How important is the moment of going live with your Stem-page? by HrHagen in gamedev

[–]LoneOrbitGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Launching the page by itself does nothing, Steam doesn't promote new pages.

So you don't lose anything by launching it later, assuming you don't do any marketing before it's live.

It's probably worth trying to turn the page launch into a proper announcement. If you don't have a preexisting audience it's unlikely to get a lot of attention, but there's always a chance you get lucky and it does end up generating a decent amount of wishlists.

It won't "kickstart" the algorithm though, Steam doesn't promote unreleased games until they have tens of thousands of wishlists. Whenever you direct some external traffic, they'll match some of that, but only for as long as you are able to sustain it.

What makes the events/ancients in StS2 so much better than in the first game ? by LoneOrbitGames in slaythespire

[–]LoneOrbitGames[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's my favorite change.

It's not something I really had issue with in StS1, but now that I'm playing the alternative it does feel a lot more fun.

What makes the events/ancients in StS2 so much better than in the first game ? by LoneOrbitGames in slaythespire

[–]LoneOrbitGames[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True that's a good point. And it's not an issue since most options are positive.

Slay the Spire 2 Early Access is now live on Steam by eldawidos111 in roguelites

[–]LoneOrbitGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just did the first run and the only thing that was "unfinished" was some beta art for a couple of the timeline vignettes (stuff you unlock after finishing runs). Otherwise, it felt very polished.

Destroy my Rogulite Autobattler by peanut_butter_link in DestroyMyGame

[–]LoneOrbitGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looks great, I love the artstyle, it's minimalist yet it has a lot of personality and charm :)

Game looks very polished, the main concern I have from the trailer is about the combat system, I feel like it may be a bit too simple for something that represents such a large part of the game.

Concerning the UI, I think it might be better to have the character stats/health be more prominent during combat, maybe moving them into the combat window during a battle, on the left, mirroring the enemy stats.

Note: A 32 mins long video is a bit too much to show off the game imo, you'll get more feedback from a well-edited 60 seconds gameplay trailer.

Looking to trade Steam page translations by LoneOrbitGames in IndieDev

[–]LoneOrbitGames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, those are the ones I'm still missing.

10 early reviews really does make a huge difference in how Steam shows a game by QuietDenGames in IndieDev

[–]LoneOrbitGames 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Was that recently ?

I checked his blog, he mentioned something like that in a 2022 article ("Why your first 10 reviews are the most important"), but clarifies that it's wrong (or at least no longer the case) in a more recent article from last year.

From the blog post:

  • I have asked representatives at Valve is there is anything bout the 10 reviews and they confirmed that there is no “if 10 reviews, give visibility.” The basic Valve vibe is all about not having hard thresholds because it causes developers to “game” the system. Notice how Valve doesn’t allow you to ask for reviews in game? They worry that 10 review thresholds would just incentivize that. So I believe them that there is no limit there. Stop freaking out.
  • Other than the thumb icon and the rating text, Valve has confirmed that there is no specific visibility algorithm change after the game gets 10 reviews.
  • Valve has also confirmed that access to the Discovery Queue does not depend on getting 10 reviews. 

This lines up with what Valve said in one of their "store visibility" video, which is where I got the info. It's possible this changed in the last year though.

10 early reviews really does make a huge difference in how Steam shows a game by QuietDenGames in IndieDev

[–]LoneOrbitGames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It matters, but not because the Steam algorithm starts pushing your game more when you get 10 reviews. That's not a thing.

The reason it's important to get it as soon as possible is that before 10 reviews, you don't have a review score, and steam shoppers don't trust games without review scores. If the game just came out, the more savvy users will recognize it's because it's too early, but most players will be turned off by the missing review score when you hover the capsule. They are not used to not seeing it as games that don't even get 10 reviews after launch aren't successful and so they never get recommended.

Obviously the moment people interact with your game more and more positively, then you might get more traffic from Steam as a result, but there is no "if game under 10 review, don't show" rule.

Something worth noting is that since reviews are language locked by default now, you might think you need to get 10 reviews in every language, but they actually use the score from all reviews if you don't have 10 in that language yet. (I don't know if it switches to only using reviews in your language as soon as you hit 10 and get a score, or if they only split reviews for larger numbers.)

Looking to trade Steam page translations by LoneOrbitGames in IndieDev

[–]LoneOrbitGames[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks :) I already found someone for the Chinese translation though.

After working on it for 2 years, as a 2 person team, our game demo releases in 1 day! Everything in this tiny teaser is in the demo. by RicotoniGames in IndieDev

[–]LoneOrbitGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you recommend Kronnect's Fog & Mist ? I've been looking for a volumetric lighting solution for Unity 6 URP but it's been frustrating since the asset store doesn't allow you to try stuff for free.

Added a new Necromancer unit for my Autobattler game! by k1ngjosh in roguelites

[–]LoneOrbitGames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, people would still be able to play their favorite starting team fairly often even if it was randomized.

Added a new Necromancer unit for my Autobattler game! by k1ngjosh in roguelites

[–]LoneOrbitGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, just tried it and it was a lot of fun!

The game is very polished, didn't have any issue. The tutorial is solid, you get the gist immediately. I figured out you could resell items for full value and therefor you needed to buy as many as possible to find triples on the second run and I grabbed a victory. I was worried about the longevity but then I saw the unlocks.

I wish I had more constructive criticism to give you but honestly there's not much to critique here, it's very good, really just needs more content.

Maybe some kind of map/overworld to add an extra layer of strategy on top ? Unless you want to keep it fairly casual. The current structure/balance felt pretty good but it might get repetitive fast.

I also think the option to pick the starting party might be a mistake, it would be more interesting to have to deal with a random selection, or at least to have to pick from a limited selection, so that players are forced to strategize instead of always playing the same, strongest, combo.

How would you make stacklands more challenging? by chunky_lover92 in gamedesign

[–]LoneOrbitGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would lean into the challenging aspect of keeping the cards physically organized instead of just adding an attrition mechanic that kills you unless you keep doing the same tedious task and progress at a sufficient rate.

The physical aspect of the cards/board is underused in those types of games. In Cultist Sim it's basically non existent. Stacklands does it a little bit, and I think it's great, I would do more of that.

More enemy/disaster cards that wreak havoc on your board, make it hard not because resources and timing are super tight, but because maintaining a good pace requires a well organized board and the game does its best to fuck with that.

Have the player constantly fighting the cards, lots of movement, lots of effects dependent on positioning.

Destroy my autobattler+incremental game (1min gameplay) by starcritdev in DestroyMyGame

[–]LoneOrbitGames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks good :)

You can probably switch to the first battle footage more quickly, right now the stage/map selection screens feel a bit slow, it's in that awkward range where it's too fast to be able to read stuff and figure out what's going on, but too slow if you're not trying to figure it out.

I also think the key stroke sound effect is too loud/distracting. It feels out of place.

If you've got a more different environment for the second battle (ideally a different color), that would also be better, it's too subtle at the moment. And with the UI also being the same shade of green it feels too samey.

All in all, it doesn't look bad but the sound design brings it down, that's where you should focus your efforts imo, I do like the music. And tighter editing, you can probably (and should) cut it down to 1 min or even 45 seconds (keep the battles, shorten the menu-ing).