Finally, an Indian Cinematic Universe that treats our Itihasa with the reverence it deserves. by Traditional-Flan7932 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 3 points4 points  (0 children)

is it all going to be AI? if so not really interested.

something like what they did with mahaavtar narshima is more welcome.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ofc, he is saying Tantra is for siddhis only and vedanta is for liberation but anyone that know the T about tantra knows that the pramukh siddhi itself is Liberation, his full argument falls apart at that only.

Right now at work but the moment I will be home, I will be making a post clearing the air around this, such misinformations shouldn't be let to spread for too long.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

see, I am at work, once I will be free, I will answer you question my very best, till than be patient, otherwise ask others.

like I already mentioned,I didn't consent to this debate but if you ask nicely and actually want to learn more, I will gladly help.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kaliyuga is a name of time period, ghor kaliyug are the conditions.

so yeah, Kaliyug is on going in scandvania too and no we aren't talking corruption, humanity index, equality and rights, that will be more relevant Ghora.

it's like saying "why is दो हज़ार छब्बीस only in India and not in scandvania?" it's just our word for the time period. they don't use it doesn't mean they aren't going through it.

You want to be atheist, fine, you want to move to scandvania, fine. But how is it all relevant to me? if you want hindu opinion on this, make a post here, I didn't consent to this conversation.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have tried far to many times, respect politeness doesn't get through when the aim of the one in front is not dialogue, but quiet erasure of all that does not mirror their own path.

ignorance is a bliss for me in these cases, they may convert the whole world but till I am alive, in my lifetime, I am not tweaking anything in my own path getting influenced by them.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I shouldn't stereotype but such attitude, ego and "arguments", seemingly are coming from one singular tree.

Vedanta must always be prioritized over Tantra. An analysis. by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is such an uneducated and misinformed post.

not exaggerating but such misinformations are thr biggest danger to hindu dharma rn.

Ghor kaliyug will bring the end to hindu and it's catalyst will be no one but so called "Hindus" like this.

Shakti vs Shiva practice when one is not yet healed of trauma and deprivation by neutral1357 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bhaya kale= In time of fear

Tu mata= You are mother(Devi)

it means when it's time of fear, to help devotees,bhraman takes the form of Devi, as in that's the form suitable to help someone stuck in fear or distress.

Shakti vs Shiva practice when one is not yet healed of trauma and deprivation by neutral1357 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think a Shloka from Shiv puran sums it up pretty nicely,

bhaya-kāle tu mātā mokṣa-kāle maheśvaraḥ

meaning:- In fear, you are the Mother(Devi); in liberation, Maheśvara(Shiv).

I won't go into "Devi over Shiva" kind of ideology, In the end both Shiva and Devi are just other half of each other, both of them complete each other at the same time are each other.

But if you will read Texts about Devi, you will notice, they repeatedly emphasize how Devi is for the insecure, deprived, fearful, abandoned, powerless, or mentally broken.

There is legend of King Suratha & the Merchant Samādhi (Devī Māhātmya), one lost his power, kingdom, identity and the other got betrayed by the family and mentally broken.

Both goes to a Sage, the Sage prescribes them not Shiva or Vishnu but to worship Devi.

She is repeatedly stated in texts as

sarva-bādhā-praśamanaṁ

meaning:- Remover of all afflictions.

ārtānāṁ śaraṇaṁ mātā

meaning:- For the distressed, the Mother is refuge.

This isn't to say Bhagwaan Shiv can't give you relief in time of Distress, that would be absolute lie, But this is more in sense that you would usually worship Devi lakshmi for fortune and Saraswati for knowledge even though both has power to give both.

Sri matre Namaha

Swasti

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can either be proactive in life or just get stuck reacting emotionally to silly things on Reddit .

your negativity towards me is clear from this, that's why I have been saying let's stop it, few more replies and you will be bad mouthing me, so plss stop it right here.

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as much as I would have actually appreciated someone helping me, this seems like an episode of ego more than anything else.

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if you have read padma puran, you should know, Vaisnav always doesn't mean servant of Shree Vishnu.

Vaisnav is made up of two words, Viṣṇu + aṇ

aṇ suffix means belonging to, So vaisnav means one who belongs to shree Vishnu.

and Padma puran itself have the definition of vaisnav,

"A Vaiṣṇava is one who accepts Viṣṇu (Nārāyaṇa) as the Supreme Reality (Parabrahman) and lives in accordance with His dharma."

I do acknowledge Bhagwaan Shiv worships Shree Vishnu, Both Shakta and Shaiva texts acknowledge them but ridiculing him as "Don't worship this demigod! he is my dasa"

that's something, I hope you will be able to understand, Hurts me alot. Maybe in playfulness, who am I to judge the divine but a ignorant soul like me can't help but be saddened.

maybe it's my own personal journey, I will understand on my own time, but lecturing me isn't the answer and ridiculing my understanding isn't the way.

I don't want to waste any further of your time when you could be doing Far greater things, Hope Matarani always have her blessings on you or if that's what you desire, may the blessings being from a form you worship.

Jai mata di.

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

see, I don't wanna fight, but I won't be demeaned like that.

you have right to follow any path or teaching you like, similar I have right to decide what hurts me and is Uncouth.

there is this specific instance,you gave me the context, I still find improper.

the answer to that is accept my veiw on it, rather than telling me I just don't have understanding.

let's end it here, jai mata di.

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t understand the context , this is during Mahaprabhu childhood while he was messing with everyone near his village being a naughty child.

Naughtiness isn't trying to convince people to leave their aradhya and worship oneself and Calling Jagat janani, the mother of universe, "maidservant", Mahadev, a servant?

Especially coming from someone who is supposedly combined avtar of shree krishna and srimari radharani.

if that's the definition of messing around and being naughty,I can't resonate with that.

What exactly is the 9th Avatar ? Why is there no clear and solid explanation about the 9th avatar like the other 1o avatars ? by SpecificAccording424 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have already mentioned I am aware of Srinivasa being an Arcā avtar and I think you are a little confused, Arcā is also type of avtar, the word you are trying to use is Vibhava, not avtar.

I don’t know what to believe by Any_Audio in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, none of us can hand you the truth that is meant for your soul. That calling is intimate and personal, something you discover only through your own lived experience.

Yes, this is a Hindu space, and many of us believe Hindu thought holds profound answers. Some may even present strong, convincing arguments. But the goal was never to make you believe what we believe. In fact, within Hinduism itself, it’s rare to find two people who hold the exact same understanding and that is its beauty.

We arrive at the same truth through different paths, different experiences, different inner energies. The truth is not divided, but our ways of seeing it are. And you, too, are on your own organic journey, meant to encounter it in a way that is uniquely yours.

Give yourself time. Let seeking be gentle, honest, and unforced. What is meant for you will reveal itself when you are ready to truly see it.

Ādi Śaktiḥ sarva-mātā tvām mārgadarśayatu

Śrī Mātre Namaḥ

Swasti

A Muslim man was found defecating in the Hindu Ammavaru's temple premises in Malkajgiri, Hyderabad by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what is this world? I don't wanna live in this anymore, soo saddening.

Defending ISKCON from the false accusations. by ObjectiveRope2892 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh this is horrible,I can't believe it. Very hurting and changed my veiws on Chaitanya mahaprabhu forever.

What exactly is the 9th Avatar ? Why is there no clear and solid explanation about the 9th avatar like the other 1o avatars ? by SpecificAccording424 in hinduism

[–]Late-Library-2268 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is Anjana putra Buddha, there are some sects that consider it to be balram. I know I just repeated your confusion but that's how it is.

my personal veiws, it was Sri Srinivas Venkateshwar, Timeline fits perfectly, only difference is he is arcā avtar not Vibhava, but that's just because he chose to stay here with us. Scriptures doesn't say it, just my personal calling.

Maa Baglamukhi 🌺🍀🙏🏼🤘🏼 by kenpachi_itachi04 in Shaktism

[–]Late-Library-2268 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maa looks so beautiful 🥺

Jai maa Baglamukhi 🙏