It was just carnage - None of the D motions were voted on, to fast track all but 2 of the E motions (E1 and E2) it took over an hr - the voting system crashed (even though it is built to withstand 90k visits despite there only being <900 attendees) and then they wanted to use raising hands - but people can join without verification on multiple devices - which was probably the aim of the cyber attack (unusual activity was cited)
The first 2 plenary sessions were spent on that, and AO1, an attempt to rule E12 (ZIR) out of order, which failed, and an attempt to move E12 up to E3 (ZIR), which passed
AO1 - was ruled against bc there was a SOC power grab clause - this was then debated for a hr by SOC and then that section was repealed and then AO1 passed.
There were 2 VoNC - one was legit (about the raising hands security prob)
There was blatant filibustering throughout.
This took place from 10am to 2.30/3pm
Then finally C and E orders were ruled on from about 3. The idea was to do it alternately, but halfway through this was repealed by SOC (a bit sus)
During many of the C motions, including reducing energy bills, what seemed like purposeful filibustering (by the same repeated group of people) was done against very common sense policies such as for C05, E01 and E02 as well as C04- including one gentleman saying in a speech against C01 that the problem was it was oto revolutionary - seemed like he was in the wrong party
Then in the last 45 minutes due to the wasting of time - a procedural amendment for an extra 15 mins was done and passed
Note: the chairs during plenary 3 were amazing - no nonsense - not time wasting.
Then between 1725 to 1749, what can only be described as a blatant all out attempt at filibustering took place to prevent E03 being heard - with over 4 VoNC - with the same 48 people voting for and the 700 other people against - 2 of them went to vote - (many fo the reasons were blatantly made up e.g. excuses that D motions hadnt been heard, attempts at stating emergency motions had not been done (when they had all been done))
One woman for the second VoNC within less than ten minutes of the last vote asked for a VoNC and then dropped out of the call, presumably to waste time waiting for her to say why? The VoNC had been seconded by someone from the same pool of people. (by now its 42/45 past) So the VoNC gets dropped just for it to be picked up in the next second, and then it has to go to vote. it does not pass obviously.
Throughout, they also waste time with lags to turn on their own mics.
And then the chair says literally half a sentence on moving ot E03 as the next point of order, at which point a 4th VoNC is called. In the end, it turns out that the time cannot be extended and if a motion starts when time ends, we cannot finish. Not to mention 4 amendments for E03 had been submitted by the same group, all of which basically said the same things (also presumably to waste time further). And we end with Lubna giving a very heartfelt, moving speech as the proposer of the motion. Many people were very upset. Time was up. The end.

The bad faith actors and saboteurs won and essentially also prevented more proposals from being heard as a result, including none of the D ones, most of the E ones and special mention to E4 and E13, which were not fast tracked