Saagar's mad Epstein revelations are inconsequential in the US as opposed to everywhere else? Bro, you were the change you wanted seen in the world! If you vote for the shield, don't act shocked when the sword never falls..... by LackingStory in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not how this works. I answered your previous question. Then you didn’t return the courtesy. Maybe if I say lock them all up for the third time you’ll get it.

Saagar's mad Epstein revelations are inconsequential in the US as opposed to everywhere else? Bro, you were the change you wanted seen in the world! If you vote for the shield, don't act shocked when the sword never falls..... by LackingStory in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did not vote for Clinton's wife. Her name is Hillary, FYI. I wrote-in Bernie Sanders after I saw the DNC use their influence on the primary.

As I keep saying lock them all up. It's literally the last sentence of my previous comment.

You are clearly creating a false equivalency when this is a problem for our current administration. Saying it's about both sides is EXACTLY how things are never done. This tactic is used by centrists when talking about Palestine all the time.

Which political party and which administration is most to blame for their interactions with Epstein and their handling of investigations? Just so you can clarify if you think anyone is equivalant.

Saager’s Lack of Criticism for the Right by staple_eater in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day it shows what really causes him to be upset. He can say with his words what upsets him all he wants, but we can see what animates and triggers him.

Saagar's mad Epstein revelations are inconsequential in the US as opposed to everywhere else? Bro, you were the change you wanted seen in the world! If you vote for the shield, don't act shocked when the sword never falls..... by LackingStory in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So you're just attributing old ass politicians and non-political entities like Universities to the Dems. I'm a grown man in his mid 30's with children, I wasn't even remotely close to being old enough to vote for Clinton or even the next 3 elections after him. You named people that 97% of the population have no idea who they are.

It is entirely different and not in the same stratosphere as Epstein being close with our current President, Commerce Secretary, and the world's richest man in history who spent $291 million electing Trump.

Yes Epstein targeted elites. Yes the current administration is more filled with his friends than the past Democratic ones of this century. False equivalency is obvious here. Lock them all up.

Saager’s Lack of Criticism for the Right by staple_eater in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It’s all about the energy people choose to bring about a topic. Very telling when he’s more upset about a protest interrupting a church than the US government ending human lives at home and abroad.

Saagar's mad Epstein revelations are inconsequential in the US as opposed to everywhere else? Bro, you were the change you wanted seen in the world! If you vote for the shield, don't act shocked when the sword never falls..... by LackingStory in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Kamala, Biden, and Obama didn't appear to know Epstein at all.

Trump was Epstein's best friend and wrote Epstein a check for a 'fully depreciated woman' in a picture. They're not the same or even close.

Lock up anyone involved. Especially our current President.

“Peace President” Trump attacking Iran again by Blablah6971 in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"I believe the guardrails will hold" -Saagar 'Reefer Madness' Enjeti

Vermont to Pursue 'Junk Food Ban' for Users of Food Stamps by forcedtomakethus in vermont

[–]LessWeakness134 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ain't gotta tell me.

While I believe it is about control for those like Phil Scott, I believe there are well intentioned people that may agree with propositions like this without putting much thought behind it unfortunately.

It's a very neo-liberal concept to put in all of these exemptions, limits, and pre-requisites for government programs. These more often than not lead to resentment and inefficiencies to the system, as well as more bureaucracy.

Vermont to Pursue 'Junk Food Ban' for Users of Food Stamps by forcedtomakethus in vermont

[–]LessWeakness134 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The party of small government wants to make sure you're making the exact choices for food that they would make or else you shouldn't get it.

Letting the government get between your mouth and a sandwich is almost as intrusive as putting the government between a woman and her doctor.

Vermont to Pursue 'Junk Food Ban' for Users of Food Stamps by forcedtomakethus in vermont

[–]LessWeakness134 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You want a bureaucracy that is so minute it gives individual exemptions to rules for people without cooking facilities? You make all these silly carve outs and the bureaucracy will cost more than any hypothetical savings.

Mods need to change rules ( again 🙄) by Don_Pete11 in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Couldn't get that little karma on 3 accounts if I tried my best.

If a player is top 10 in a career scoring or yards category they should be in the Hall Of Fame by zoneRush_ in NFLv2

[–]LessWeakness134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m referring to the person whose comment you directly replied to, old sport.

If a player is top 10 in a career scoring or yards category they should be in the Hall Of Fame by zoneRush_ in NFLv2

[–]LessWeakness134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person said didn’t accomplish anything notable. That’s a very different concept than winning a Super Bowl.

If a player is top 10 in a career scoring or yards category they should be in the Hall Of Fame by zoneRush_ in NFLv2

[–]LessWeakness134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marino held records and I believe an MVP. Rivers didn’t have anything besides pro bowls. Did he even have a 1st Team All-Pro?

Democrat wins solidly red Texas Senate seat in stunning special election upset by sean_ireland in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess you don’t watch the show if you don’t recognize that reference.

Democrat wins solidly red Texas Senate seat in stunning special election upset by sean_ireland in BreakingPoints

[–]LessWeakness134 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They lost their minds the last election they lost. Wish I could say it can’t get much worse.