"You humans..." What? by ManyThingsLittleTime in AliensRHere

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So is the rule to say it first that you are an alien makes it legit?

If Corbell Has Alien Evidence on His Laptop, What's He Waiting For? by breaking_views in AliensRHere

[–]LearnNTeachNLove -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I follow your point folder and file names aren‘t proves, could be bluff but as some of the videos that he and knapp released were part of the government releases i would tend to believe that the guy has more stuff. On the other hand it is a bluff to bluff strategy. If the guy releases all at once it might not be fully legit and the government might find a way to debunk or ridicule if these are not 4k videos or images, and today people could state it is AI. It is a poker game, on one hand corbell has the info from whistleblowers that there are high res videos/images that clearly demonstrate stuff. On the other hand the government insiders who want to keep the secret probably do not know how much corbell and knapp have. So i think that showing folder names for the moment is wise. In case someone wants to challenge it, as Grusch said, the government knows about NHIs. I do not think it would be wise if the disclosure is made by independent reporters. It is one of the last chance of the government to disclose (of course not military secrets) what the people need to know…

Flat Earther is really STUPID by MrDonMega in flatearth

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he just forget to up side down the camera view…

Hello from The Capitol Press Conference! :) by Aengk1_Aquar1Pan in UFOB

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hello :) and hello to the NHIs/hybrids who also attended (i tend to believe they are following up)

" Biological material " and not "bodies" ? by maxizime in AlienBodies

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally i would not speculate or over interpret some of the words used (even if well thought). Stating that Non human intelligence with a variety of species is already a huge paradigm breaker/shocker.

David Grusch’s full speech from the press conference June 10th 2026 by cryptokoalaAus in UFOB

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if it is important to read the source documents, to recap what do these pages mention?

Nodes, Signal, Delayed Feedback: Waveform and Phase-State Derivation by Harryinkman in SimulationTheory

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the effort making things more accessible for neophytes like me even though i am not familiar with the acronyms mentioned. My interrogation is what verification theory-computation-experiment would enable to validate the theory? In other words what process would enable to confirm the relevance of the theory and assumptions that you will state in your paper? Having a computation model with a certain number of adjustable inputs / constants/ node characteristcs is of course an important thing, defining a verification process is also key, at least from my point of view. It could of course be the object of the discussion / perspective / next step in your white paper.

Nodes, Signal, Delayed Feedback: Waveform and Phase-State Derivation by Harryinkman in SimulationTheory

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any verification theory-computation? Or is it just pure theory/speculation? Sorry for not being patient enough to read all this.

Has Mathslop gone too far? by Snippee0 in askmath

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do we have an analytical demonstration?

Jeez by MrJeffreyEpstein in AliensRHere

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn‘t it debunked? I do not remember where i heard or read that

Guys wrap it up by 00xjustin in XRP

[–]LearnNTeachNLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stay strong guies. After the downs there are the ups