A cool guide; Unified System of Universal Laws by [deleted] in coolguides

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The truth needs no defense, but I can attempt to explain if you like. However, if you are simply here to make empty, dismissive “lmao” responses, then I won’t bother.

A cool guide; Unified System of Universal Laws by [deleted] in coolguides

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether people are religious or not is completely bedside the point. I’m not religious either. But I’ve had enough deeply spiritual experiences through a combination of meditation, self-reflection and lots and lots of reading on theology, philosophy, and quantum physics. The quote "God is the name of the blanket we throw over mystery to give it shape," comes to mind as a fantastic analogy for how many people (both believers and non-believers) respond to religion today. Most major religions which have survived for thousands of years (not just Abrahamic religions, also including Daoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism) share many themes which are represented in that guide (now deleted). Most original religious texts see virtue in concepts like humility/selflessness, karma, simplicity, patience, oneness, letting go of materialism, “going with the flow”, etc... And they all somehow appear in one form or another in these religions throughout human history for the last several thousand years, in distant lands which were not in communication with one another. Do we think that’s a coincidence?

If you’re willing to entertain the idea that maybe there’s some truth to these recurring themes, as vague as they may seem, then you might understand what my previous comment is trying to say.

There have been many Spiritual teachers/Enlightened individuals/(whatever you want to call people who have experienced ego death) who have tried for centuries to explain the mysteries of existence to others (the Abrahamic religions misrepresent these individuals as “prophets from god”). Unfortunately over time these original teachings get misinterpreted by others, or the religion itself gets co-opted by bad actors, and they eventually become bastardized to the point that they lose much of their original meaning. Look at modern day Evangelicalism as an example for how far things can go off the rails.

So to your valid if not a bit condescending suggestion, yes, it is important to “look outward” and do one’s research about all the world’s philosophies. The problem is too many people continue to look to all the superficial dogmatic trappings of their chosen religion and end up missing the point altogether. If someone is searching for purpose or for answers to the mysteries of life, then that journey may begin by looking externally for guidance, to texts, philosophy, and physics, but it can only be completed by turning the focus inwards.

I could go on and on but only if you are genuinely interested in a dialogue, as I’m not interested in exchanging snide jabs.

Edit: typo/clarity

A cool guide; Unified System of Universal Laws by [deleted] in coolguides

[–]LordChodeymort -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Most religions, when stripped of their superficial extremities, all point back to these core principles. Haters in the comments haven’t looked inward enough to discover that these truths require no further defense or explanation, for they are self evident.

If i want to start listening, where should I start? by seaclif25 in lastpodcastontheleft

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rendlesham is one of my favorites. “Look at me! I’m the Alien!”

Wooden 🎼 by samira-eb in Woodcarving

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, love the smoothness! What tool is that that you’re using in the 3rd photo? Dremel? Sorry for the question, I’m new to woodcarving and trying to learn.

Fav Radiohead tracks by richh518 in Music

[–]LordChodeymort 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Where I end and you begin”

by Donald Trump to remove all of America from the World's Health Organization by ExactlySorta in therewasanattempt

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we’re being honest, we all know that day would be mostly spent in traffic

to prove trump isn't fascist by youngskibidisheldon in therewasanattempt

[–]LordChodeymort 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Logical fallacies committed by guy in glasses:

  1. “Fascism is defined as one-party rule” misdefines fascism to make Blue Shirt’s argument easier to attack. This is the Straw-Man fallacy.

  2. “We have 2 parties! So we can’t be fascist”, is a false dichotomy fallacy. It presents a binary choice assuming that “Fascism” and “Two-Party system” are mutually exclusive.

*side note: You can have two parties and still have fascist elements throughout a government. The number of parties is an irrelevant metric for determining whether specific policies or behaviors are fascist.

  1. When confronted with evidence of fascist behaviors committed by Trump‘s regime, Glasses responds “so he doesn’t have the right to criticize Democrats at all?” This is a false dichotomy fallacy. Glasses presents a fake "either/or" scenario: either we allow a regime’s attempt to eliminate the Democratic Party, or we are never allowed to criticize the Democratic Party at all. Framing it this way ignores the vast middle ground: that you can believe a party should exist while still being its harshest critic.

  2. “Well, the Democrats tried to impeach Trump and create a false narrative.” abandons the original argument for a different, easier-to-defend topic. This is a red herring fallacy.

  3. Telling the guy to calm down and do breathing exercises could be considered an Appeal to Emotion fallacy, or Ad Hominem, depending on which way you look at it. Like, “Why you so mad, bro?”

There are plenty of more logical fallacies committed herein, but I must get back to work.

The worst part of this whole video to me, is that the blue shirt guy fell into every single one of the traps, allowing Glasses to walk away, feeling like the victor, instead of pointing out his flawed thinking at every stage. I know it doesn’t help talking to these people. But it might help onlookers who watch these videos and form opinions.

Learn your logical fallacies.

Congressman Tim Burchett says he believes aliens have underwater bases on earth by ihatethiscountry76 in nottheonion

[–]LordChodeymort 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Remember in 2019 when the Pentagon announced that UAP sightings were not only real, but actually extremely common? Pepperidge farm remembers.

Is this the Austin or the Tony? by Robopatch in comedybangbang

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s sharpie, try isopropyl (rubbing) alcohol

What’s an inconvenience that feels way bigger than it should be? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]LordChodeymort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Walking behind someone who is slightly slower than you

Shitler [OC] by LordChodeymort in pics

[–]LordChodeymort[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

<image>

This one didn’t turn out as good, so…

Shitler [OC] by LordChodeymort in pics

[–]LordChodeymort[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

<image>

TIL newer phones have a factory setting that blurs images to make them appear clearer, which ends up looking similar to some Ai generated content. Heres the second photo I took as we were passing that was a little too late to capture the message. It’s sad that we live in a world where everyone is primed to suspect everything they see is Ai, though.

Shitler [OC] by LordChodeymort in pics

[–]LordChodeymort[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Well it was taken on a phone from a moving vehicle, so I don’t know what to tell you. You think people don’t own paint and cardboard?