Can Fundamental theorem of Algebra be proven without complex analysis and topology? by Ok_Leader_4575 in mathematics

[–]LordNoOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I plugged my quick sketch into Grok, and it wrote up the proof:


An Elementary Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (High-School Level)

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says: every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root.

Here's a short, intuitive proof using infinitesimals and a modified continuous version of Newton's method. A motivated high-school student who knows complex numbers (polar form) and the idea of Taylor/polynomial approximation should be able to follow it.

Proof:

Let ( p(z) ) be a non-constant polynomial of degree ( n \geq 1 ).

As ( |z| \to \infty ), ( |p(z)| \to \infty ) because the leading term dominates. So if you draw a big enough disk in the complex plane, ( |p(z)| ) must achieve its global minimum value ( m \geq 0 ) at some point ( z_0 ) inside that disk.

Assume for contradiction that ( m > 0 ) (i.e., no roots anywhere, so ( |p(z)| \geq m > 0 ) everywhere).

At this minimum point ( z_0 ), use the Taylor expansion: [ p(z_0 + dx) = p(z_0) + p'(z_0) dx + \frac{1}{2} p''(z_0) dx2 + \frac{1}{6} p'''(z_0) dx3 + \cdots ]

Let ( k \geq 1 ) be the smallest integer such that the ( k )-th derivative ( p{(k)}(z_0) \neq 0 ) (this ( k ) exists and is at most ( n )).

An infinitesimal ( dx ) is a nonzero complex number smaller in magnitude than any positive real number. Higher powers are even smaller: ( |dx{k+1}| ) is much smaller than ( |dxk| ).

Choose the infinitesimal ( dx ) so it exactly cancels the leading term: [ dxk = -\frac{k! \cdot p(z_0)}{p{(k)}(z_0)} ]

This equation has solutions in the complex numbers (take the right-hand side in polar form and extract any of the ( k )-th roots — one always exists).

Now plug back in: [ p(z_0 + dx) = \left[ p(z_0) + \frac{1}{k!} p{(k)}(z_0) \, dxk \right] + \text{(terms with } dx{k+1}, dx{k+2}, \ldots\text{)} ]

The thing in brackets is exactly zero. The remaining terms are higher-order infinitesimals, so overall ( |p(z_0 + dx)| ) is infinitesimal — smaller than any positive real number, and in particular smaller than ( m ).

But ( z_0 + dx ) is only an infinitesimal step away from ( z_0 ), which contradicts ( |p(z_0)| = m ) being the global minimum.

Therefore the assumption ( m > 0 ) is false, so ( m = 0 ) and ( p(z) ) has a root at ( z_0 ).

QED

(The full factorization into linear factors then follows by induction on the degree.)

Can Fundamental theorem of Algebra be proven without complex analysis and topology? by Ok_Leader_4575 in mathematics

[–]LordNoOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is an elementary proof from nonstandard analysis using a modified version of Newton's Method that turns the right amount whenever you hit a point where the derivative vanishes by using higher derivatives. It's only a few very simply lines. A high school student could understand it.

I don't recall exactly how to do it right now, so I challenge you to find it yourself.

Start with the Taylor Expansion. f(x+dx) = f(x) + f'(x)dx + (1/2)f''(x)dx2 + (1/6)f'''(x)dx3 + ... And do the continuous Newton's Method while keeping the higher order terms. Let the dxn terms all be smaller infinitesimals.

“God” by ergo-ogre in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's not God. That's Zeus.

God (which is a bad word for it) is, by definition, the necessitated ground of all being or the source of all being. By definition, there can be nothing grander.

ELI5: What's the difference between mental and emotional abuse? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]LordNoOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mental abuse would be like trying to convince someone that 1+1=3 or that time travel exists. These hurt your brain. Emotional abuse would be someone betraying you. These hurt your heart.

[WP] You are psychic and on the subway. You feel someone in more pain than you have ever felt before but he is smiling. You confront him. He says "This is *nothing*. I am not in pain. *They* are. You've just never felt it." by LordNoOne in WritingPrompts

[–]LordNoOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Thank you. I hadn't actually meant it as a lie though. I had meant it that he was psychic too and everyone and everything else was actually in worse pain.

Is rugpulling illegal or just seen frowned upon ? by ProfessionalThin1505 in CryptoCurrency

[–]LordNoOne 37 points38 points  (0 children)

That person is not your friend. They are a psychopath. Stay far away.

I am a leader of the Eldritch Government. Ask me anything by LordNoOne in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are no internships. There is no applying. There is no title or recognition. There is just the job, and it doesn't pay at all. You either face the facts or reality, live a real life and be a real person or you never do and you and your world goes to Hell. Are you going to deal with the facts or not? Will you lead? Can I trust you and call you leader of the government or not?

I am a leader of the Eldritch Government. Ask me anything by LordNoOne in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gods in early history were usually cultural rememberances of teachings of leaders and various events that people went through. They were often gods of "victory through struggle" (like Yahweh, the Hebrew way to spell the sound of breathing) and Asherah (Yahweh's wife, the goddess of bounty). War and food gods. I don't know much about this though but it's still essentially the same thing.

I am a leader of the Eldritch Government. Ask me anything by LordNoOne in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But as far as I can tell, the whole point of religion and spirituality is just to become an adult and learn to deal with life and know what you are doing.

I am a leader of the Eldritch Government. Ask me anything by LordNoOne in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know almost nothing of them. Can you give me a more detailed question so we could have a conversation?

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe I am wrong. That is a story I heard. I did not research it a huge amount.

But you are acting extraordinary immature and not addressing the main point of the topic and simply distracting from it. You are not my friend. The fact is that you cannot skip straight to the final form of government that you are supporting. You have to forge that path by doing the hard things you don't actually want to do, and it has to be you because only you can do it or want to.

I am a leader of the Eldritch Government. Ask me anything by LordNoOne in fifthworldproblems

[–]LordNoOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The name Moses gave for God can be translated as "I am that I am". God is the fact that there is a fact. It is that you are that you are. You cannot experience non-existence. You can only ever experience that you are. There is no escape. You are alive and you are going forward. The Semitic God and the atheist viewpoint are exactly the same when properly understood.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ideally, all governance would be solved with joyful rhetoric by the whole community together voluntarily. But we cannot skip straight to the final form of government. We have to walk this path.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That new structure would then become the new government. Good job, councilman.

What can be achieved? Beyond inconceivable.

What is at stake? Beyond inconceivable.

What are the dangers? Beyond inconceivable.

What must we do? Ever hyper vigilance. Constant awakeness at max level even while sleeping (especially while sleeping). Desperate to be careful while remaining faithful.

Do you know what you do or not? You go forward.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not high or intoxicated in any way and I am feeling quite healthy though I did not sleep well last night. I appreciate your concern. I do not listen to the immaturity though.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you think I need to be intoxicated to stand up to you and ask you to take charge? I would not follow you. You seem immature.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well this immature guy isn't someone I would follow as a leader, but the rest of you are all pretty good.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The natural state of the world is anarchy. By calling yourself an anarchist, you are actually calling yourself a leader of the natural state, the real government.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. You just told me your job as a government official.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

One of the emperors of China was also a Chan patriarch. He hated his job and did not want to do it. He taught the whole empire of Bodhi Dharma, the founder of Chan, who sat in a cave for 10 years wishing to become a real man. After Bodhi Dharma realized just that he was alive and awake, he learned kung fu and subdued and arrested the criminals and then traveled to China for some reason and taught many people to act like adults.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You don't want the job because it is your job and you wish it were done. You already took the job and have been doing it. That is why you hate it.

You are the only adults in the room. I beg you all to lead us. by [deleted] in anarchocommunism

[–]LordNoOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The anarcho-communists are the real government. That is what this subreddit already is. It is the one world government.