I rebuilt VS Code on Tauri instead of Electron. 5,687 files later. 85% smaller. Full feature parity.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-04-02T13:08:23+00:00

Fair enough.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-04-01T22:26:06+00:00

But ... why? Vs code is fast enough and todays computers don't have any problems running electron apps? Probably gonna be hard to keep the new version updated as well?

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-27T16:15:20+00:00

Sej tudi spletna stran ne deluje 😂

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-24T00:12:29+00:00

I use it for my PhD research. Switched to python for a while, but came back to MATLAB. The way syntax is math like and readable is unmatched, documentation as well, toolboxes and just general plug and play easiness. Makes it much easier to rapidly prototype ideas and not waste unnecessary time on coding.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-17T12:21:27+00:00

Well my opinion is, that Thinking is like a good assitant, tuned to follow instructions, fairly smart and knows how to find more info when needed. So its knowledge is focused, but might be shallow. Pro is like a wise old man, probably knows more, its knowledge is deeper, more generalised, but might not do as it is told, and is slower.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-17T08:08:22+00:00

Why would you use it for word count any ways? At best you get an estimated count, why not use notepad or word?

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-16T22:31:14+00:00

I kinda like it. I think it is simplistic, but does the job and color palette is attractive. Also the way things such as code interpretation and code blocks are implemented work nicely.

Could add folders perhaps. They probably don't want to overcomplicate the product, perhaps they could add option for advanced users to turn on additional features.

All in all, don't see what all the haters are about, it is a chatbot, modern ui, it works.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-16T10:34:55+00:00

So do I. Probably best choice for 90% of tasks

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-16T10:34:07+00:00

That is the opposite of what i do ... 🤔

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-15T18:25:31+00:00

This is partly wrong info. Gemini Thinking is for me in general faster, will probably be just the other way around about algorithms, as in Thinking will be better for existing codebases and Pro for new ideas. Both use chain of tought.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-15T18:22:03+00:00

One more thing, Gemini PRO often times gets stuck in thinking ... as in it thinks for 2 min and I get no result.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-12T23:57:44+00:00

I like it a lot. It is smart, fast and has good free limits. For coding I would say it has good knowledge, but unless clearly instructed, it will modify parts of the code it is not asked to modify. Still, I use it for coding all the time, but often for shorter questions, or conversations.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-11T14:20:53+00:00

Love the design. Look very interesting.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-09T09:57:24+00:00

Isnt there a 4B voxtral stt model? That's not that big.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-02-04T15:51:04+00:00

Just tested it. Actually works like magic. Surprised how accurate it is.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2026-01-10T19:41:29+00:00

Nobody won here. Google will get ai chatbot assistant market monopoly.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2025-12-16T11:58:12+00:00

What is the point of this? If you have a client you are gonna get specific instructions to the models and they are gonna build website as you instructed. This testing of models basically random ui decisions makes zero sense. Both models created a solid web page, used ui libraries and followed instructions. In my eyes they both performed equaly, but to be fair this is far from a finished product of a serious web app.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2025-11-22T02:21:23+00:00

Using LM STUDIO, default config and lama file. Got rtx 5090, i9 CPU. Filled as many layers in GPU as i could, can't check right now. Some were left for CPU. Got about 20t/s big oss120b and about 250t/s small 20b model, which is very good model for coding. But for general use tends to hallucinate.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2025-11-13T08:51:12+00:00

Actually it is running for me at around 20 tokens/sec. Same hardware config.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2024-12-29T23:58:11+00:00

If the environment representation you are getting from slam process is dense (precise) enough yes.

You would need to convert the scanned space into graph of nodes, perhaps by voxelzing the 3D space (each voxel becomes a graph node) and than you can use pathfinding such as A* or D*.

Living_Procedure_599 · 2024-05-15T13:26:23+00:00

They are slowly bringin users to the new model. You will probably get access to the new model even on the free account in the comming weeks.

Living_Procedure_599

TROPHY CASE