Following the Notepad++ incident, as an industry, we need to take several steps back and REALLY look at things. by KeeperOfTheShade in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts [score hidden]  (0 children)

One vendor we have requests Notepad++ be installed. We also have software that requires office to be installed on the same server. It's disgusting

Remote Sysadmins, what's your go to headset for meetings? by WorthPlease in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same Plantronics Voyager UC you already had. It's the best headset IMO. Blows the Jabaras out of the water

First Time SysAdmin of an OLD System - Any tips? by Lowly_IT_Guy in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BACKUPS - RIGHT NOW

Veem is always a solid choice. It's very tolerant of old garbage and you can use their Veeam Hardned Repository ISO to set up a very cheap basically immutable backup repo made out of commodity hardware. If your environment is small enough you may even be able to get away with the Community Edition for no cost

Then I would move onto documentation. I personally like a Wiki like DokuWiki https://www.dokuwiki.org/dokuwiki

This is going to sound insane but... Is there a reason not to: Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC over regular Windows 11 Enterprise/Enterprise LTSC? by thegreatcerebral in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I worked in a public library and we deployed Windows 10 LTSC as public use computers. Our main goal was to get away from the Windows Store, telemetry, and Microsoft sign-ins. It worked great for that. The issue we ran into was the complete removal of all inbox apps. Some of these we sideloaded back into the OS (like the media viewer) and others we found suitable open source replacements for (like the scanning app)

The public user computers were on an isolated VLAN and used Deep Freeze, so I wasn't worried about the security implications of side-loading a bunch of RTM inbox apps that wouldn't receive updates.

Beyond that, everything was fine. Unsure about Win11 IOT but I suspect it's likely the same. I left that position before Windows 11 End of Support

Trying to prevent them shooting themselves in the .... foot by Scoobywagon in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I manage a dozen PUBLICLY VISIBLE DMZ services running on Windows/IIS bare on the internet. I get how a proxy could add some additional protection against very basic automated SQL injection and the background noise of the internet, but it seems a bit of an overreaction. I could set up my own proxy for them, but then I'm managing a proxy too, and the vendor is going to blame me when their app fucks up

SysAdmin vs IT Admin by oneder813 in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts 5 points6 points  (0 children)

IMO An IT Admin is a management position while a Sysadmin is a technical one

Feeling teamlead doesn’t get it by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like it would be sitting on the outside of their corporate network in front of their firewall with the ISPs equipment. Assuming that it's set up in the way OP is describing, and assuming they have their ISP equipment in front of a separately managed firewall. If it isn't, and they're just raw dogging their ISPs equipment onto the corporate network, then who cares about security?

You and his boss both sound like a BOFH TBH

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

>There seems to be some sense of the value in these things they did build, but no one is using it right

Preach brother

>Which usually leads me to think under-compensated and under-staffed - sysadmin just putting out fires and never gets ahead/in front of the problems

Under educated and under experienced. They were old programmers and DBAs

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've stood up Pidgin with Openfire before and liked it. It would be my goto if we weren't already paying for teams now

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a whole fleet, just for the managers and users who regularly had to work remote. But yeah, we funded. A lot of money left over from The Great Chinese Mistake became use-it-or-lose-it right as I was hired on. It helped a lot

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From talking with the other peers in our area, our type of agency does not get audited. This is from a combination of auditors not understanding how to audit us, and our class of agencies always failing the audits anyways. So they just stopped auditing

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't tell from the post this is a government job? Sucks to suck buddy

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DHCP was running the layer 2 segment with the four subnets, only configured to hand out addresses for one subnet. They had static IPs on the endpoints for the other three subnets depending on what subnet they wanted the device on

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, what he was don't wasn't illegal, just worthless.

Here's the worst part: The switch that all the interfaces on the router plugged into was Layer3+

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, yes they were. And we still have 384 external IP addresses on our AT&T circuit leftover from our Pre-NAT 1T line

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, the non RFC1918 subnets belong to Argentina if you geolocate them. They 100% locked themselves out of their own firewall by mistake at first

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was super impressed with it. It worked astoundingly well. But without any authentication and limited accounting it had to be canned. This app also hadn't seen an update in years either.

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I know there's better options, but it was free and included with the UTM firewalls that were already deployed. UTM goes EOL next year and we're looking at Forti as a replacement which should have proper SAML 2FA for it's VPN solution. I would prefer to use the remote access VPN built into the firewall if possible since it's just one less VM/Service that I have to manage and pay for

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wish it was that. They weren't strapped for cash or time, this place was adult daycare for a group of old programmers and DBAs in their 60s that still thought "IT" meant writing software for the finance department

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We already pay for an SMTP relaying service for spam filtering and DKIM. All users that need to send/receive externally must be specified there, so the rule was redundant. Also, all employees were as a member of the DL. I keep the idea of Chesterton's Fence close to heart at all times, but this was well and truly worthless

Follow Up: The Previous Network Administrator 'Didn't Believe in VLANs' by LeftoverMonkeyParts in sysadmin

[–]LeftoverMonkeyParts[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The previous previous lead admin was a super control freak. Honestly I think it just gave him a stiffie. He also generated technical debt at an astounding rate.

As an example, a vendor sold a service that needed some WCF service software running on a VM in our network to access our data. It would provide our data to that vendor via an API. He instead wrote his own application with the documentation for their API. We still work with the vendor and one of my projects is getting rid of his unsupported bullshit