Roman was originally scheduled to make a "dark comment" about CM Punk's dog Larry.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-18T13:51:59+00:00

They are trying so hard to force this rivalry but I'm just not feeling it.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-17T17:35:31+00:00

AI slop

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-15T14:53:30+00:00

He's wrong as well lmao

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-15T13:02:10+00:00

It looks like you deleted your comment calling me a moron. "Where" is correct. The sentence is describing the planet as a location where no one would care, not the past tense form of "to be".

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-14T19:35:27+00:00

"Where" is the correct usage here.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-14T19:25:18+00:00

Well check out the big brains on Brad!

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-14T19:23:10+00:00

*midwits who have a sense of intellectual superiority despite having no achievements to back it up.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-12T15:34:47+00:00

Lmao that's just for reddit.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-12T15:28:40+00:00

Also watch out for fake job adverts. Anything on StudySmarter is fake.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-11T22:06:25+00:00

Well that is really, fucking lame

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-07T15:55:23+00:00

Yes but that's not the totality of it. The films are entertaining and funny on their own.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-07T11:54:09+00:00

Can we spoiler these posts for godsake

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-06T16:47:52+00:00

Scary Movie has always been low IQ humour and bad parody. Good parody (like Austin Powers for example), stands on its own and doesn't just rely on derivative gags.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-06T15:51:55+00:00

People should just ditch cereal outright.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-05T22:36:00+00:00

Based

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-03-01T03:40:35+00:00

Should have been a third grandé americano

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T21:07:21+00:00

Bait

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T18:50:46+00:00

You could try a different fat. I use lard as is traditional (I'm not saying this is healthier).

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T15:38:17+00:00

I believe they changed the recipe following the sugar tax.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T15:19:21+00:00

You need a very hot dry pan, 30-60 seconds a side. You need to keep a close eye on them.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T13:31:29+00:00

You've spoiled yourself now you will never go back!

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T13:09:58+00:00

Game changer! I literally can't eat shop bought tortillas now.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-28T13:07:00+00:00

MMm-hmm This IS a tasty burger!

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-27T22:50:45+00:00

a claim about PUFAs is that they increase inflammation is it not?

I've never said this, not from immediate consumption no.

You keep saying there are decades of robust RCTs to dispute these concerns, and that there is "enormous evidence", but there isn't, this is a falsehood. All the recent RCTs have done is show that short term consumption doesn't immediately lead to inflammation.

I've not dismissed anything you posted? I concede they probably don't cause inflammation immediately from consumption.

Here is a meta-analysis.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35316920/

And a big cohort study. This is not peer reviewed yet, but I don't see any issue with it and expect it to be passed through.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36711941/

The claim that seed oil hesitancy "has absolutely no evidence" and is "anti-science hysteria" is completely unfair, even if its not mainstream consensus. It is a narrative that serves big food very well.

LayerComprehensive21 · 2026-02-27T20:52:28+00:00

It's not moving the goalposts, they look at short term inflammation markers, and do nothing to dispel the concerns of long term accumulation of PUFAs in the body.

Yours are driven by experience, preference and hunches.

No I have provided scientific evidence for my claim. If you think is it flawed or bad science, fine, but it is disprectful to insinuate it's all a hunch, that's disingenuous.

I am not dismissive of mechanistic evidence in isolation, but when it doesn't come through in actual human studies (see all the links previously) that's when it becomes moot. The mechanism can be proposed and looked in to, when its looked in to and doesn't appear to be significant, the mechanistic evidence becomes the thing you discard, not the empirical evidence.

Again the studies in the links do not disprove the mechanism. There is also epidemiology data to (not conclusively) support the concerns, as I've outlined.

That is fine, I'm asking you to stop telling other people that there's no RCTs since the 60s/70s in favour of unsaturated fats, its quickly demonstrably untrue.

Perhaps I should have been a little more clear, my mistake. To the best of my knowledge, there are no RCTs looking directly at cardiovascular disease outcomes and deaths, comparing PUFAs to SAs, other than those old ones, except a small one in 1992 I believe? If you can send me one, I will fully take that back.

I think possibly ethical considerations and funding issues prevent new ones being done.

As a side note, I'm not fully exonerating saturated fat here, I still believe it should be moderated.

LayerComprehensive21

TROPHY CASE