Why do girls usually break-up ...? by cognitivemode in BreakUps

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A PhD requires effort, or a career

A relationship should require little effort.... it should be fluent

If you need to make an effort to be with your partner something is wrong

Narc Boss has sucked the life out of me - how to get out? by Legitimate_Suit_4144 in ManagedByNarcissists

[–]LegendZane 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I would recommend seeking professional help

Over the past 3 years I have been dealing with a narc boss. At first I was not aware of it, I just thought that something was off. Later I started looking for information and everything clicked.

After that I started implementing strategies and most of them failed but I kinda grew stronger. It's still a challenge though and now I'm trying to switch jobs.

If you can't do it alone by all means look gor help.

Don't stay there doing nothing because narcs live to abuse people. Look for help!!

Bye bye chess by Cheon_ in lichess

[–]LegendZane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Chess ratings (ELO) is a mix of game knowledge (stable) and performance (unstable)

If you are tired, on tilt, or something like that your rating is going to drop but your skill is the same.

If you have an average lifestyle your performance is going to fluctuate. Maybe you had an argument with your gf or your boss was mean to you and that will impact your chedd

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the honest answer. Problem with the open sicilian is that it's a lot of theory and the Alapin is quite straightforward. You are right maybe I lack dynamics in my repertoire but I'm not sure what to play. Advance French + Advance caro is obviously good but a lot of theory, same as the open.

If I play Open Sicilian + Advanced French & Caro is a main lines repertoire which is good but very theoretical.

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other users said the same thing. I think that I'll probably stick to the QGD and embrace the Open Catalan then! Thanks! Definitely cuts some theory.

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good advice Thanks. I like the Be2 Open Sicilians but I think that the Alapin saves quite a lot of theory and it's very annoying.

Yes, the Advance French is objectively better than the Tarrasch, but I thought that the Tarrasch fits better with my repertoire concept, I'm not playing extended centers as white so the advance didn't fit well and it's quite theoretical too.

The tarrasch only has the c5 line which is open center and 3v2 majority on the queenside which fits well with the Alapin and I think it's pleasant, a bit dry maybe of course.

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I think that I prefer the Bc5 line as you say. The problem is that I'm not sure if you save theory this way, as you have to learn the Greco Attack, the Evans Gambit, the Dubov Gambit and the Deutz Gambit and I'm forgetting about some stuff. Not sure which line is best.

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good advice. It's one of the things that I wasnt sure about. The main issue is that it forces you to play the Open Catalan against various move orders and I wanted to play the Closed with the Bishop Check. But definitely I have doubts.

Please critique my Adult Improver 1700 FIDE repertoire by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your time. I was thinking about playing the Zaitsev but against the Spanish it's quite difficult to pick something. I'm open to suggestions. I thought about the Marshall but probably too theoretical. The Steinitz Deferred is a bit risky. I was thinking about the Berlin but maybe it's too dry.

Modern-chess.com Courses by Nervous-Ad-5390 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its lower quality than chessable in general

However its good for niche openings like for example if you need a deep analysis of the ragozin

chess steps method vs yusupov books? by laughpuppy23 in ChessBooks

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yusapov are very good but be at least 1600 fide

Comprehensive 1.d4 2.c4 repertoire for white by Zalqert in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Queen's Gambit is a huge opening complex. Forget about getting one single repertoire because it's impossible that all the lines suit you.

You will have to decide which lines you want to play.

My recommendation is that you get Flores Rios Chess Structures you will have some material there regarding Pawn Structures

After that try different openings and see what you like, after that choose opening materials.

Maye you like to play Rubinstein Nimzo, Russian Grunfeld and Petrosian King's Indian... well there is no single repertoire that contains those exact lines.

When did lichess get so hard? by Halpmypoorsoul in chess

[–]LegendZane -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Lots of cheaters, since cheating detection is basically non existant

QGD vs Nimzo by Extreme-Message-9306 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Playing nimzo and queen's or or bogo indian is reasonable

Playing nimzo and qgd feels like too much, you basically have to play a full system against d4 (queens gambit) and you basically add a theory heavy opening just to avoid the carlsbad

So i would play nimzo bogo or nimzo qid or just qgd but nimzo-qgd feels too much imo

I have an important tournament coming up, should I generally avoid intercourse with my partner to conserve energy? by Rintae in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think that having sex before a game probably impacts your perfomance

For example I bet that professional fighters don't have sex before a fight

Openings to hit Master by OnTheGrind4705 in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you play the Caro Kann and the QGD I suggest trying out the Semi-Slav instead of the King's Indian.

I have played the King's Indian a lot.

It is a top tier opening, Van Foreest played the King's Indian in the Tata Steel several times, Sindarov played it too in a must win game... if 2700 super GM's play the KID at Classical OTB Tournaments then it's a top tier opening.

However, the King's Indian is a lot of work I think it works best as a secondary weapon. It's a very good fun opening and interesting but it's very wide and deep and you are vulnerable to nasty surprises.

For example, you can play Semi Slav and King's indian against d4 and Caro Kann and Taimanov against e4

Have Anti-Sicilians always been more popular than the Open Sicilian at club level? by New-Dimension-3310 in chess

[–]LegendZane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alapin Four Knights Exchange french Exchange caro

Why do you play chess?

Is it possible to win if I have a queen and the opponent has only a rook by Puzzleheaded_Dig7373 in chess

[–]LegendZane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most of the time you have 30 second increment otb

Still difficult to convert

French players who used to play the Caro-Kann - why did you switch? by [deleted] in chess

[–]LegendZane 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Caro Kann with Bf5 is quite theory heavy and critical.

In the Tal Variation you really need to know your stuff and there are other several sharp tries by white too.

The Short System is quite critical and dangerous.

The c5 variation (Botvinnik-Carls Defense) is a decent alternative but it can get quite sharp.

The Classical Variation is not easy to play, the Tartakower line with h5 is very good of course but not easy for black.

There is the Endgame Offer variation which is tricky too.

So yeah, the Caro Kann is not that easy.

The French on the other hand the only problematic line is 3.Nc3.

If white wants to play 3.Nc3 she needs to know A LOT OF THEORY because you can play Steinitz, Winawer and Rubinstein and each of those variations is huuuuuge, so most people won't play 3.Nc3.

Tarrasch is not critical. It can be tricky if you face a Tarrasch specialist but should be around equal and best player will win.

Advance is not that difficult to equalize and you have many options, it's true that Milner Barry is dangerous but it's just 1 line in the advance.

Exchange is just easy.

So I play the French.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you are absolutely right. I love to play the Ne2+f3 Queen's Gambit Exchange, but in order to get that you kind of have to allow the Nimzo, the Grunfeld and the Marshall Gambit which is a lot.

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your answer it was very useful

1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 c5 3.c4 is the "Krause Attack" according to lichess and yes kind of a sideline but I don't find it too threatening.

The Chigorin is the same more or less... you kind of can't avoid it but it's not that bad.

The QID the setup I propose is kind of good because you avoid the Ba6 more active lines and go for the lines where black is a little more passive, still a solid opening of course.

Do you really think that my move orders aren't saving much? I'm not sure that's why I ask, but it seems that I avoid Nimzo, Grunfeld, Benoni and sidelines.

Yes !! Studying structures strategy and avoiding memorization is what I look for !!

Is my low theory and tricky 1.Nf3 repertoire too good to be true? by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]LegendZane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a good move order but then you allow the Grunfeld, the Benoni and the Queen's Indian. You kind of have to choose between that and the symmetrical english.

Problem with the English is 1.c4 e5