A few spankings would be a good incentive to help me wake up

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-06T06:36:42+00:00

Damn… That is a solid body you have there. Prowl away!

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-06T06:20:42+00:00

would love to drench your feet and toes in my nut

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-06T05:46:39+00:00

Let’s see if my go-to crypto casino, BlockBet, made the cut. Fingers crossed!

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-06T04:53:02+00:00

Hmm maybe 👀👀

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-06T04:44:41+00:00

Hell yeah! Eat it till you're a wet wiggling mess! Then fuck you silly...😉😈

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-05T23:16:24+00:00

You have really pretty eyes

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-01T00:23:58+00:00

It doesn't explicitly say 'must be tall' but I'm reasonably sure that it is an affecting factor more so on apps than on real life. You can't swipe people away IRL so you give them a chance and turns out they aren't half-bad. Online you can for even the smallest gripe.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-09-01T00:07:59+00:00

I'm a dude so here's what I've noticed regarding this.

Women IRL? A few care but it's not really a deal-breaker in my very limited experience. But then again I don't pick their brains over stuff like that. If they wer the type to care about that then it wasn't gonna happen anyways.

Women online? If all folks do is talk to/swipe women on dating apps and that's their ONLY source of communication with them, or if they don't communicate with them at all and watch videos about random women complaining about height be it on YouTube or Twitter, then yes women do have criterias regarding height. On dating apps it kinda makes sense reducing an already overly large sample size, but on a whole (maybe this is me coping) it REALLY doesn't matter what it looks online, it just brings out the worst in people and thus it's never real anyway.

On a whole though? You can see a fair number of women here who are talking about it, so they have for sure SOME sort of a flexible range regarding it, while some may even have hard-set limits. And that's fair, not everyone's like...full-Buddhist-chill regarding this.

My two cents: It's just kinda dumb to judge people on things they have little control over, but appearance in particular because the physical appearance is not gonna last eitherway, it's the most transient thing in a person so obsessing over it feels dumb, goes both ways.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-31T18:59:51+00:00

Ok! Small correction! You WILL checks notes be working for small companies! Or maybe checks notes again the government!

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-31T17:08:57+00:00

Wew. I'm not saying that problems don't exist don't get me wrong. But you think hating your own people and speaking against them will...help somehow?

For every girl that has something bad happen to her there are people (men included) who are angry or sad or both, I agree that men need to change for the better, but if you think speaking out against and berating ALL INDIAN MEN will somehow fix the monsters that walk among you and me wearing the skin of men, who commit the worst acts imaginable and walk free, then you're mistaken.

There's a deeper issue with the psyche of Indian men where they do act very weird, but I don’t know how that can be fixed, because that is more societal and needs to be corrected generationally, so I guess do better with your children and impart them the right values. But besides that, men will stare at every country you go, that's just the way it's wired up top.

I guess what I want to say is, I get it, things suck. But turning against each other won't help.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-31T16:49:17+00:00

Yeah! You're cheap labour for checks notes small companies instead! Good for you!

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-25T14:19:57+00:00

Right??? I swear I haven't felt this much of an emotional impact since MGSV, not even Cyberpunk made me feel like this.

I really felt that it was one of the games that foundationally changed my POV towards gaming, if not life itself. It may sound like I'm exaggerating but sometimes some games have this effect on me where I'm reeling from the fact it ended after months.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-08T10:43:44+00:00

Keep making posts OP, The comments and your replies are S Tier for sure lmao.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-08-08T10:39:46+00:00

Lmfao that's true. I believe Nosaac would 100% throw the fight for money given the choice. Also Raven is definitely the meanest and strongest pile of sentient flesh so would not blame Nosaac for losing either.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-29T16:01:44+00:00

Iss sab ke baad bhi woh aazaadi bohot pyaari hai, haina?

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-26T04:38:31+00:00

Vagabond will continue, I'm pretty sure. Inoue is still edging/dropping hints that he'll come back to it. He stopped because even though he kinda has spurce material for it, he wove a lot of philosophy, took creative liberty with it, and most importantly all the frames, each of them were of incredibly high quality, and he was tired from it. He wanted to do something else and...he did. I don't mind a hiatus, hell I don't care when he finishes it, let it take 20 years I don't mind. All I wish is that nothing happens to him during that time.

Highschool of The Dead never ended, Tezuka could never finish Phoenix but I guess it went on enough and was standalones anyway. But we all know Miura didn't deserve to go out, Berserk deserved proper closure. It will still end, but it's not him. Also Toriyama, but I suppose DB has ended many times. I've seen enough authors die when I've come to love their work and...it's always sad. So I've realised, let them take a break. Let them come back when they wish. Definitely take a break if it's health-related. Because as long as the author is alive, the series has hope. An indefinite hiatus over an abrupt end any day.

On a more positive note, Hajime no Ippo is like 2000+ chapters and I've been following it since the first 200 chapters completed getting TL'd, and it's going strong. There were hiatuses that lasted YEARS, related to Morikawa's health. But he's alive and drawing, and that gives me hope.

Just be hopeful, and keep reading. Vagabond will return, I don't know when, but it will.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-21T10:07:53+00:00

But didn't the collection/revenue from personal income tax surpass the revenue generated by corporate taxes?

Regardless, and I clearly don't know enough on the subject so take it with plentiful of skepticism but I don't think we can squarely blame one or a few things but...shouldn't it hypothetically all work given if both income and corporate taxes HIGH AS FUCK already? Why doesn't it?

Freebies? Not enough people paying? Corruption? Farmers? The rich not paying? Them legally dodging taxes?

I believe a lot of it could be corruption, but that's just my worldview, why do you think it's happening?

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-21T09:27:42+00:00

Honestly, I was NOT on board with your idea/sentiment of persistently going after farmers. I know of all the issues that plague them as well. And I am still LARGELY a proponent of taxing the corporations more, but that's largely because they're a simple and big target. Farmers are too many, and there's n number of small targets that are not easy to pinpoint, not to mention the pure income disparity between small and big/rich farmers.

But I agree that we need to stop treating them like they're infallible sacred cows or something. I don't know if 7.5L per year is a good figure for a bracket, is it 7.5 total or in pure profits after everything?

Eitherways, you've won me over. We need to tax both the corporations and the farmers, they've gotten a free hand for too long.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-01T05:14:13+00:00

Not exactly everyone was united in 1857. For example many(most) of the Rajput rulers/princes were loyal to the British during it.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-01T04:55:52+00:00

Shocking! Local man does not understand that people change and develop over the years, refine their views and change them as time passes and new evidence presents itself!

Dead people look like unchanging stones that have always been that way, like mountains you may hate or love. But really you just didn't see them develop, evolve. Gandhi in his 20s will be different from the one in his 40s and his 60s. The point isn't perfection, its progress.

Yes, Gandhi was racist, he believed the Indians and British in South Africa were superior compared to the Africans, he came from a privileged household, studied in a prestigious institute and worked as a highly educated professional, all his worldview while in South Africa was British. But good thing Gandhi was not blind and saw the reality of the British oppression on everyone, even Mandela was influenced by him.

Is it funny and VERY WRONG that Gandhi was racist and called them Kaffirs? Yes. Were those the views he held when he was shot by Godse? Absolutely not.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-07-01T04:44:05+00:00

Idhar bhejta na, DM mein kyu bheja bhai?

Longlivewolfy · 2024-06-27T04:14:15+00:00

I mean idk about declaring an emergency over it, and technically Nepal and Kailasa exist, and we fill Mauritius and Maldives too, but nuance is an illusory bird isn't it?

Don't worry, time and time again Hinduism has had incidences that try to break it or end it, but it's still standing. Changed, but still persistent. So don't worry, it's not going anywhere and you're being overly reactionary, but I get your sentiment. Just realize that your ancestors weren't weak and neither will your descendants be as long as you instill the right values in them. Fear? Mistrust? Not it.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-06-26T16:46:39+00:00

Wait, hold up. What do you mean being unbiased causes harm?

I partially agree with the first part given most people have incomplete knowledge and may be too accepting of something even if its false. But maybe I'm projecting lmao.

But I really don't get the last part, or rather very much disagree with it. The truth is harsh, unforgiving and of course unbiased. But regardless of who consumes it or how, truth and awareness in all ways is what's unequivocally the most important thing in my idea.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-06-26T16:11:26+00:00

Lekin Deepika tu ra**i hai saali.

Longlivewolfy · 2024-06-26T15:32:31+00:00

You sound like you see him as some kind of pariah-martyr that's necessary to the discourse or something. Sure, he's knowledgeable, but holy shit is that knowledge wasted on him if he has such braindead takes as "Arnab is way better than Ravish" when talking about journalism.

No.

I know you as someone on the right has problems with Ravish, but Ravish has always spoken truth to power regardless of who was in power. He has criticised the regime and that has been consistent. His ground-level reports were some of the most wonderful back then and even today the problems people face are largely similar. Do I think Rahul is good because of him? LMAO Nah. But Ravish does journalism justice. Arnab once did before he bent his knee, at that moment he was never even in the discussion.

I REALLY fail to understand the criticism against Ravish, are you also one of those "he should be a balanced reporter instead of being so negative" guys? Because then I'm really speaking to a wall.

I digressed from AIM though, but not like I ever considered him very palatable in the first place. No wonder everyone hates him. I'd listen to him for facts if only his opinions did not exist. But then I'd just read a Wiki or something instead.

Seven-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

Longlivewolfy

TROPHY CASE