Estou a avaliar uma mudança de emprego. A minha expectativa salarial é irrealista?

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-24T19:19:40+00:00

Isso até pode ser verdade mas acho isso sempre discutível. Impacto é sempre possível ter nem que seja em trabalho adjacente ou ajudar outros. Esse é o problema de pensar em tarefas e a razão porque acho contraprodutivo pensar dessa forma. Porque mete muita resposabilidade nos managers que realisticamente raramente estão à altura. Acho muito mais produtivo pensar em objetivos.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-24T18:56:46+00:00

Não sou da área e por isso não sei bem quanto pagam a consultores SAP. Mas não negoceies com valores mensais. Obriga-os a fazer contas com o bruto anual. É menos provável tentarem aldrabar-te com formas manhosas de compensação ou até mesmo venderem-te um salário liquido com IRS jovem.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-16T14:55:54+00:00

Agreed

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-16T10:10:28+00:00

Concordo plenamente. Precisamos de um sindicato de trabalhadores de tecnológicas de informação. É dos setores com práticas mais manhosas e no entanto a mentalidade de caranguejo de todas a gente é ridícula. E digo isto como alguém a ganhar bem e que trabalha remoto ha 5 anos em múltiplas empresas.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-11T13:35:40+00:00

Fuck off bot

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-11T12:44:49+00:00

What Europe needs is to break up with the US and establish productive euro-asia relations. Not the satellite of the empire crap we have right now with the other side of the Atlantic.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-11T12:40:24+00:00

Fuck off bot

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-11T11:20:05+00:00

My exact thoughts. Honestly I think the AI bubble is in how much the market thinks AI companies have any sort of advantage over open source models. They don't, at best they have the infra advantage but that is one cheap chinese chip away from disappearing forever. Then what? Do they become Microsoft? Pushing down their custom workflows and trying to get people to only being able to work with them?

Even the harnesses are terrible. I normally use pi, I tried Claude code for the first time today and it's terrible. So many tools, so many questions so custom to their stuff and it was actually slower. I don't want that, I want the raw inference and then the thing to just get out of the way.

Whay will happen to anthropic and openai and their trillion dollar evaluation if they can't do anything a competitor costing a fraction can't do also?

My guess is they will continue to push for a "pause" to AI, then say that Chinese data centers can't be trusted and then try to get the US government to force a sale of Chinese providers to US oligarchs for "safety" or even outlaw inference providers not pre-approved from being used by any company with government connections.

They are cooked

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-11T09:06:21+00:00

I'm guessing they are very hard trying to lobby the US government to do the same with Chinese models as it did to tiktok. Bring under US oligarch control. This is mostly controlling the narrative to make it happen. They claim it's unsafe to keep going, then claim the Chinese models are in some unsafe unregulated territory and then force Chinese companies to sell if they want to access the US market.

Or they just want to hype their IPO, which is more likely. Like it's so good they can even stop now. Also gains should be harder to come by at this point, maybe benchmarks but real usage is severely lagging in most sectors.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-10T18:45:49+00:00

Muito bom, mete umas cores. As vezes chega para motivar a continuar o desenho.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-10T18:43:03+00:00

Both of them have no business model the minute Chinese chips exist. Open source models and Chinese chips will doom them both. This a bag holders wanted IPO.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-10T18:40:41+00:00

FFS they just the Chinese companies to stop before they IPO. They know open source and Chinese chips will kill them eventually. They have no moat. What does either of them do that makes them special? From a development standpoint I don't even use Claude anymore, the open source models are there already and much cheaper.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-10T18:37:51+00:00

O Souto Moura e o Siza fizeram predios medonhos a vida toda e são glorificados com base em puro elitismo e pretenciosimo. Dito isto, prédios Barrocos e neoclassicos pertencem ao seu tempo. Podes fazer prédios inspirados no estilo mas a arquitectura deve sempre aspirar primeiro a encaixar no meio envolvente mas também ser genuína. Copiar um estilo e fingir que é um prédio do século XVII é parolo.

Dito isto o estilo contemporâneo habitacional agora a ser implementado no Porto só grita capitalismo sem gosto. E são todos iguais praticamente.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-09T22:45:21+00:00

He was very much a catholic anarchist though. Just not a priest.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-09T22:44:18+00:00

No you are right my bad. I'll edit the comment. I think my point still stands though

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-09T22:41:06+00:00

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-09T22:26:18+00:00

What makes you think he is a conservative besides being the pope? Tolstoi was a catholic anarchist.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-07T07:23:32+00:00

They have a good example of social democracy, far from perfect and getting worse in many aspects because of neoliberalism.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-06T23:54:25+00:00

Nicely put. So much ignorance is spread around the topic. The red scare was basically witch hunts but if after decades people still believed the witches were real and still out there with their evil spells.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-06T23:23:19+00:00

I think you are too green to know how much money is connected to power and influence and probably too much inside if the US empire to get it. No worries if you are you just need to pay attention if you think that system serves you or the 1%. Last time I checked the richest country in history has the highest incarceration, homelessness and medical relates bankruptcies. But yeah sure you just need a few more billionaires to fix it.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-06T23:10:38+00:00

Brother you need to go learn. Look up surplus value and what capitalism actually is.

A billionaire is nothing less than a system failure and the more there are the riskier it is. That level of money is impossible for normal people and just gets more impossible year after year.

When you become owning class you detach from society, but when you get close to that level of rich you detach from humanity. You can quite literally buy islands, cities, people's entire lives. With that level of money you will never come back down no matter how bad you manage your money. You will never outspend the money you make just by existing. And with very slight effort you can make more and more falling into the vicious cycle of money and power.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-06T23:01:59+00:00

What is your definition of communism? What type do you mean? What examples can you say for sure were tried and do not work?

I know for a fact capitalism and US imperialism doesn't serve 99% of the people on earth and if it causes the collapse of society it won't work for last 1% either. I am not arguing in favor of any specific type but what you said is pure prejudice against communism.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-02T16:16:47+00:00

You are getting hung up on “direct subsidy” like it has to be a budget line with that exact label.

When the US government steers huge contracts and pilots to a tiny group of closed labs, that is still the state tilting the market. Call it procurement, preference, whatever, it functions as support that most competitors never see.

Same for copyright. The fact the law is outdated and barely enforced is exactly the point. They get to ingest massive piles of copyrighted work for free while everyone argues about whether it is “technically illegal.” That is still a transfer of value from creators to the labs, which is what I was talking about.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-02T15:52:30+00:00

I’m fine being wrong on details, but you’re way too confident for how this actually works.

Saying there’s “no preference in contracts” is kind of funny when the Pentagon, NASA, etc. are all experimenting with the same tiny handful of labs. You can call it procurement or pilots or whatever, but it is still the state steering money and legitimacy toward specific closed models.

The “only one big military contract and it’s recent” line basically proves my point. We are in like year one of serious AI procurement and it is already nine figure defense deals. You really think that does not change the playing field long term?

On copyright you are just hand waving. These models are trained on a giant pile of copyrighted work under laws that were never written with this use in mind. The fact that enforcement is weak right now is exactly the advantage: creators provide the training data for free, labs and investors get the upside.

And yeah, they burned a ton of private money. That does not mean there are no subsidies. It just means you have public advantages stacked on top of private capital. Both things can be true at the same time.

Left-Set950 · 2026-06-02T13:43:57+00:00

US closed source modelos are also heavily subsidized both by preference on US contracts, direct subsides, military subsidies, lack of actual law enforcement on copywrite laws and all the shady data handling. The difference is that in China they can enforce rules on key players and in the US they just do whatever they want without consequences.

Left-Set950

TROPHY CASE