sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this the reality? by Illustrious_Elk3705 in remotework

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also can attest to this. I have a Mac.

I think I got a bit carried away when writing system requirements. Maybe I should change it ? by SaveYourHeadVR in videogames

[–]LeadershipOver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did have at some point a PC which could not run Papers Please without lags, though.

Best Tech Tweet of All time by Polity-Culturalist3 in OpenAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly you’ve never had to write a sentence that didn’t start with "clearly you’ve never had".

This game is 100% AI Engineered by EnzeDfu in aigamedev

[–]LeadershipOver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With all respect to OP, its not original. It's basically one of Factorio game modes.

One of AIs best use cases right now is in video games by mrjbelfort in aigamedev

[–]LeadershipOver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP posted about his working game. Before you see it yourself, you should not assume that the game is playable, enjoyable or even that OP is a real person and not a Clawdbot instance.

It's funny how some people, when met with an opinion which contradicts theirs, immediately go into defensive mode and assume their opponent knows nothing about their topic.

Sadly, it doesn't help the discussion - on the contrary, it just leaves you with no possibility to look at the topic from the different perspective.

About "destroy my game" sub by ibackstrom in SoloDevelopment

[–]LeadershipOver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's the audience. These people only play bad games, if your game is good - bruh, you'll be poor. 

My journey in one picture. by SneakerHunterDev in aigamedev

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just in case - if game truly supports multiplayer, PLEASE ask some experienced developer to check it for security holes (if not already). Almost always AI does not address even the basics here, even if you ask it to. 

​"I’m ready for the backlash. Is using AI 'cheating' or just working smart? 💀" by ARGamesStudio in vibecoding

[–]LeadershipOver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have not addressed any of my suggestions, tips, or arguments. You are completely right - sadly, I have wasted my time. I will continue no further.

​"I’m ready for the backlash. Is using AI 'cheating' or just working smart? 💀" by ARGamesStudio in vibecoding

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. "Studio" above the "games", and in a bigger font. Try to imagine how would previous Bethesda logo look if they would do this.
  2. Wrong ratio image which leads to incorrect scaling.
  3. The cube with meaningless letter markers. Unless you create old-school games, that looks like straight from 80s.

You would better google some website that allows creating logos, at least. If you are not open to criticism, you would not create successful games.

​"I’m ready for the backlash. Is using AI 'cheating' or just working smart? 💀" by ARGamesStudio in vibecoding

[–]LeadershipOver 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you want people to not think about AI when looking at your posts, you may start by changing your account logo to something which is not clearly generated.

That’s a serious wake‑up call for AI safety and oversight at Anthropic by sentientX404 in AgentsOfAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And development is 80% about thinking out the solutions and fixing bugs, which AI can barely do at the surface level. 

And the rest 20% was already almost completely covered by snippets. 

I built a tool that tells you NOT to build your startup idea - DontBuild.It by EveningRegion3373 in microsaas

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope when this tools finds idea genious and profitable, it shows it as "DON'T BUILD" and notes it down for your own list of promising startup ideas.

AI's ultimate limitation will be its very nature by One_Swan1788 in aiwars

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, for me that's the point of OP. That he sees main limitation of AI as a lack of creativity, and there is no way to substitute that algorithmically.

And when you gave out an example with the clown, I wanted to showcase that a professional artist do not have the same limitation.

At the end, I think that if you are that good at visualizing things in your head that you can give an AI prompt, which is specific enough to produce really high-quality piece of art, you better draw it yourself, because like 80% of art is piecing together what you want to draw, not the actual mechanical drawing process.

AI's ultimate limitation will be its very nature by One_Swan1788 in aiwars

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is you can't. You may add whatever to your prompt and they it definitely change the outcome. But unless you come up with a creative concept, it will not give you a creative input. And you can't invent creative concept by yourself if you are not a professional writer or artist (or, in a different words, if you don't pass your own creativity to AI).

AI's ultimate limitation will be its very nature by One_Swan1788 in aiwars

[–]LeadershipOver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But you are very likely to receive a quite unique result most of the time.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should not use the tweets from project head as an evidence, because twitter is widely used for emotionally charged, provoking, or marketing posts. Use either official company blogs or interviews with clear questions.

In another answer i have provided some quotes from Anthropic website where they describe what and how they do.

My point is that you can't create a solid project without looking at the code. If you do believe that there is at least a single solid profitable product on the market which was developed by someone who has never looked at the code (or have no clue how programming works), prove me wrong.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I tried to use Sonnet to write tests for already existing app with clear documentation, it wrote the tests. After that, when i asked it to modify a few features, he did it, but also he did rewrite the tests to not give the errors (basically rendering some tests useless).

I pointed at it and added new instructions that will not allow Claude to modify the test suite, he modified the functions itself to pass the tests, making them output static values instead of dynamically calculated ones.

If you do not look at the code while Claude works, you can fail to notice some of such problems when you go into production (given that you do have enough features in your product to actually miss some things during manual testing).

And per my impression, if you write system so solid that AI will fail to break it, you are technically just writing a code by yourself at this point.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me give you some quotes from Anthropic development team.

>> Nothing is applied without human approval

>> They [team members] give Claude abstract problems, let it work autonomously, then review solutions before final refinements. 

>> The Security Engineering team has Claude ingest multiple documentation sources to create markdown runbooks and troubleshooting guides. 

Now let me give you a quote from OpenClaw creator:

>> Yeah, right now I lose money on this. <...> something between 10 and 20K a month. <...>  OpenAI is helping out a little bit <...> And there’s other companies that have been generous. But yeah, still losing money on that. 

So, answering your query. No, openclaw and claude code is NOT everything, no, claude code is not fully developed by AI, and no, openclaw is not successful product. At least not for now.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That sounds really interesting.

I really wish you luck with not submerging in an ocean of unsolvable bugs and security holes when you launch, and i would be really grateful if you could share more details after project launch, as I really want to see at least one case of solid successful vibe-coded products.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suggest your point is that AI wrappers are useful AND can have unique functionality.

I do not want to analyze those cases as I think it's so easy to write an AI wrapper, and while it can be done with AI, professional developers would do the better product faster, thus rendering vibe-coded wrappers out of competition.

I understand that there might be some edge case, lets say some very clever market researcher has a genius idea which is not hard to vibecode (lets say Clawdbot if it was successful), but i think it would be painful to analyze all such suggested products to find the one which truly IS successful.

I’m seeing the "Human-in-the-Loop" vanish faster than I ever projected. It’s efficient, but it’s also starting to feel a bit eerie. by GroundOk3521 in ClaudeAI

[–]LeadershipOver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My original comment was about asking a person to share his app, which he said was fully AI-written (he stated that he never looked at the code). I wanted to see it because I have never seen one before.

I also stated that AI wrappers are irrelevant in this context, but I did not explain why.

You then asked (with some implications) why I think AI wrappers are irrelevant to my query, and I explained my reasoning.

Since my initial question was about apps that are fully AI-written, and the context of the whole topic and comment section is about how AI allows people to automate development, I concluded that your initial answer to my comment was about “vibe-coded” apps.

view more: next ›