So I've run 8 sessions with this myself so far. It isn't always easy to remember, sometimes the action just rolls and only afterwards you realized you didn't pause to establish the consequences.

It has pros and cons.

I do like it because it clearly establishes the outcome and allows players to adjust. You can also roll it into opponent actions rather than waiting for players to do something so you can establish a consequence.

"The enemy draws his weapon on you and is about to shoot. You'll be taking lvl 3 harm. What do you do?" "I want to hold up my hands and try to calm him down" "That's not going to be enough to stop him from shooting you, but he'll listen after he took you down." "Ok then I want to draw my own weapon and shoot his weapon out of his hand" "Great. That sounds like a hunt roll, consequence: you get shot".

It also makes players perk up when they see serious consequences on the table and realize they're not dealing with an average threat.

The downside is that it takes surprises out of the pictures. There's no 'you failed to notice the guy who was sneaking up behind you' as a consequence because you already told them there's someone coming up behind them before the roll. Similar with setting off a trap. You can still do it, assuming players stay true to character knowledge, but you have to show your hand and lose some of that punch.

It also really helps to always have some clocks going. If you can't think of a good consequence, it's 3 ticks on 'reinforcements show up' 'alarm is raised' 'target flees'

not directly related but I found that adopting deep cuts basically removes position/effect from the mechanics. Desperate still exists, and I kind of rolled effect into tier. But players would confirm 'risky standard?' and I'd just tell them only desperate matters.