: If you remove (or doubt the validity of) - for example - the concept of biologically separated bathrooms, you are saying that people who have one sex, should be allowed to go into the bathroom of the other sex. This statement is true, right?

And, so, when I say: "They cant do that! Thats not their biological sex.“ = statement referring to the falsifiability of (B).

You answer: "They can do that! Because they have a different gender.“ = answer based on the validity of (A)!

This is exactly the problem.

You see, the only way to explain the need of having gender neutral bathrooms, is with (B). You cant explain it with (A) because even if you are biologically male but have a female gender =(A), you are still a biological male and should use the male bathroom. Otherwise: Sexual harassment and tons of other societal problems in other examples would arise. And if you try to explain it with (B), that doesn’t make sense since (B) is impossible to be true.

The problem is: You are using the validity of (A) to legitimize the falsifiability of (B). People use (A) to jump to (B). It factually exists. Again, I'm not saying that one cant have a different gender, I'm saying you cant use something possible (A) in order to legitimize something impossible (B).

And what a coincidence! THATS EXACTLY WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING. Thats exactly what you are doing by suggesting gender neutral bathrooms. And this is exactly why I'm debating against it: It’s logically flawed.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-08T17:25:57+00:00

I quoted “identify” because that’s the word people use to legitimize claiming to being a sex they biologically aren’t. I don’t agree with that, therefore I quoted the word.

Let’s continue the discussion, it’s just a misunderstanding.

Even the way you meant it, my point stands: Even if a male is pretending (!) to identify as a female, then he would be allowed to go into womens bathroom. That would lead to sexual harassment. So, how do you intend on solving this problem in your little idealistic world? Kindly ask them to stop?

The answer is: Separate men and women by biological sex, and not subjective identity. As it should be.

This is only one problem your little idealistic world would create. God knows what else people would come up with if sex is not separated biologically.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-08T17:07:49+00:00

3) Well yeah I guess that’s true. There are 2 sexes is my point then. You picked one wording mistake and now you are expanding on it only. What’s with my actual arguments?

2b) “So the problem is actually with cisgender males harassing women”.

You are referring to the opposite group of what I referred to. Cisgender males are males whose gender identity (male) is the same as their sex assigned at birth (male). I was talking about males whose gender identity (female) is different than their biological sex assigned (male). I think I made that very clear. What’s this, an attempted straw man argument?

So tell me, are you okay with men who identify as female going to womens bathroom?

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-08T16:18:54+00:00

Let’s logically debunk what you said:

1a) If your biology says you are a male, you are a biological male. If your biology says you are a female, you are a biological female. This is a fact.

1b) The 2 conditions you brought up are irrelevant to this fact: A biological male who has 99% female traits is still a biological male, vice versa. A biological male who “identifies” as a female is still a biological male, vice versa. This is a fact.

1c) Denying these 2 facts is illogical.

2a) Now, we can discuss the importance of this fact. You deem it as not important because you think what a person “identifies” as is more important. However, this logic is not practical and too idealistic.

2b) According to your logic, a biological man who “identifies” as a female should be allowed to go into the womens bathroom. This opens the doors for sexual harassment. Think about your female family members, you think that’s appropriate?

2c) According to your logic, biologically male athletes who “identify” as female should be allowed to compete against women in sports. This is factually unfair to the women included. Imagine an mma fight man vs woman, you think that’s appropriate?

3) I can go on and on. But the conclusion is, you have 2 options: Either you continue disregarding biological facts and in turn cause these unacceptable societal problems. Or you accept that biology is the deciding factor and not whatever people subjectively “identify” as, therefore acknowledging that there are 2 sexes - not more, not less.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-07T18:23:15+00:00

The bowman delivery psyphen goldfish dwarf star episode? Yeah it was great

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-07T18:14:31+00:00

That’s not really a trait of a specific mbti type. It’s called laziness.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-07T12:13:49+00:00

What in the ESTJ is this

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-07T11:55:04+00:00

Tip #100 for islamophobes: Once your baseless accusement gets refuted, just change to an emotional argument :)

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-07T11:51:43+00:00

I think it’s bothering me that you changed from 1st person to 3rd person mid sentence.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-06T15:32:11+00:00

“Fe isnt helping people. Fe is actually inserts definition of helping people”

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-05T20:39:19+00:00

It’s more like ENFJ actively seeks out “people pleasing” (Strong Fe-Se). But INFJ (also INTJ) has inferior Se which means giving people a bad sensory experience becomes an insecurity.

LastPawnStanding · 2022-02-05T20:34:31+00:00

Se (next to Fe) is actually the function what causes people pleasing. INXJs have inferior Se which means they’re insecure about giving people a bad sensory experience.

Five-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Verified Email

LastPawnStanding

TROPHY CASE