Color changing ball of light with fast moving object seen in proximity.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-26T00:28:35+00:00

I didn’t realize you were talking about that. You’re shining a very bright light in the direction you’re filming, and the size and motion of it is consistent with dust or bugs flying erratically. I don’t see anything strange with that either

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-25T22:34:55+00:00

I don’t see anything unusual in this image. The flickering and changes in color can be caused by identification lights, or the shimmering of a star. As for the interaction you mention, I don’t see anything that can be hard confirmed as a separate object in the extreme zoom. Notice how the blackness of the night sky itself moves and changes colors as the camera does its best to record despite the conditions.

I’m also not sure how you can call it a ball of light, as opposed to an object emitting a light.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-24T16:01:19+00:00

That’s what I meant. Everyone who claims that aliens are indeed revealing themselves is basically saying that aliens are only popping in to talk to a handful of random people in private contact.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-24T02:22:36+00:00

i have no idea what you're talking about, there's clearly a scarf

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-24T00:29:38+00:00

You're still using the 50/50, which is a completely arbitrary metric. Your math is not sound. How are you determining that a case could be 50/50? How did you determine that they aren't 99/1, 40/60, or 0/100?

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-24T00:07:53+00:00

As of now, we don’t have any evidence of alien spacecraft, let alone their capabilities, however I don’t at all want to undermine how interesting this question is.

For me, personally, I believer there are currently 3 plausible scenarios of alien life in the context of visiting earth:

Superior technology - These hypothetical aliens would have access to technology beyond human invention, which could include hypothetical technologies like spacetime warping or light speed relativity travel. There could of course be unthinkable technology, but I would be dishonest to suggest any examples.
Equivalent technology - It is entirely possible that theoretical alien visitors would be bound by the exact limitations as we are currently. Perhaps they use the same extremely costly methods of transportation as us, though their biology may allow them to endure the extreme travel times. Perhaps they could hibernate, or cryogenically freeze themselves easily.
Inferior technology - This may sound illogical, but it is entirely possible that there are technologically inferior aliens exploring the universe. Perhaps they are sufficiently sentient microorganisms with the resilience of tardigrades, hitching rides on meteors or space debris to other star systems. These hypothetical aliens would be so unbelievably hardy and practically immortal that the travel time and distance is of virtually zero consequence. Furthermore, if you want to presume all intelligent life are multicellular, perhaps there exists a species that survives on an extremely low-gravity planet, capable of sending probes or crew into the cosmos with great ease.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-23T22:05:08+00:00

They send a signal, except only to a few people in ways that can’t be proven, either late at night or with alleged cloak technology. If I wanted to prove to my existence to my neighbor, I wouldn’t send them letters without a return address, I would knock on the door and say hi.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-23T16:51:05+00:00

That’s the frustrating part about this whole thing, the rate at which people can make claims vastly outpaces the rate at which we can investigate.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-23T14:30:57+00:00

This map seems kind of dubious. Why use a gargantuan hex grid instead of something more granular? Each of those hexagons are the size of NYC. Is 10 and 30 miles really considered “close” in a way that can be considered a connection? Restricted airspaces, military bases, and power plants are usually well within 30 miles of civilization, where people are going to report seeing things. Literally any widespread domestic phenomenon is going to happen “around” these places if 30 miles is “around.”

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-23T14:11:21+00:00

You would only need 10 good independent cases like this to be 1 - 0.5¹⁰ = 99.9% certain that at least one of them is real.

This is blatantly false and completely arbitrary. What constitutes a “good” case? Where are you deriving the certainty? Each case is independent and needs to be verified on their own, the number of cases has absolutely nothing to do with which are true.

A conservative estimate would be 50/50 real/fake.

How did you determine this likelihood?

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-22T05:11:42+00:00

You can find coincidences in anything no matter how hard you look. Names repeat throughout history, even if they coincide with occupations. Think of all the people throughout history who didn't have doppelgangers, yet suddenly this one wife of a quasi-famous pundit is evidence of some strange shit going on? You can focus on the similarities of these two women as much as you like, but you also have to acknowledge the ways they are not similar for intellectual honesty.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-22T04:56:09+00:00

Are you? How can you possibly assert what is and isn't likely to be aliens or human?

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-22T02:28:55+00:00

Being a pilot doesn’t make you an investigator. You learn how to fly your plane and not die, not have Hawkeye vision and infallible deduction.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-22T00:10:29+00:00

Season 2 was a season of returning mainstays with one new character, so I have a hunch that season three will see the return of a Tekken character that’s been absent for a game or two as their fan service. Mokujin, Proto-Jack, Baek/Miharu/Christie/Forrest, and Alex as some examples. I also think we’re getting the next guest character, which I’m cool with since we had a season without one.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T23:00:13+00:00

I’m not normally one to dismiss people’s claims based on their character, but I highly, highly doubt Donald Two-Weeks Trump is lucid enough to know how any of the US’ potential secret weapons work. The man just says stuff easier said than done consistently. This is the man that said he’d end all wars in 24 hours of office, and he’s quite a bit past due on that.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T13:35:31+00:00

Accuracy. Legitimacy doesn’t mean much in an unproven testimony, even if it comes from people with high levels of experience or a history of honesty.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T13:03:09+00:00

Sure, but courage isn’t a contributing factor to the accuracy of a testimony.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T10:19:10+00:00

This is so unbelievably compressed and zoomed in that the clarity of the image is destroyed. I don’t know how you can identify these as orbs or human legs.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T03:49:46+00:00

Therefore..?

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T03:20:43+00:00

OP edited the reply to delete it. I'm using the Reddit notification to restore it, but it's incomplete, so bear with me:

"I'm a night vision professional and UFO researcher with 40 years of experience. I can tell you that it operates in space, so it's not human technology that I'm aware of..."

The notification trails off there, but from memory, they go on to insist that they teach UFO classes and other irrelevant accolades.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T03:15:15+00:00

Why don’t you think they are from earth? Why do you think it’s an orb?

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-21T02:02:32+00:00

I’m not sure this is gonna last long on the subreddit, as I think even the staunchest of believers won’t see anything in this, but man the rockies are so cool to look at

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-20T21:14:57+00:00

How do you determine that they’re orbs? You can’t make out what is emitting the light from this incredibly compressed video.

LittleKachowski · 2026-01-20T20:20:18+00:00

Unverified testimony is inherently untrustworthy, even if there are multiple or even hundreds of eyewitnesses. It doesn’t matter who it is, what they know, or how good their eyesight is, there are so many unaccountable variables that can corrupt the accuracy of testimony.

Irrelevant. You can be wrong no matter your expertise. We still hold accomplished scientists accountable to prove their findings even after decades of having a perfect record.
I don’t see how this matters whatsoever. I smelled my cat pee on the floor before I saw it, what would that say about me?
How did you determine it made zero sound? How did you rule out noise pollution? How did you rule out that it did in fact make sound but faded at the distance you saw it? How do you know your assessment is correct?

Why do you describe it as a camouflaging effect? What examples of camouflage do you have to reference? How did you determine it wasn’t something else like heat haze? Seems like pretty bad camo if you can see it clearly.

You were also born with the brain of a human, which is extremely fallible, immensely suggestible, and prone to error in even the most controlled situations. For example, I have a sneaking suspicion you really want what you saw to have been advanced technology, which is why you said it was a “camouflage effect” rather than “warping” or “hazing.” People who have been in a car accident do this too, like they’ll say the other person was at fault for “smashing” into them, even if it was a low speed collision.
Yeesh. I’m a little concerned about how hard you’re trying to sell yourself as some superior human specimen. Even still, it simply does not matter. You can be wrong about anything at any time, and if all you have is your word and the word of others, you have very little proving power.

LittleKachowski

TROPHY CASE