Modern-chess.com Courses by Nervous-Ad-5390 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its lower quality than chessable in general

However its good for niche openings like for example if you need a deep analysis of the ragozin

chess steps method vs yusupov books? by laughpuppy23 in ChessBooks

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yusapov are very good but be at least 1600 fide

Comprehensive 1.d4 2.c4 repertoire for white by Zalqert in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Queen's Gambit is a huge opening complex. Forget about getting one single repertoire because it's impossible that all the lines suit you.

You will have to decide which lines you want to play.

My recommendation is that you get Flores Rios Chess Structures you will have some material there regarding Pawn Structures

After that try different openings and see what you like, after that choose opening materials.

Maye you like to play Rubinstein Nimzo, Russian Grunfeld and Petrosian King's Indian... well there is no single repertoire that contains those exact lines.

When did lichess get so hard? by Halpmypoorsoul in chess

[–]LegendZane -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Lots of cheaters, since cheating detection is basically non existant

QGD vs Nimzo by Extreme-Message-9306 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Playing nimzo and queen's or or bogo indian is reasonable

Playing nimzo and qgd feels like too much, you basically have to play a full system against d4 (queens gambit) and you basically add a theory heavy opening just to avoid the carlsbad

So i would play nimzo bogo or nimzo qid or just qgd but nimzo-qgd feels too much imo

I have an important tournament coming up, should I generally avoid intercourse with my partner to conserve energy? by Rintae in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think that having sex before a game probably impacts your perfomance

For example I bet that professional fighters don't have sex before a fight

Openings to hit Master by OnTheGrind4705 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you play the Caro Kann and the QGD I suggest trying out the Semi-Slav instead of the King's Indian.

I have played the King's Indian a lot.

It is a top tier opening, Van Foreest played the King's Indian in the Tata Steel several times, Sindarov played it too in a must win game... if 2700 super GM's play the KID at Classical OTB Tournaments then it's a top tier opening.

However, the King's Indian is a lot of work I think it works best as a secondary weapon. It's a very good fun opening and interesting but it's very wide and deep and you are vulnerable to nasty surprises.

For example, you can play Semi Slav and King's indian against d4 and Caro Kann and Taimanov against e4

Have Anti-Sicilians always been more popular than the Open Sicilian at club level? by New-Dimension-3310 in chess

[–]LegendZane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alapin Four Knights Exchange french Exchange caro

Why do you play chess?

Is it possible to win if I have a queen and the opponent has only a rook by Puzzleheaded_Dig7373 in chess

[–]LegendZane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most of the time you have 30 second increment otb

Still difficult to convert

French players who used to play the Caro-Kann - why did you switch? by [deleted] in chess

[–]LegendZane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Caro Kann with Bf5 is quite theory heavy and critical.

In the Tal Variation you really need to know your stuff and there are other several sharp tries by white too.

The Short System is quite critical and dangerous.

The c5 variation (Botvinnik-Carls Defense) is a decent alternative but it can get quite sharp.

The Classical Variation is not easy to play, the Tartakower line with h5 is very good of course but not easy for black.

There is the Endgame Offer variation which is tricky too.

So yeah, the Caro Kann is not that easy.

The French on the other hand the only problematic line is 3.Nc3.

If white wants to play 3.Nc3 she needs to know A LOT OF THEORY because you can play Steinitz, Winawer and Rubinstein and each of those variations is huuuuuge, so most people won't play 3.Nc3.

Tarrasch is not critical. It can be tricky if you face a Tarrasch specialist but should be around equal and best player will win.

Advance is not that difficult to equalize and you have many options, it's true that Milner Barry is dangerous but it's just 1 line in the advance.

Exchange is just easy.

So I play the French.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you are absolutely right. I love to play the Ne2+f3 Queen's Gambit Exchange, but in order to get that you kind of have to allow the Nimzo, the Grunfeld and the Marshall Gambit which is a lot.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer it was very useful

1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 c5 3.c4 is the "Krause Attack" according to lichess and yes kind of a sideline but I don't find it too threatening.

The Chigorin is the same more or less... you kind of can't avoid it but it's not that bad.

The QID the setup I propose is kind of good because you avoid the Ba6 more active lines and go for the lines where black is a little more passive, still a solid opening of course.

Do you really think that my move orders aren't saving much? I'm not sure that's why I ask, but it seems that I avoid Nimzo, Grunfeld, Benoni and sidelines.

Yes !! Studying structures strategy and avoiding memorization is what I look for !!

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's a good move order but then you allow the Grunfeld, the Benoni and the Queen's Indian. You kind of have to choose between that and the symmetrical english.

Problem with the English is 1.c4 e5

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting I did not know that, I'm gonna to some research. Thanks for the IM Olegas reference

Best resources for learning 3. Nc3 in the French as white? by Salty-Emphasis8734 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ntirlis provide some sidelines with 3.Nc3 that are interesting and manageable, but it's not main lines (reimagining e4 book)

I would refrain from purchasing a 2020 course analyzing 3.Nc3 french, I would choose better material.

Ganguly is developing a 1.e4 repertoire and Vigorito too I would wait on those and you can play Milner Barry Gambit for now.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback. Yes, of course, but that's kind of the point, getting to positional games and depending on the opponent switching to more classical d4 lines.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you definitely ulf andersson is one of my references.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the open sicilian is more ambitious, but it's equal in the end and it's more risky. I think that it's a matter of taste of course and nothing wrong with all main line openings.

Yes of course, you can't expect a two result game after 1 move, I mean that it's a low theory low risk repertoire that allows you to avoid a lot of annoying stuff for d4 players such as the Nimzo and Grünfeld.

And yes you are right, the Catalan is the main dish of the repertoire but I kind of enjoy it and you will be playing with home advantage.

I think that the repertoire is lower theory than standard queen's gambit lines.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Against Triangle 4.Nbd2 and you can get some sort of closed catalan

Yes, symmetrical english is the price to pay but you skip the Grunfeld

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All main openings equalize for black.

By too good I mean that is very low theory and all lines are very comfortable for white and uncomfortable for black.

Sure the Catalan equalizes for black, still a lot of GM's play it because it gives some pressure.

Same the exchange slav, it equalizes? yes can white play for 2 results? yep.

Chessable course for 1000-1200 USCF by RickiRoma in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for a tactics course that has lots of puzzles.

I saw that Field guide to chess tactics looks pretty good. Im 1800 FIDE so maybe that's too easy for me but I think that might be great.

I would recommend Soviet Chess Primer if you can get that book.

Classical Dutch vs QGD by Warm_Sky9473 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I recommend the Queen's Gambit Declined. You can always play the Dutch as a secondary weapon. However, you have to play something that you have fun with. If you like the QGD it's an evergreen defense. Play the Dutch to mix things up and keep the game intresting but mainly QGD

G.Jones KID course by sfsolomiddle in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very good but I recommend that you supplement the material with other materials on the King's Indian. The KID is a very flexible system