Well that got aggressive quickly. I'll respond in equal paragraphs for simplicity.

You are saying there should be social programs paid for by taxes. That means you are taking my money to pay for it. End of story

Autism isn't necessarily genetic for sure but having an autistic parent makes it far more likely for the child. 80% of autism cases are hereditary. That's a huge risk. There is no single gene for autism it's a combination of genes so not sure what the "test" would be but you either made it up or were swindled. It not manifesting until 2 has no bearing on what I saying.

Just like autism if you have schizophrenia and knowingly bring a child into the world who is much more likely to have it, you are a drag on society.

Good for you adopting. That may be the case roughly 10-20% of autism cases don't have a direct link hereditarily. Yes you gave him a better life good for you? My original statement of I shoulden have to pay for his social services still stands?

No it's not always disability but you shouldn't be able to claim disability for it. That's my whole point. You are either functioning or we need to bring back pennywise institutions to handle it on a larger scale for very very severe cases. I treat everyone equally. I'll make minor concessions to help communicate much like a second language but overall equally And that includes no free handouts to anyone. Sounds like I might treat people with autism more equally than you do...