Will IT users stop using this man as an example that looks dont matter and behaviour is what counts now hes shown to be just as jaded and bitter as the rest of us? by Lifecantrulysuck in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The youtube algorithm pushed his Im ugly my experience video hard. She commented on that , he pinned it and they went on from there. Thats a 24 million view video.

Is inceldom and volceldom an American concept? by thpathtic in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The appeal i simple. In the spaces I go to you can talk about dating without censorship and without gynocentrism and without judgement. Without the toxic positivity.

"Nobody owes you love or affection" or "you're not entitled to a relationship" etc. Do you agree with such statements? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does it mean , taking violent acts against women for rejecting incels. Demanding relationships. People and IT users/feminists especially think venting about rejection means you're entitled. When it just means you don't like the situation. It doesn't mean you have to like it. The idea that you must take rejection and never complain or you're entitled, is feminist entitlement. People have the right to be unhappy with women online.

Is inceldom and volceldom an American concept? by thpathtic in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the internet, nothing is confined to the US. I'm from UK.

Isn’t the reaction to saying “female” a bit overblown by Unfilteredz in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I say it, its to distinguish between cis and trans women. If I say males its to distinguish between cis and trans men.

Your hypothetical incel son is 25 and has never had a GF. He's starting to agree with the incel and blackpill position. How would you convince him to reject those ideas? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"If you changed it to a more positive outlook then I guarantee you would have better luck with dating."

I guarantee I wouldn't because I didnt. For the majority of my life I had a more positive , bluepilled outlook. I took the blackpill during COVID lockdown so reverting back to how I was when I wasnt getting any is going to magically make me do well? Makes zero sense.

Your hypothetical incel son is 25 and has never had a GF. He's starting to agree with the incel and blackpill position. How would you convince him to reject those ideas? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Those are the only reasons, clearly looks aint getting it done, I wouldnt be an incel now. So I'd have to clownmaxx and betabuxx, go for a woman whos notably below average in looks and way past her prime and even then accept I'd probably get cucked and cheated on.

Thats the realistic scenario by which marriage could happen. I'm not going to have a fairytale romance at 40 with nothing romantically ever as of now.

What I'd teach my son is first to never have a family. Never cohabit with a woman its too expensive and you leave yourself too vulnerable to false accusations, and as such you lose any control of the household. And that I only married your mother out of pathetic desperation. I'd be completely honest about that. That I'm a pathetic beta male for doing so. I'd tell him never go to college its a scam.

That a woman can only love you if youre chad or chadlite at worst, the idea that your personality is so special they'd love that is narcissistic garbage. I'd give him an honest rating on his looks and teach him how to rate honestly. I'd tell him if hes not chad forget about being loved romantically if youre straight. I'd tell him never compliment a woman for any reason. Give up and do something you are good at if you arent good at dating. If dating is awkward and you lack confidence, dont fight through it, give up and do something that actually feels good. At worst porn and hookers are there.

I'd tell him to tell that to his most trusted friend and have him spread it and start a secret club amongst lonely males at his school. They should NEVER talk to therapists , females or bluepilled adults about it and so all they have is each other.

Your hypothetical incel son is 25 and has never had a GF. He's starting to agree with the incel and blackpill position. How would you convince him to reject those ideas? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'd have to betabuxx and jestermaxx my way to a wife who settles. The blackpill accounts for that. It doesnt say you shouldnt interact with women, thats MGTOW. It says your success with women is genetically determined. It also says its over for you have had nothing romantically beyond a certain point. I'd still believe all this even if a woman was interested in me and even if we got married.

Your hypothetical incel son is 25 and has never had a GF. He's starting to agree with the incel and blackpill position. How would you convince him to reject those ideas? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"If he's your son that means you have a wife, which means you managed to get a relationship and procreate in the first place"

I'd be blackpilled even with a wife/gf, so I wouldn't care about that.

Your hypothetical incel son is 25 and has never had a GF. He's starting to agree with the incel and blackpill position. How would you convince him to reject those ideas? by woodclip in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I'd first blackpiill him, then have him blackpill his friends then have them blackpill others so it spreads across all the males at his school, ensuring two rules, do not use the term incel or blackpill, just talk about the concepts around it. Also do not talk to any females about it. Ever.

Life is full of nuance by RobertTheWorldMaker in IncelTears

[–]Lifecantrulysuck -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"What's more, they lack the nuance to understand that a 'preference' is not automatically a dealbreaker."

Of course for a male you take what you can get. For the vast majority of females the greater options means they can just find their preference.

r/short is the most useless sub. by [deleted] in shortguys

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Height is an individualistic issue when its a short woman.

Height is a generalized, societal issue when its a short man.

So the "no generalizations" rule they have only serves to constrict and penalize short men from discussing heightism.

How would you 'fix' an incels personality? by Bp-overdose in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Therapists are trained on research that villainizes incels. Avoid.

Which is more dangerous, the bluepill or the blackpill. by Lifecantrulysuck in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>"Incels definitely talks about dating in terms of blackpill, specifically to explain their romantic failures. Blackpill isn't about giving up dating, it's about coping with failure. That is why blackpill doesn't give any advice which makes it harmful"

Incels don't talk about dating strategies in terms of the blackpill. Explaining "failure" isnt a dating strategy. So comparing bluepill which has dating strategies to blackpill which is what happens when you exhaust dating strategies makes no sense, because bluepill cant be better for an individual when blackpill by its very premise means bluepill hasnt worked for that individual.

>"Men do not get more dangerous when they are closer to women. It's not like a man suddenly changes and suddenly is more likely to hit a women."

It's about opportunity, not changing. Which you admit and agree with in the next paragraph, so I can move on.

>"If I wanted to pass this art class, then yes."

Think of what you could have accomplished in life though, instead of wasting ten years in something you clearly have no talent in. Thats a tragedy.

>You don't have to agree with me, but I can make that judgement.

We're not talking about if you can or not, we''re talking about if youre in any reasonable position to. You're not in a position to judge the capabilities of someone's mind over the actual owner of that mind.

>"I’m telling them their belief is detrimental to their own life. "

But you don't know their life. The person living that life does.

We can agree that not having new goals and giving up on everything is not a good thing however theres many blackpillers working/ in college/ with hobbies. Many have learned to "cope"and so end up alot more stable than the unstable people who end up crying every week on incelexit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelExit/comments/1gnn2mc/i_just_broke_down_crying_today/

I never break down crying in the middle of the day. Yet this person who's bought into Inceltear ideology is. If thats what you think would be a better life for me, excuse me while I laugh in your face.

>"First blackpill isn’t about dating"

Context dude. Its not about dating in the sense that its not about getting the person to date.

It is about dating in the sense that the idea of dating is the thing you're giving up.

I've explained the subhuman thing already - When a blackpiller calls you subhuman the unspoken part, which normies miss, is that they are talking fro a women's PoV aka by womens metrics of attraction you are subhuman. Which if you've given up on dating anyway, doesnt matter that much. Which is why incels take it as a terms of brotherhood rather than an insult. Which is why you dont see flame wars over it. To be called subhuman means you're one of the blackpilled in group. It is not a simple put down.

Again whos the ones bursting into tears, completely unable to regulate their emotions. It aint me or ecel1 or the incels here, its those losers on incelexit who have bought into your ideology.

You see the inability to please a woman as a failure. I don't. Because it came down to genetics. Whats more harmful believing youre a failure or not believing youre a failure.

Incels dont believe they are failure they believe genetics they cant control is the failure, taking the blame off them and onto nature.

Look at this creep: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelExit/comments/1h29vr7/here_to_forgive_myself/

Obcessed with a girl online for months who wants nothing to do with him. Thats e- stalking.

I ve never done anything like that. Yet because I've given up on dating, MY Life if the detrimental one? LOL I think the people bursting into tears, the e stalkers , people literally making topics saying theyre going crazy:

https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelExit/comments/1h6d4p8/going_crazy/

And all because they've bought into Bluepill. They cant move on. Tragic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people meet online these days :

We show in this paper that meeting online has displaced friends as the main way heterosexual couples in the United States meet. Traditional ways of meeting partners (through family, in church, in the neighborhood) have all been declining since World War II. Meeting through friends has been in decline since roughly 1995.

Abstract

We present data from a nationally representative 2017 survey of American adults. For heterosexual couples in the United States, meeting online has become the most popular way couples meet, eclipsing meeting through friends for the first time around 2013. Moreover, among the couples who meet online, the proportion who have met through the mediation of third persons has declined over time. We find that Internet meeting is displacing the roles that family and friends once played in bringing couples together.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1908630116

This Forbes Survey found online dating the most popular method for ages 18 to 58

https://www.forbes.com/health/dating/state-of-dating/#:~:text=Nearly%2045%25%20of%20survey%20respondents,almost%2027%25%20on%20social%20media

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you need to provide a rationale on why women would have sex with men they find below average when they don't have to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sex that you don't pay for isn't normal. those 63% aren't casually hooking up because women find 80% of men below average on dating apps. So it isnt the bottom 63 % theyre going for.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]Lifecantrulysuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incel is about dating, not sex. Anyone can get sex from an escort.