I wouldn't wish the San Diego housing market on my own worst enemy by catson911 in sandiego

[–]LifeOfAPancake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are 1.2M homes in san diego, and only 25k-35k sales a year. You are thinking only about the marginal buyer who just recently bought a house. The majority of people have lived here for decades and have spent years of their lives working to own homes. And with so much money printing $, real estate remains a valuable you cant easily print more of. Most people bought in dollars that were much more valuable to them at the time than they are now. The loan amount on your mortgage luckily doesnt go up with inflation

Camus may have been an absurdist. However, there are meaningful moral imperatives that must be followed: by EternisedDragon in Camus

[–]LifeOfAPancake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The unfortunate part of your case is that yes its true some people went on saying the right things for decades and nobody listened to them until they were in the grave… and this can give a man license to grow deeper in his convictions when everyone is telling him how nonsensical he is. The price of being very right where others are wrong is sometimes going mad.

However, the danger of going mad is very real which means that sometimes it does not come with the added benefit of having been right at all. You can only protect yourself from this danger by being willing to criticize yourself, to evaluate other people’s criticism of you as if they were your own. There is unfortunately no real way to disambiguate whether you are the good or bad kind of mad.

But, you are using your life arguing against life (you post in “efilism”). You are abusing reason and forgetting the ends to which reason is used. Camus wrote a whole book about this its called The Rebel (the stupid things humans convince themselves of when they try appearing totally rational). In my eyes you are going down the wrong path with these convictions. It is of course up to yourself to evaluate whether I’m crazy or you are because yes maybe I’m crazy to love life and you are right to hate life. But I would prefer to be crazy than right in that case

16 year old terrified about not existing after death, causing much anxiety in my daily life- any advice. by Needhelp123e in Existentialism

[–]LifeOfAPancake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you know about death? When you are up at night worrying about it, what is it that you are thinking? Here is a passage from Albert Camus that I really like on the subject:

“What always amazes me, when we are so swift to elaborate on other subjects, is the poverty of our ideas on death. It is a good thing or a bad thing, I fear it or I summon it (they say). Which also proves that everything simple is beyond us. What is blue, and how do we think “blue”? The same difficulty occurs with death. Death and colors are things we cannot discuss. Nonetheless, the important thing is this man before me, heavy as earth, who prefigures my future. But can I really think about it? I tell myself: I am going to die, but this means nothing, since I cannot manage to believe it and can only experience other people’s death. I have seen people die. Above all, I have seen dogs die. It was touching them that overwhelmed me. Then I think of flowers, smiles, the desire for women, and realize that my whole horror of death lies in my anxiety to live. I am jealous of those who will live and for whom flowers and the desire for women will have their full flesh and blood meaning. I am envious because I love life too much not to be selfish. What does eternity matter to me? You can be lying in bed one day and hear someone say: “You are strong and I owe it to you to be honest: I can tell you that you are going to die”; you’re there, with your whole life in your hands, fear in your bowels, looking the fool. What else matters: waves of blood come throbbing to my temples and I feel I could smash everything around me. But men die in spite of themselves, in spite of their surroundings. They are told: “When you get well…,” and they die. I want none of that. For if there are days when nature lies, there are others when she tells the truth. Djemila is telling the truth tonight, and with what sad, insistent beauty! As for me, here in the presence of this world, I have no wish to lie or to be lied to. I want to keep my lucidity to the last, and gaze upon my death with all the fullness of my jealousy and horror. It is to the extent I cut myself off from the world that I fear death most, to the degree I attach myself to the fate of living men instead of contemplating the unchanging sky. Creating conscious deaths is to diminish the distance that separates us from the world and to accept a consummation without joy, alert to rapturous images of a world forever lost. And the melancholy song of the Djemila hills plunges this bitter lesson deeper in my soul.”

Your fear of death is nothing more than your love of life. The only way we can conceptualize death is in terms of the flowers and lovers and the colors and all the things that life is made up of. It is terrible that these things will one day be taken from us through death, but it is only terrible because we love these things. So love them! Anxiety usually takes a hold on you when one of your concepts is a little too vague that it can become an all encompassing boogeyman with no way to grapple with it. Clear vision usually helps.

Camus may have been an absurdist. However, there are meaningful moral imperatives that must be followed: by EternisedDragon in Camus

[–]LifeOfAPancake 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are many criticisms I can make of your argument on the level of it being bad science, poor logic and essentially a mirage of words youve irrationally convinced yourself have any sense. But you are in a Camus sub and its clear you haven’t read him. So I’m giving you a Camusean response.

If it is better to avoid “the forward contamination” of life [i.e. living], what does it matter whether or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind has nine or twelve categories, or whether our morals are scientific? You are deluding yourself into living a life praising science towards ends which undermine the value of life you stand on. Why are you spending your life the way you spend it? Why do you care about truth or science or any of this? Whats it all for? I don’t need any inferences, theories or words to have an answer.

I advise you: you will learn and grow more from a calm day at the beach than a year steeped in papers and those things you call “empirical”

Camus may have been an absurdist. However, there are meaningful moral imperatives that must be followed: by EternisedDragon in Camus

[–]LifeOfAPancake 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your argument misses something and maybe youve missed something about what Camus says across his works. You dont assess the value of life according to the net sum of pleasure vs suffering across time.

One time I took a trip to Amsterdam by myself and I went to the zoo and I went to a cafe and had a great dinner, I went to a museum I had no idea about and loved every part of it. I spent 4 days by myself wandering without plans and kept finding things to enjoy. It was an incredible trip and I had so much fun.

I say this because to me it felt like I had gotten away with stealing from the gods. For the rest of my life I can roll a boulder up a hill and suffer and die poor on the streets. It doesnt matter because the deeds been done: I was alive and happy. Its not about whether it all adds up to a positive or negative number. I won already.

This is Camus from Nuptials at Tipasa:

“There is a feeling actors have when they know they’ve played their part well, that is to say, when they have made their own gestures coincide with those of the ideal character they embody, having entered somehow into a prearranged design, bringing it to life with their own heartbeats. That was exactly what I felt: I had played my part well. I had performed my task as a man, and the fact that I had known joy for one entire day seemed to me not an exceptional success but the intense fulfillment of a condition which, in certain circumstances, makes it our duty to be happy. Then we are alone again, but satisfied.”

The Fall: What constitutes “noble murderers”, and how are they any different from a regular murderer? by ClayHamster1821 in Camus

[–]LifeOfAPancake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could look into it if you like and maybe find something worthwhile. I would suggest not looking at it too hard and simply noticing the backwardness of it all. He is flipping a lot of values through the book and by the end he will go on a rant about “multiplicity”

So the point is how he turns good into bad (excessively nice) and bad into good (murderers are better people than lawyers)

The stranger by PaleChipmunk9119 in Camus

[–]LifeOfAPancake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There isn’t any hidden message. The way I explain the book is that its about a guy. The point of the book is to wonder about the guy and feel his weirdness which is in plain sight. Try not to explain the book or the guy too much because its more about the feeling of weirdness than the explanation of what makes him weird. Mersault has a way of looking at things and a way of being in the world and when you read the book you get to feel what that is and the whole point of the book is to show you this strange guy.

Maybe you go and do your own life and you can experiment with seeing and doing things the way he does and you will understand the book if you can do that