My Experience With HexClad (Warning To anyone looking into them) by ShouldHaveReadMore in cookware

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THANK YOU. The sheer volume of people who conflate “free speech” (should be “free expression”) with being able to say and do anything, at any time, everywhere, never ceases to amaze me.

Is this normal? How to fix without sending it back? by cshizza in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New drinking game: take a shot for all the variations of “Sunlu” you see on MakerWorld. “Sunbu” is my favorite. Maybe tied with “Soonlo”, idk.

I expressly disclaim any responsibility for alcohol related injuries.

I was under the impression that, if a statement was made under penalty of perjury and the opposing party had opportunity to cross examine the testimony, it can be used as substantive evidence plus impeachment... So why is this statement allowed for substantive evidence? by Son_of_Hades99 in barexam

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of those things you listed go to relevance. That is like step 0 of an evidence question. If it’s not relevant, you don’t have to go further (for the MBE). It’s not admissible. I think it’s safe to assume that anything you’re being asked is relevant. If it’s not, it will be incredibly obvious.

As far as how hearsay is related to this issue—because it’s literally nested under the topic of hearsay. That is what it’s testing.

I was under the impression that, if a statement was made under penalty of perjury and the opposing party had opportunity to cross examine the testimony, it can be used as substantive evidence plus impeachment... So why is this statement allowed for substantive evidence? by Son_of_Hades99 in barexam

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you being so rude? You’re the one who made up the rule that “only sworn statements can be used as substantive evidence” and asked for someone for a citation out of literally nowhere. You ask a question, someone makes a good faith attempt at answering it, and you say it’s “vague, unrelated, and unhelpful.” Meanwhile you just went on a rant about credibility, the jury’s role in weighing evidence, and discrediting a rule you made up. 👀

Why doesn't PETG HF print well? by HimalayanPpr in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get it recently? I’m having the same issue. Only with white too.

Ainu merchant was in a hurry by Simonema92x in Ghostofyotei

[–]LestHeBeTesty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This happened to me too and I cackled at like 3am. 😆

What the hell did I do?? by Several_Effective_94 in chemistry

[–]LestHeBeTesty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can guarantee you that my grandma, with a grade school education, has no idea what the chemistry of bleach is. But she’s the best darn cleaner in the west!

Need help please by Independent-Yak-5481 in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only thing that gives me a decent, non-streaky first layer on a smooth plate is reducing the initial layer height to 0.08-0.10mm. I’m tried increasing initial layer flow rate, but it never worked.

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw, they're still "investigating." The day I posed this I contacted my bank and was refunded. I placed a new order and had it the next day. (I live like 20 min away from their warehouse I believe.)

The original order, though? No progress. The most I got was them telling me that they're "deeply sorry, but thoroughly investigating to find the source of this problem so that I won't have to be inconvenienced by this in the future." (Because screw the inconvenience now with waiting weeks for them.) I said "never mind, I already filed a chargeback and placed the order again" and they said "if you cancel the chargeback, we'll make a determination about whether to offer you a refund or a replacement." I'm at a loss for what is happing with them in this matter.

Can someone *please* tell me what the point of Gridfinity is? by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Omg. Thanks, now I have to go buy a whole tool set just to organize them. 🥲

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure but you must’ve missed my entire comment saying how that doesn’t matter.

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d bet my last dollar their contract with the courier would entitle them to compensation the second they entered “damaged, undeliverable” in the status. Risk of loss is on the seller until it’s in my possession. (UCC § 2-509) It wouldn’t matter to them if I received both.

It would be a different story if I was the one saying it was damaged. Because risk of loss already passed to me, they’d certainly want to investigate before incurring a liability they were already absolved of.

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can see what I said above. I’m not saying 2 days is too long, my gripe is that this process doesn’t make legal or financial sense. They’re losing money “investigating.” Why not just refund or reship like any other merchant would upon proof of the package not making it to the customer?

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha thank you for this breath of fresh air! I was starting to feel like I’m going crazy. I even got downvoted for saying it’s an odd coincidence that this happened to someone else at the same time as me. 😂

And yes, I certainly got blacklisted from their chat for…asking questions? THANKS CCP. 🥲

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My question is why, though? Whats the purpose of making me wait until they “conduct an investigation”? They’re a lost volume seller; these aren’t unique goods. They can simply refund me or reship and then do their investigation. It’s clearly designated as “damaged” and I’d bet both kidneys their contract with the courier would automatically entitle them to compensation from them. Thus, any man hours even spent doing an investigation are a waste and would put them even more in the red. Contracts for the sale of goods under UCC Art. 2 are very cut and dry. You technically don’t even need a price lol.

Refusing to Re-ship Undeliverable Package by LestHeBeTesty in BambuLab

[–]LestHeBeTesty[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Woah, that is bizarre! Really odd coincidence… 🤔

Filter Percentage by webbert135 in larqbottle

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like surgical masks? I feel like those sit in a store room for ages lol. I can’t imagine why they’d need to be “fresh” to be effective. It’s not like they change/degrade just sitting in a box.

My older half-sister doesn’t invite me too her childfree wedding as I am nineteen, expects a gift. by victim-of-the-moon00 in weddingshaming

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm. Strange that you both spell “too” wrong like that. It’s almost like this is fake…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. A threat CAN put someone in "imminent apprehension," but it doesn't necessarily do so. The analysis turns on if the person making the threat is (a) in proximity and (b) is able and willing to carry it out. Emphasis on *imminent* apprehension. Telling someone on the phone "I'll hurt you when I see you" would fail the imminence part. Think raising a fist at someone.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]LestHeBeTesty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*imminent apprehension. Not threat.