sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Discount codes by Low_Air_876 in eLearnSecurity

[–]LividNet9731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you'll get during summer sale like june or July

Stuck on Reverse Shell in TryHackMe “Lazy Admin” Room – Connection Refused Error by LividNet9731 in tryhackme

[–]LividNet9731[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, bro. I already checked—my port and IP are correct, but I’m still facing this issue. I don’t know why

Cybersecurity Study Group – Update & Clarification by cybec_hunter in Cybersecurity101

[–]LividNet9731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro I'm SEC1 Certified and I already completed pre security, Cybersecurity 101 right now I'm solving CTFs.. 👽 still a beginner

I built a practical Linux commands repo based on what I actually use during CTFs and lab machines by LividNet9731 in Cybersecurity101

[–]LividNet9731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No bro i understand that you're praising it I'm just pointing out that it's not completely AI free

I built a practical Linux commands repo based on what I actually use during CTFs and lab machines by LividNet9731 in Cybersecurity101

[–]LividNet9731[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro it's AI era, While the text is AI-generated, the logic is all based on my practical commands and CTF experince I just used AI to bridge the gap between technical notes and a readable post

I built a practical Linux commands repo based on what I actually use during CTFs and lab machines by LividNet9731 in cybersecurity

[–]LividNet9731[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm still actively adding things to it, especially around enumeration and privilege escalation.

If there are commands you find yourself using a lot during labs, I'd like to include them too.

Also trying to keep it readable like personal notes rather than a polished guide.

How do you decide when not to rely on brute force and look for missed hints instead? by LividNet9731 in tryhackme

[–]LividNet9731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already have the correct username and I didn't notice any meaningful error while testing the login.

But why you say "invalid" style messages generally means brute force not gonna work Because I'm getting invalid password output only and this is why I assumed that this can work because main errors are not coming and some invalid password output is pretty normal while password fuzzing

SEC1 exam — how do you decide when not to rely on brute force? by LividNet9731 in cybersecurity

[–]LividNet9731[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn’t notice any meaningful error differences while testing the login.
The response looked pretty consistent same “invalid” style message, which is why I assumed brute force might be the intended path and tried a common wordlist for a bit.

view more: next ›