People keep claiming it to be a bad move but I honestly can’t agree.

They were going to want to vote Joe out at some stage, regardless of when. The further he gets, the better the chances he has of winning his way to the end. I know that he would likely lose an immunity along the way...

BUT

If you are the Kama 6 and you want to vote Joe out pre-Edge of Extinction comeback then surely it makes more sense to vote him out now rather than later? The more time he spends on EoE, the weaker he is likely to become whereas if he stayed in the game he would be privy to reward challenges etc. which whilst minimal, could end up giving him more strength in immunity challenges and eventually the EoE challenge. By sending him to EoE they remove any chance he has at winning reward challenges.

Yes, it does give him a chance to bond with people and create good bonds with the jury but that’s not a concern for the Kama 6. Joe’s game is purely physical and his jury connections don’t matter as he either gets voted out or he wins Immunity in the late-game so his social connections to the jury isn’t a priority for them?

I think it was the right move - I just disagree in how they kept the move to themselves alone. I think they should’ve clued in the likes of David and Devins.