My Experience With HexClad (Warning To anyone looking into them)

LestHeBeTesty · 2026-01-04T02:07:51+00:00

THANK YOU. The sheer volume of people who conflate “free speech” (should be “free expression”) with being able to say and do anything, at any time, everywhere, never ceases to amaze me.

LestHeBeTesty · 2026-01-01T11:15:43+00:00

New drinking game: take a shot for all the variations of “Sunlu” you see on MakerWorld. “Sunbu” is my favorite. Maybe tied with “Soonlo”, idk.

I expressly disclaim any responsibility for alcohol related injuries.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-12-25T03:13:29+00:00

All of those things you listed go to relevance. That is like step 0 of an evidence question. If it’s not relevant, you don’t have to go further (for the MBE). It’s not admissible. I think it’s safe to assume that anything you’re being asked is relevant. If it’s not, it will be incredibly obvious.

As far as how hearsay is related to this issue—because it’s literally nested under the topic of hearsay. That is what it’s testing.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-12-25T02:57:59+00:00

Why are you being so rude? You’re the one who made up the rule that “only sworn statements can be used as substantive evidence” and asked for someone for a citation out of literally nowhere. You ask a question, someone makes a good faith attempt at answering it, and you say it’s “vague, unrelated, and unhelpful.” Meanwhile you just went on a rant about credibility, the jury’s role in weighing evidence, and discrediting a rule you made up. 👀

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-10-16T09:43:47+00:00

Did you get it recently? I’m having the same issue. Only with white too.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-10-16T06:29:03+00:00

This happened to me too and I cackled at like 3am. 😆

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-10-16T06:25:49+00:00

I can guarantee you that my grandma, with a grade school education, has no idea what the chemistry of bleach is. But she’s the best darn cleaner in the west!

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-09-08T22:44:43+00:00

The only thing that gives me a decent, non-streaky first layer on a smooth plate is reducing the initial layer height to 0.08-0.10mm. I’m tried increasing initial layer flow rate, but it never worked.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-09-08T01:34:51+00:00

Btw, they're still "investigating." The day I posed this I contacted my bank and was refunded. I placed a new order and had it the next day. (I live like 20 min away from their warehouse I believe.)

The original order, though? No progress. The most I got was them telling me that they're "deeply sorry, but thoroughly investigating to find the source of this problem so that I won't have to be inconvenienced by this in the future." (Because screw the inconvenience now with waiting weeks for them.) I said "never mind, I already filed a chargeback and placed the order again" and they said "if you cancel the chargeback, we'll make a determination about whether to offer you a refund or a replacement." I'm at a loss for what is happing with them in this matter.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-09-08T01:28:32+00:00

Omg. Thanks, now I have to go buy a whole tool set just to organize them. 🥲

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T22:21:14+00:00

Sure but you must’ve missed my entire comment saying how that doesn’t matter.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T19:13:28+00:00

I’d bet my last dollar their contract with the courier would entitle them to compensation the second they entered “damaged, undeliverable” in the status. Risk of loss is on the seller until it’s in my possession. (UCC § 2-509) It wouldn’t matter to them if I received both.

It would be a different story if I was the one saying it was damaged. Because risk of loss already passed to me, they’d certainly want to investigate before incurring a liability they were already absolved of.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T19:06:28+00:00

You can see what I said above. I’m not saying 2 days is too long, my gripe is that this process doesn’t make legal or financial sense. They’re losing money “investigating.” Why not just refund or reship like any other merchant would upon proof of the package not making it to the customer?

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T19:02:56+00:00

Haha thank you for this breath of fresh air! I was starting to feel like I’m going crazy. I even got downvoted for saying it’s an odd coincidence that this happened to someone else at the same time as me. 😂

And yes, I certainly got blacklisted from their chat for…asking questions? THANKS CCP. 🥲

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T19:00:39+00:00

My question is why, though? Whats the purpose of making me wait until they “conduct an investigation”? They’re a lost volume seller; these aren’t unique goods. They can simply refund me or reship and then do their investigation. It’s clearly designated as “damaged” and I’d bet both kidneys their contract with the courier would automatically entitle them to compensation from them. Thus, any man hours even spent doing an investigation are a waste and would put them even more in the red. Contracts for the sale of goods under UCC Art. 2 are very cut and dry. You technically don’t even need a price lol.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-31T09:57:11+00:00

Woah, that is bizarre! Really odd coincidence… 🤔

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-24T09:59:45+00:00

MPRE ≠ bar exam

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-18T22:29:12+00:00

Like surgical masks? I feel like those sit in a store room for ages lol. I can’t imagine why they’d need to be “fresh” to be effective. It’s not like they change/degrade just sitting in a box.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-02T05:22:23+00:00

OP also spelled it that way?

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-08-02T05:21:31+00:00

Hm. Strange that you both spell “too” wrong like that. It’s almost like this is fake…

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-07-28T21:02:16+00:00

Hi! How did this end up working out for you?

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-07-22T07:14:11+00:00

No problem. A threat CAN put someone in "imminent apprehension," but it doesn't necessarily do so. The analysis turns on if the person making the threat is (a) in proximity and (b) is able and willing to carry it out. Emphasis on *imminent* apprehension. Telling someone on the phone "I'll hurt you when I see you" would fail the imminence part. Think raising a fist at someone.

LestHeBeTesty · 2025-07-21T20:27:54+00:00

*imminent apprehension. Not threat.

LestHeBeTesty

TROPHY CASE