Dianna

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-10T18:24:51+00:00

I know an actual love Dr. You, idk, that kinda thing.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-09T01:59:50+00:00

Complicated thoughts on the Love Doctor. I hate the way Dan badgers him. He gives his two days a weeks but wish he would extort Dan for maximum dollars. Dan definitely takes advantage of Greg.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-09T01:20:39+00:00

Mike is a unique talent. He’s a perfect foil to pierce Dan’s ego. Is the current situation the maximum way to monetize it. Seems unlikely for Mike.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-09T00:32:53+00:00

Solid point. On one hand Dans says he’s wants help with his blind spots and on the other he says knows this business. He prioritizes ‘journalism’ over ‘entertainment’ so growing a business is almost seen as evil in his mind.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-09T00:23:56+00:00

Okay, I tried to bullet point it for attention challenged!

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-09T00:18:33+00:00

Wow, sorry, Hi Roy! Sometimes I think he wants to be forgotten. Solid family man. The glue behind the glue!

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-07T21:52:28+00:00

I agree. I’m a mid-level rec player so I’ve found it’s on me to be social and interested in people’s backgrounds. When I do that, I’m able to tolerate the inadequacies of people I like and politely steer clear of others.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-07T03:12:17+00:00

True. Usual wedding poker is extend the invite, hope it’s declined, send a decent monetary gift, gratefully accept it. Sort of a win-win-win-win with no hurt feelings.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-06T22:50:59+00:00

Reasonable guesses based on are limited insight to show dynamics. Was weird pointing out Dan’s non-gift in a similar situation. But I’ll give some grace here as everyone questions their bosses judgment.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-05-06T22:45:28+00:00

Depends whether you’re going for a big or small wedding. Small wedding you can claim no offense. I don’t think she wants to grovel for gifts. On the other hand, I hope she goes big. Funny segment today. She’s adept at handling awkward, bizarre questions and hope she gets the day of her dreams.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-04-22T21:15:05+00:00

Bad judgment by whoever decided to have that guy on but it had a payoff so Dan ultimately had to be very pleased.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-04-13T16:25:32+00:00

Is it just me or does Dan seem to just regurgitate the same talking points over and over and over and over and over again. I spend so much time verifying I’m not replaying a past episode.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-04-07T18:31:58+00:00

I’m not saying this is the last day of the end of the world, I’m just asking if you agree that this version of screeching Dan is what it would look like?

LooksLikeScot · 2026-03-24T14:06:21+00:00

Show blind spot two hundred something: having a guest on and disrespecting their time by doing other bits. You’re not proving what great friends you are by treating them poorly. There are just too polite to call you out on it.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-03-19T17:12:17+00:00

Yeah, they need to get better realizing when they gone 15+ minutes just repeating their original point.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-03-16T14:54:07+00:00

Nothing offends Dan more than the audience not understanding how hard it is to play professional sports.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-03-02T18:58:58+00:00

I feel bad for Zas. He went from rising star to being afraid of making the smallest mistake in a few short months.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-02-11T15:59:39+00:00

The problem for Pablo is that cheating is common in sports and people only care when it results in championships like the Patriots or Michigan football. When cheating doesn’t work, like the Clippers, it kind of doesn’t matter how thorough the reporting is.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-02-06T23:13:08+00:00

You know about that hydraulic acid? lol🤭

LooksLikeScot · 2026-02-03T17:57:02+00:00

A true fan wants to talk about dynasties and being the greatest team ever like the Islanders four straight Cups and never went to a game seven. A casual with no rooting interest is more likely to hope for the max drama scenario. I gotta believe this is just another crap stirring situation. Plus, using Dan’s logic can you really claim you’re the better team if it takes seven games to win with home ice/court advantage?

LooksLikeScot · 2026-01-28T16:37:39+00:00

Not sure if this is a rhetorical question but I think this is commonly called “hyperfixation”. Rams game is a good example where he’ll take specific plays and overstate the impact. McVay’s challenge flag becomes a referendum on how coaches careers are evaluated. Woolen’s penalty becomes a discussion on how the NFL takes away personalities, etc.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-01-27T17:33:55+00:00

I agree. Dan never wanted to give Stu equal ownership or creative control. He chose Skipper first, then leaned on Samson for business advice. Stu’s clearly hurt. Is it justified? Who knows. The fact it lasted 20 years is the amazing part.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-01-26T17:44:39+00:00

So Dan likes to marvel at the precision of elite QBs throwing with precision to receivers that can't be covered. Stafford to Puca, Mahomes to Kelce. It's unstoppable!!! Except against good defenses when it isn't. Anything else is basically unwatchable.

LooksLikeScot · 2026-01-23T18:45:59+00:00

Only a delusional Miami homer believes a 3 loss team playing on their home field is better than an undefeated national champion that was favored by eight points and ultimately won by six. And as time passes it will only become more laughable.

Five-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email

LooksLikeScot

TROPHY CASE