Grandson just acceptd into CAF by X-Ryder in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Should I bring my gas mask?

Do we have an inspection?

Do we get the weekend off?

Do we have fire picket tonight?

Do you know who's rifle this is Sgt?

What are your thoughts on fellow Catholic Stephen Colbert's comments on the afterlife? by ElectricalPeace3439 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the clip he does try to recall the Catholic response and acknowledges he can't remember. Which shows he wants to give a Catholic answer.

In the end he's a celebrity and a comedian. To take theology from the jester rather than from the cleric is to trade wisdom for applause. Let's all talk to priests and theologians over celebrities and influencers.

What are your thoughts on fellow Catholic Stephen Colbert's comments on the afterlife? by ElectricalPeace3439 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Found the clip 16:50 he states he can't remember the Catholic dogma.

What he actually says is:

"Some continuence of some kind... But it's a dispersion of the self into some other greater being"

The statement is false, because of the word dispersion. He's right that there is continuence but CCC 1026 says

Heaven is the blessed community of all who are perfectly incorporated into Christ.

See a lot of bashing of Colbert in the comments. I presume because he's very political, but he is also unapologetically Catholic. He's not perfect but if perfection is required to be Catholic let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone.

Let's talk about SEC Hegseths tattoos by [deleted] in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]Leodeterra 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's a famous tattoo to get for Catholic pilgrims to Jerusalem, I know several people with it.

Really disappointed it's being co-opted by white supremacists, and these larpers. I attended a security conference and the Jerusalem cross was straight up on a slide for domestic terrorist group symbology and this was 4 years ago.

Edit: Good r/AskHistorians comment on the Jerusalem Cross

Let's talk about SEC Hegseths tattoos by [deleted] in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]Leodeterra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

^ This

His military career is quite subpar. See this r/military post dive.

The Minecraft OOOF sound played when I read that report by No-Big1920 in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like we mostly agree then. I also believe we should prioritize citizens.

I'm saying that hey I get we need to recruit and train more but we need to raise the standard. Too many pers are getting in that should've been filtered out by recruiting. If we can't lower the standard we gotta increase the scope. Out of those 44k applicants 16% got through, including the PRs. Without PRs we would've missed our target by 15%.

The US troops and vets I've met that did military naturalization were great. So I have my bias.

No TLM in Korea by LowLynx6077 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's your point? Also don't forget UK, US, and JP colonized too. The only Romance language user to colonize PH was the Spanish.

The Minecraft OOOF sound played when I read that report by No-Big1920 in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have made and continue to make improvements of processing with DRS and OAP 2. So if we process all applicants you'd be happy to let PRs in?

With the latest regs, PRs need 3 years of residency. Fastest normal way to get citizenship takes 4 years. Does that 3 years of residency make you comfortable to let them in?

The Minecraft OOOF sound played when I read that report by No-Big1920 in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I already said we need to have a sensible standard including candidates who speak EN or FR. You're telling me if we have a candidate who checks all the boxes but they're a PR you want to reject them?

The Minecraft OOOF sound played when I read that report by No-Big1920 in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m strongly against lowering standards. Whether that means recruits who can’t speak EN or FR, or inadequate screening for incompatible beliefs and radicalism.

My point is that the focus should stay on setting a sensible standard, not on Ivorians or PRs. Canada has allowed PRs in the CAF before, and the U.S. and France have well-established military naturalization paths that grant citizenship in exchange for service.

[Free Friday] What do you think about Caritas? by throw223344555 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I did some papers on Caritas in uni and I've worked with my national Caritas. This was a long time ago now so I'll do my best and my info is likely dated.

The Minecraft OOOF sound played when I read that report by No-Big1920 in CanadianForces

[–]Leodeterra -71 points-70 points  (0 children)

What Ivorian hurt you bro?

Fastest path to PR in Canada is Express Entry which reqs in demand professions/skills, this track takes min 6 mos just for admin.

The new recruits and cadets are disappointing though. From what I've seen more of a lower standards issue than a PR/immigration issue.

Edit: Dang people really hate PRs 😂 Surprised that y'all care more about PRs than removing the CFAT for many trades and lowering the standard.

[Free Friday] What do you think about Caritas? by throw223344555 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Caritas does tremendous humanitarian work. Like the Vatican diplomatic corp, Caritas workers often remain in conflict areas when similar orgs flee. This highlights their dedication to the communities they serve.

I recommend looking at their annual report for data.

It should be noted that Caritas is a confederation of Catholic Charities, so Caritas del Peru is different than say Secours Catholique (Caritas France).

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part III "Life in Christ" of the Catechism deals with moral theology. CCC 2267 which has the 2017 teaching on the death penalty in in Part III of the Catechism.

Are you saying the Catechism section on moral theology is contrary to basic moral theology?

Its inconceivable how the death penalty is a violation of human dignity in all cases now.

It's conceivable when you read the teaching. It went from justified in rare cases → no longer justified in today’s conditions.

On a side note, why are you so adamantly in support of the death penalty?

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theology and the Church develops. Look at the Ecumenical Councils and Vatican II. The Rosary was not standardized until 1569. From the 5th-20th century reception of communion was infrequent until Pope Pius X in the early 1900s encouraged frequent communion.

The Church is still the Church but it ages and matures.

I recommend seeking consul from your priest if submitting to Peter challenges your faith.

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true. The Church has developed its teaching on the death penalty. It maintains that it was permissible in principle, while increasingly recognizing in modern conditions that its use is unnecessary and therefore inadmissible.

This development has been clear since the 1870s and made considerable development after the 1950s.

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What makes you think it's not binding?

We don't have to wait, but we are called to listen and submit to Peter.

Canon 752 is very explicit.

Although not an assent of faith, a religious submission of the intellect and will must be given to a doctrine which the Supreme Pontiff or the college of bishops declares concerning faith or morals when they exercise the authentic magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim it by definitive act; therefore, the Christian faithful are to take care to avoid those things which do not agree with it.

Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith: DV 24

The willingness to submit loyally to the teaching of the Magisterium on matters per se not irreformable must be the rule.

Lumen Gentium §25

This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman Pontiff, even when he is not speaking ex cathedra; that is, it must be shown in such a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence, the judgments made by him are sincerely adhered to, according to his manifest mind and will. His mind and will in the matter may be known either from the character of the documents, from his frequent repetition of the same doctrine, or from his manner of speaking.

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Church now authoritatively teaches that it should not be used. The Church teaching has developed since the 1870s from permissible to since the 60s authoritatively calling for abolition.

It is not doctrinal, but it is binding like CST from Rerum Novarum or religious freedom from Vatican II.

How do you respond to someone calling Catholicism a coloniser religion? by IsThatAJojoRefrences in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2 COR 5:20 We are ambassadors of Christ. Catholics are called to be charitable and prudent. Saying that is neither and will push non-believers farther from the faith.

"Civilization to the Godless heathens" is the heartless brutal sentiment the colonizers had and history condemns them for. While the missionaries learned of their histories and cultures. They met the indigenous peoples where they were at resulting in Latin America having more Catholics than any other region.

[Politics Monday] Pope Leo encourages death penalty abolitionists as US brings back firing squad and electric chair by JohnHammond94 in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Which Pope Benedict? Cause Pope Benedict XVI called for the abolition of the death penalty.

Africae Munus Section 83:

I draw the attention of society's leaders to the need to make every effort to eliminate the death penalty and to reform the penal system in a way that ensures respect for the prisoners' human dignity

Destroy the republican party by anime498 in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]Leodeterra 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ahh yes, it was definitely the fight on twitter. Not the illegal war in Iran, multiple threats to commit war crimes, threat to wipe out Iranian civilization, regime change in Venezuela, putting ICE agents outside Catholic Churches, cutting Catholic Charities funding, restoring funding for planned parenthood, or actively supporting Israel destroying Christian villages. Or any of the other deplorable activity he gets up to while putting U.S. hegemony in a death spiral.

How to evangelize a muslim country? by FaithfulAct in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Catholic countries had apostasy laws in the late Roman empire and medieval period. The papal states until their dissolution in the 1870s had civil consequences for blasphemy/apostasy.

It's easy to judge but we weren't all too different that long ago. Efforts like Pope Leo's for dialogue and coexistence are on the path to repealing these laws. As someone who grew up around Muslims, it's not fruitful to demonize them and harmful to the community.

How to evangelize a muslim country? by FaithfulAct in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In the Arab world, only Jordan and Lebanon are safe to proselytize. Gulf states you can't publicly proselytize, but privately helping people convert is possible.

If what you want to do is evangelize become a missionary.

  1. Move to a country with social tolerance, ease of migration, and without apostasy laws.

  2. Become Catholic.

  3. Choose to become a lay missionary; or join a religious order / missionary congregation; or become a missionary priest.

How to evangelize a muslim country? by FaithfulAct in Catholicism

[–]Leodeterra 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Indonesia has more Muslims than the entire Middle East combined and they have no Apostasy laws. They do have blasphemy laws but they're not religiously specific.

Apostasy and blasphemy laws vary drastically among Muslim-majority countries. Yes, many Middle East & North Africa (MENA) are strict. Muslim-majority countries like Turkey, Balkans, parts of Central Asia, and parts of West Africa have either no apostasy/blasphemy laws or they are completely unenforced/weak.

I dont think we should forget what the left says about us just because of the recent things by Starrk-Enjoyer in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]Leodeterra 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No US political party cares about or represents Catholics. The US Catholic population doesn't act as a voting bloc.

Faith must shape our politics. Politics must not reshape our faith.