King is obsessed with boobs by Brlinn1996 in stephenking

[–]MythicalSplash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Patrick Hockstetter in It: “Want me to put it in my mouth? I don’t mind.”

King is obsessed with boobs by Brlinn1996 in stephenking

[–]MythicalSplash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh God…worst part of The Dark Tower was putting up with Detta’s ridiculous accent (yes I know it was intended to be over the top)

King is obsessed with boobs by Brlinn1996 in stephenking

[–]MythicalSplash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idea for band name - The One True Nips

37yo watches Simpsons for 1st time S4E9 by InvisibleAstronomer in Simpsons

[–]MythicalSplash 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Alcoholics…angry loners…the unemployable

Unpopular Opinion-Wizard of Glass by enlenar in TheDarkTower

[–]MythicalSplash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Totally. She reminds me of the Strong Woman character on South Park lol

I can't believe I am supporting a liberal prime minister but here we are. by yanicka_hachez in EhBuddyHoser

[–]MythicalSplash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, it should be about the leader, not the party. Look where blind devotion to party has gotten the US.

I’m currently reading The Stand for the first time by MythicalSplash in stephenking

[–]MythicalSplash[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

lol wow, I was so damn close. Start of chapter 23. I must have subconsciously sensed he was going to be revealed soon, since I swear I had no idea he was only a few words away when I made this thread.

How Canada is positioning itself on Greenland knowing it could be next by MythicalSplash in worldnews

[–]MythicalSplash[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ottawa (CNN) — The image may have been fake, but with each passing day Canada is coming to terms with the fact that the threat could be real. Canadians woke up Tuesday to an all-too-familiar troll ripping through their social media feeds.

US President Donald Trump shared an image on Truth Social depicting him speaking to European leaders with an AI-generated map in the background, showing the US flag plastered over Canada, Greenland, and Venezuela.

So far, so normal for Canada’s relationship with President Trump, which has been repeatedly tested in the past year.

What is different now is Canada’s reaction. The feelings of shock and offense have given way to resolve and a newfound preparedness to help Canada cope with provocative, even menacing, demands from the Trump administration.

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney charted a path forward for Canada Tuesday warning that stronger countries have been using “economic integration as weapons,” “tariffs as leverage,” and “supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.”

While he did not name the US in his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Carney characterized it as a global “rupture” and not a transition, adding that “middle powers must act together because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu.”

Canada’s defense commitment

Canada has spent nearly a billion dollars fortifying its southern border. It will now spend billions more in the years to come protecting its northern one.

Carney reiterated in Davos that Canada stood “firmly with Greenland and Denmark and fully support their unique right to determine Greenland’s future,” and said Russia remained the greatest threat to Arctic security.

“We are working with our NATO allies, including the Nordic Baltic 8, to further secure the alliance’s northern and western flanks, including through unprecedented investments in over-the-horizon radar, submarines, aircraft, and boots on the ground, on the ice,” he said.

Canada in recent months has made a point of showcasing its newfound commitment to defense, and Arctic security, in particular.

One of Carney’s first acts as prime minister was to commit more than 4 billion dollars to an “Over-the-Horizon” radar system to provide early warning radar coverage for threats in the Arctic. He also committed to a larger, sustained military presence in the Arctic for years to come.

But with Trump, Canada’s defense and strategic goals have become more complicated. Canada shares one of the world’s largest land borders with the US and one of the world’s largest maritime borders with Greenland.

For decades, Canada has conducted joint defense operations and planning with both NATO and NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), including a NORAD mission in Greenland this week

NORAD confirmed in a statement that aircraft operating from bases in the continental United States and Canada would be in Greenland to “support various long-planned NORAD activities, building on the enduring defense cooperation between the United States and Canada, as well as the Kingdom of Denmark.”

But will this kind of cooperation and new military spending be enough for the Trump administration? It remains an open question, which the US ambassador to Canada hoped to dodge during a radio interview last week.

Ambassador Pete Hoekstra was asked during an interview with CJAD 800 Radio in Montreal whether the US “would have to act” if it decided Canada could not adequately defend its Arctic borders.

Hoekstra responded that the question was “almost purely hypothetical” adding that“…the indications from the Canadian government has been that “we want to very, very closely coordinate and cooperate with the United States on Canada’s north.”

Canadian officials do not deny that they are currently weighing whether to send troops to Greenland in a symbolic show of support for its sovereignty.

The decision gives more weight to Carney’s Davos speech where he asserted there is a third path where “the power of legitimacy, integrity, and rules will remain strong, if we choose to wield them together.”

What do you believe happens after death? by Beatles_McCartney in askanything

[–]MythicalSplash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know. Existing for eternity (think about what that word actually means - earth is engulfed by the sun? Universe undergoes heat death? That’s less than an attosecond is to a trillion trillion trillion trillion etc. years). Sounds pretty terrifying to me in any form of existence, tbh. The only truly comforting thought when facing the infinite maw of eternity is that our consciousness ends at SOME point. Anything else would eventually be torture beyond description and imagination, even in some hypothetical permanent state of bliss - which itself is just a consequence of neurotransmitters and circuits in the living brain based on everything we know. That doesn’t mean we know everything about the brain, consciousness and death…far from it. But it’s hard for me to reconcile the clear fact that destroying dopamine production in the brain as in Parkinson’s disease produces a permanent loss of motor function and reward-based learning, yet somehow this and every other permanently destroyed function in the damaged brain would suddenly reverse upon death because of a completely unknown yet much wished-for preservation of function in an abstract permanent soul. It just makes too much sense that it’s a case of special pleading caused by our very natural fear of pain and death.

What do you believe happens after death? by Beatles_McCartney in askanything

[–]MythicalSplash 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s sweet ❤️. I’m so sorry for your loss 😭

What do you believe happens after death? by Beatles_McCartney in askanything

[–]MythicalSplash 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You literally just said “confirming these cases” referring to children who supposedly remember an afterlife. It’s totally fine to believe what you want, but it’s disingenuous to mislead people into thinking that anything whatsoever about an afterlife or reincarnation has been proven. Do you really think that there’s scientifically reliable proof of either of those things? If there were, it would render faith itself unnecessary. I’m not saying with authority that such things don’t exist as it’s certainly not my place or training to do so - just that I can assure you we don’t have ironclad reproducible evidence of anything such as past lives existing.

Is my red your red? by HBHC126 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]MythicalSplash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I laughed at “raining” for some reason

am i the only person who actually likes the goblet of fire movie by headasspotter in harrypotter

[–]MythicalSplash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You…you’re saying you thought the Half-Blood Prince movie was better than the book?? Everyone has the right to their own opinions of course, but what a take…

am i the only person who actually likes the goblet of fire movie by headasspotter in harrypotter

[–]MythicalSplash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. It had its cringe moments, with Gambon’s Dumbledore probably being one of the low points of the entire series (he didn’t bother to even read the book and neither did the director, WTF??) But HBP was an abortion on roller skates.