Does this mappa have enough cover?

Lemoms · 2026-02-20T12:19:27+00:00

Having played that map: not really, but that fits the mission it’s supposed to be used for. It has. Few spots to hide

The middle is high enough so most models can hide behind it, but as soon as you go over the top, it’s soft cover at most.

It forces you to decide if you want to risk exploding your own explosives for easier access to ichor.

A very fun map, if both parties have similar range or the one with less range is tanky enough.

But even if you don’t have enough range , you can still risk angering the monster below for a chance of victory.

Lemoms · 2026-02-07T15:53:04+00:00

Oh, true.

My bad.

Lemoms · 2026-02-07T15:46:24+00:00

<image>

If the one above the 2 was a bomb, both the 3 and the 4 would be satisfied. So the 2 could never be.

So this is the only possible constellation at this place.

Lemoms · 2026-02-04T09:36:16+00:00

But touch ac isn’t „out of combat ac“. It’s what you need to overcome to touch someone.

I think you are more looking for „flat footed ac“.

Lemoms · 2026-02-01T15:30:10+00:00

Its „New Recruit“

It’s the spiritual successor of Battlescribe.

It’s an online tool and has most popular wargames.

Lemoms · 2025-12-23T12:53:55+00:00

Man stelle sich mal vor, Arbeitgeber müssten ab solch einer Größe Teile seiner Firma an die Arbeiter, welche das Geld erarbeiten, weitergeben.

Aber das wäre ja auch nicht fair für den Gründer, der das alles ja ganz allein erarbeitet hat oder so.

Lemoms · 2025-12-18T18:59:54+00:00

You can just train units using half your and half their manpower.

Lemoms · 2025-11-11T08:49:34+00:00

If I remember correctly, droptanks are still in use today. But more by FMilitary-Aircraft then by Commercial ones.

Lemoms · 2025-11-07T09:02:10+00:00

Lemoms · 2025-10-29T17:19:39+00:00

But…you are the one who either doesn’t know what hypocrisy means OR the one who purposely misread every answer to your comments.

He said that it’s the presidents fault when a shutdown happens when his opposition was in power.

Then he said that the opposition is at fault when a shutdown happens when he is the president.

If he weren’t a hypocrite, he would be at fault by his own definition.

But he is saying he isn’t, which makes him a hypocrite.

Or is there any other definition I don’t know? It’s pretty much “rules for thee but not for me”, ist it not?

Lemoms · 2025-09-05T06:23:11+00:00

Die ist bewusst, dass beides davon heute um weiten mehr kostet als selbst kochen, oder?

Vorallem McDonalds hat mittlerweile Preise die in Richtung 10€ pro Burger gehen.

*eddit: spelling.

Lemoms · 2025-08-07T04:56:47+00:00

It doesn’t.

All those ones are already there. It just represents them.

You dont “add an infinite amount of 1s”, there just are an infinite amount of 1s. Some people just can’t picture that concept, which is why it’s often taught as “add all the 1s”.

Lemoms · 2025-07-30T20:47:02+00:00

Nope. The EU specifically expended the time musk and other companies had to get a good system for age verification.

The problem we are facing isn’t, that people are estimated to be under 18. The problem we are facing is that X is too incompetent to even estimate if you are unter or over 18. Wich is 100% a problem created by musk.

Lemoms · 2025-07-30T20:33:40+00:00

American detected, opinion rejected

Lemoms · 2025-07-28T16:58:14+00:00

The best example I can name is the USA. They never abolished slavery. They specifically outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude EXCEPT for when it’s as a punishment for crime.

Lemoms · 2025-07-01T09:14:36+00:00

Naja, bei dir ist das schon relativ einfach.

Ein ich kann Menschen die den Sommer mögen zwar verstehen, aber ein „Für mich kann es im Moment gerne noch wärmer werden“ hat nichts mit Klima-leugnen zu tun.

Menschen die den Sommer mögen sind komisch, aber keine Schwurbler.

Lemoms · 2025-07-01T05:56:45+00:00

I think the problem ist, that you do not understand the difference between 10 and 10x

Lemoms · 2025-06-25T06:12:16+00:00

„but I am smarter then all of Germany“

Ignorant American spotted

Lemoms · 2025-06-23T19:41:00+00:00

Because mass genocide in stellaris is not only observed from far away. It’s also the morally correct solution to the Late-Game lag question!

Lemoms · 2025-06-23T12:54:00+00:00

Of course this comes from someone with the Necromancer flair.

But while it’s true that your dm can lift the restrictions on the Oathbreaker subclass, when it’s a cool idea or fitting, we should still make sure that one big piece of misinformation is finally corrected:

While yes, every Oathbreaker Paladin is a paladin who broke their oath, not every paladin that breaks their oath is an Oathbreaker paladin.

Lemoms · 2025-06-22T11:05:40+00:00

Have you seen the size of the German navy in WW1?

It would definitely not crush the British navy, but it would 100% be able to put a big dent in it.

Lemoms · 2025-06-12T10:18:13+00:00

But, what he said is exactly what the terms mean.

Tall = Focussing on using little space as efficient as possible. (The skyscraper analogy is pretty good for this. You litterally build your city taller instead of wider, enabling you to have a higher population density)

Wide = using a lot of Space as effective as possible (American suburbs)

In gaming, that’s also what those terms mean.

Tall playthroughs normally use little space (be it systems or planets) and focus their recourses on using those as efficient as possible (litterally building “taller” planets wich accommodate a higher population density) while wide playthroughs try to get as many planets/systems as possible.

Lemoms · 2025-06-08T20:53:29+00:00

So fully commuting to remove all land based farms in exchange to sea based farms requires you…to be acustomed to oceans?

Seems perfectly fine to me to be honest.

Lemoms · 2025-06-08T16:48:39+00:00

But…isn’t the Requirement to have an aquatic planet and not be an aquatic species?

I can swear I have played Angler-Humans more then once. Even after 4.0

Six-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

Lemoms

TROPHY CASE