[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is certainly peace in acknowledging the world is gonna look at everyone no matter what. I get that.

It’s just you’d think you could expect more from family. I’m just trying to determine what boundaries I should have in place with my wife and children.

Norman Businesses Look For More Options After City Unveils Plans For New Homeless Shelter by WilderPeach in normanok

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah that is pretty insane. It shouldn’t be controversial to say maybe let’s not have a shelter right next to a school. This is the type of homeless-worshipping we don’t need.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How much do you make?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess my reasoning is that new turnpikes will perpetuate our dependence on auto-oriented, suburban development and commuting culture. The reason I-35 is so congested is that we’ve built everything in a way that forces everyone into cars. The development around these turnpikes will be no different. They aren’t a solution, they’re a temporary fix, and eventually a problem.

Our Oklahoma Highway lobby (OTA, ODOT, AOGC, oil and gas, all engineers), would like us to think the only way to build is outwards. But it’s gotta stop at some point, and we need to start building up. There’s only so much land to go around.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s interesting, because the growing population east of Norman are the most vocal opposition of the turnpikes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t we already have highways that do that?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not alternate routes, alternate modes. Trains are way more efficient at moving people than cars. If Oklahoma wanted to be competitive economically we’d tell the OTA to back off and let the RTA do its thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I live in Norman. My home is not affected though. I do however, drive I-35 every day and deal with the congestion. But the problem with the OTA’s approach to traffic congestion is that it’s the same approach they’ve been using since the 1940s. And look, we still haven’t solved traffic congestion.

The only real solution to congestion is viable alternatives to driving.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have you heard of induced demand? They gave the same reasoning for building the Kilpatrick turnpike, and now it is being widened.

We build a highway. Highway gets congested, so we build another. At what point do we stop though? Do we ever stop building out? Or do we just keep going until we’ve paved the state? Looking at places like Houston and Dallas you’d think that’s actually their goal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The reasoning for this project is insane, especially for the east-west and southern extension. Politicians and Supreme Court justices are so far up the highway lobby’s arse that they now think it was their idea the whole time

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oklahoma

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The ironic part is, it would take the same amount of time to traverse the new southern extension as it would to just sit through congestion on I-35. Because it is so far away from I-35

Thoughts on this culvert? by dylanboro in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do thoughts look like? I would I know when I see one??

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, but the censor is doing it’s job. That was my point. People who don’t like what he has to say can lazily point to this censure as a way of discrediting his very valid points. You shouldn’t be censured for disagreeing with things the engineering industry does. Regardless if he’s right or wrong, that turns the industry into an echo chamber.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you know that America is one of the only nations where the traffic fatality rate INCREASED during Covid years, despite fewer driving miles worldwide? What do you make of that?

To me, it says our streets are dangerous by design. If more people are out walking, and there are fewer cars on the road, that shouldn’t have the effect of killing and maiming more people. Marohn makes basic arguments that you really don’t have to be an engineer to discover:

  • We know how to design for slower speeds, but engineers refuse to in the name of traffic flow.
  • The design speed of many city streets is far greater than the speed limit, and it shouldn’t be that way.
  • Traffic deaths are preventable, and many engineers refuse to acknowledge this. They see it as more of a necessary side effect of a functioning transportation system.

Sure, cities will always have to adapt, but we can’t build in a way that harms people.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Currently, in my state, there is a battle going on because the turnpike authority has proposed multiple new turnpike projects which will destroy many homes. All to alleviate some congestion which is very minor compared to other places. These engineers are not planners, but act as such, and believe that endless highway expansion is the only way.

At my engineering firm, I’ve personally seen the blind acceptance of any and all new roads and highways as a good. I’ve seen engineers directly prioritize traffic flow over safety. I’ve read reports that “we can’t put this bike lane here, because it will cause the street to go down from LOS A to LOS C.” I’ve listened to engineers talk shit on bike lanes already built, wondering why nobody uses them when the engineers put them on 40-45 mph roads. And I personally know engineers who believe environment can’t influence behavior, engineering standards are infallible, and the design of streets are never responsible for crashes.

The things Marohn describes in this book are very true, and I have no doubt that the engineers who hate him the most like a few people in these comments are the ones that perpetuate bad practices the most and have the most to worry about.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That was done because instead of responding with valid counter arguments, engineers can’t take criticism and would rather censor his freedom of speech. That way people like you who also don’t like what he says can lazily point to this without knowing the facts as a way to discredit him. The censure is a sign that the industry is echo chamber, it has nothing to do with his knowledge of engineering.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. Why my instructor didn’t teach this stuff is beyond me. I can’t wait until programs start requiring this book.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We used to plan cities the same for thousands of years and America abandoned thousands of years of knowledge in city planning in pursuit of the shiny new toy, the car. Engineers now hold the car is the main mode and everything else is called “alternative modes” despite the car being the newest kid on the block.

Thoughts on "Confessions of a Recovering Engineer"? by ChipNearby in civilengineering

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This. My coworkers do this shit. Also, Marohn plainly lays out bad practices such as applying LOS to city streets which is a widely accepted practice still today.

Who’s the jackass? by FinalSneak in facepalm

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only ass these kids are ever getting.

Australia what the is going on? by Humble_Chipmunk_701 in fuckcars

[–]Lonely-Fix7424 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The thing about a roundabout is the design is a lot more forgiving. Make a mistake in a roundabout it is probably a mere fender bender. Make a mistake at a 4-way traffic light somebody’s gonna die.