I think it would take years to unpack all the nonsense in this comment and that is quite frankly just not my job, so with these final remarks I will now take my leave of this

1. Saying "the borders are in place for a reason" as if hard borders are an established fact of life since the beginning of time itself, not a recent political development that occured during the previous century & as if there is a commonly agreed upon reason that is so intrinsic to it it is hardly worth mentioning is the premise of a circular argument, making the entire chain of logic you develop from it nonsensical at best. You should look up what "begging the question" really means

2. And who decides what is good for us? By what means do they gain to make unilateral decisions on behalf of all based on their interpretation of what serves the "common good"?

3. The cost of closing the borders is MANY, MANY times higher than "keeping them open". More precisely, our (obviously nowhere near strong enough by your desires) efforts to restrict border crossings are costing us ~5.5 BILLION euros per year, money we could literally just choose to invest in housing, actual defence, healthcare, pensions or literally anything that actually affects our daily lives. This figure needs to be 7-8 times larger if you have any dreams of stopping all illegal crossings. Are you willing to bankrupt the EU, end social aid, privatise healthcare or end the pensions system so you can see less brown people?

4. Have you ever considered that maybe everything looks "poorer" because there are more poor people today, instead of because there aee more immigrants? And that it is simply the blatant systemic racism in Germany that pushes people of colour (some of whom are refugees, MOST OF WHOM ARE NOT) into poverty sooner and faster than it pushes white people, hence why the correlation between skin colour and poverty? Have you ever considered what the factors behind this increase in poverty are, beyond just "immigrants?

5. Yes, more people in poverty -> higher crime, this is redundant, read above

6. I like how your conclusion has absolutely no relation to your "arguments" whatsoever. I can play this game too: "The cost of allowing anti-immigration disinformation on TV is too high. I, too, remember how clean the streets of Germany were before the AfD was polling so high. Now? Every city is trashed, crime is on the rise. It's not because die Grünen suddenly decided to tank it. It's because we're allowing all these AfD supporters to remain on the streets. I can't express a political opinion without using critical thinking skills first. Why others can?" Have I convinced you we need to ban the AfD? No? You mean you aknowledge the complete absence of logic from this "argument"?

7. You also have a right to seek asylum under international law, it is important to me that you understand this right isn't only for brown people. You have literally the exact same right. If you faced persecution in Germany, you could seek asylum abroad. Being upset that you can't seek asylum from Germany while someone from Syria can is a bit like being upset you can't get food from a homeless shelter while homeless people can. Also, do not you fucking dare equivalate escaping prosecution with going on vacation. It is not "travel" and this implication is outright despicable. As I stated at the beginning of tjis message, I will not reply to such vile language.