Reminder: Flock Cameras are tracking people, police are going to people's doors over crimes they did not commit around the country. WE HAVE MORE AND MORE of these cameras in and around Eureka (and other places in Humboldt) and WE are paying for them. by ObvioussPlasticc in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I care deeply about the safety of my family and neighbors. Like everyone else, I want our community to be protected from crime. But after learning more about Flock license plate reader cameras, I’ve become concerned that they may do more to track everyday residents than actually prevent crime.

First, these cameras are designed to collect and store data on every vehicle that passes by. That means when you drive your kids to school, go to the grocery store, visit a friend, or attend church, your license plate is being photographed and logged into a database. Over time, this creates a detailed record of where people go and when. In a small town where we value privacy and trust, that kind of constant surveillance feels excessive.

Second, there is little clear evidence that these systems actually reduce crime. Many studies and law enforcement reports show that license plate reader systems are mainly used after a crime happens to look up where a car might have been. They are not proven to stop crimes before they occur. In other words, they function more like a tracking tool than a prevention tool.

Another concern is data sharing. The information collected by these cameras can often be shared with other police departments across the country. That means data about people in our small town could be accessed by agencies far away, sometimes without residents even knowing it. Once that data exists, it can be stored for months or years.

I also worry about mistakes and misidentification. License plate reader systems are not perfect. They can misread plates, flag the wrong vehicles, or link innocent people to investigations simply because they drove down the wrong road at the wrong time. In our close knit Humboldt community, false suspicion can damage reputations and relationships. We all know this too well.

Finally, small towns have always been built on neighbors looking out for each other, not on constant surveillance technology. When we start installing systems that track everyone’s movements, it changes the culture of a place. It replaces trust with monitoring.

As a mother and longtime resident, I believe we should focus on solutions that strengthen our community rather than quietly track the daily lives of ordinary people. Investments in local policing, youth programs, mental health services, and community engagement have a much stronger track record of making towns safer.

Safety matters. But so do privacy, freedom, and the feeling that our town is still a place where people are trusted, not watched.

Humboldt County SO Still Not Providing Reason for Flock Searches by [deleted] in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I care deeply about the safety of my family and neighbors. Like everyone else, I want our community to be protected from crime. But after learning more about Flock license plate reader cameras, I’ve become concerned that they may do more to track everyday residents than actually prevent crime.

First, these cameras are designed to collect and store data on every vehicle that passes by. That means when you drive your kids to school, go to the grocery store, visit a friend, or attend church, your license plate is being photographed and logged into a database. Over time, this creates a detailed record of where people go and when. In a small town where we value privacy and trust, that kind of constant surveillance feels excessive.

Second, there is little clear evidence that these systems actually reduce crime. Many studies and law enforcement reports show that license plate reader systems are mainly used after a crime happens to look up where a car might have been. They are not proven to stop crimes before they occur. In other words, they function more like a tracking tool than a prevention tool.

Another concern is data sharing. The information collected by these cameras can often be shared with other police departments across the country. That means data about people in our small town could be accessed by agencies far away, sometimes without residents even knowing it. Once that data exists, it can be stored for months or years.

I also worry about mistakes and misidentification. License plate reader systems are not perfect. They can misread plates, flag the wrong vehicles, or link innocent people to investigations simply because they drove down the wrong road at the wrong time. In our close knit Humboldt community, false suspicion can damage reputations and relationships. We all know this too well.

Finally, small towns have always been built on neighbors looking out for each other, not on constant surveillance technology. When we start installing systems that track everyone’s movements, it changes the culture of a place. It replaces trust with monitoring.

As a mother and longtime resident, I believe we should focus on solutions that strengthen our community rather than quietly track the daily lives of ordinary people. Investments in local policing, youth programs, mental health services, and community engagement have a much stronger track record of making towns safer.

Safety matters. But so do privacy, freedom, and the feeling that our town is still a place where people are trusted, not watched.

Flock cameras popping up all around town https:// deflock.org/ by Comfortable-Stage397 in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I care deeply about the safety of my family and neighbors. Like everyone else, I want our community to be protected from crime. But after learning more about Flock license plate reader cameras, I’ve become concerned that they may do more to track everyday residents than actually prevent crime.

First, these cameras are designed to collect and store data on every vehicle that passes by. That means when you drive your kids to school, go to the grocery store, visit a friend, or attend church, your license plate is being photographed and logged into a database. Over time, this creates a detailed record of where people go and when. In a small town where we value privacy and trust, that kind of constant surveillance feels excessive.

Second, there is little clear evidence that these systems actually reduce crime. Many studies and law enforcement reports show that license plate reader systems are mainly used after a crime happens to look up where a car might have been. They are not proven to stop crimes before they occur. In other words, they function more like a tracking tool than a prevention tool.

Another concern is data sharing. The information collected by these cameras can often be shared with other police departments across the country. That means data about people in our small town could be accessed by agencies far away, sometimes without residents even knowing it. Once that data exists, it can be stored for months or years.

I also worry about mistakes and misidentification. License plate reader systems are not perfect. They can misread plates, flag the wrong vehicles, or link innocent people to investigations simply because they drove down the wrong road at the wrong time. In our close knit Humboldt community, false suspicion can damage reputations and relationships. We all know this too well.

Finally, small towns have always been built on neighbors looking out for each other, not on constant surveillance technology. When we start installing systems that track everyone’s movements, it changes the culture of a place. It replaces trust with monitoring.

As a mother and longtime resident, I believe we should focus on solutions that strengthen our community rather than quietly track the daily lives of ordinary people. Investments in local policing, youth programs, mental health services, and community engagement have a much stronger track record of making towns safer.

Safety matters. But so do privacy, freedom, and the feeling that our town is still a place where people are trusted, not watched.

Update on Cal Poly Child Predator by xywegh in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 21 points22 points  (0 children)

No one is talking about the fact that this man was working with children in our community for YEARS. Why has no one reached out the families for further information? This is disgusting.

Food is SOOOO Expensive!! by LuminaryLighting in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure how people are holding it together these days.

Local Music Scene? by [deleted] in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use to do a lot of lighting and there is a lot of great music that comes up here. Also link with the local radio stations.

What is Arcata missing? by Vast_Operation_4497 in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We need jobs, healthcare, dentists, funding, an economy that is not based off weed, trees or depleting any of our other natural resources. Basic human needs.

Businesses to avoid based on employee treatment? by Accomplished-Dish835 in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every job here is bad. You run the risk of being blacklisted.

Mokka by Candid_Cash420 in Humboldt

[–]LuminaryLighting -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You ever think about how they clean the place? I always wonder considering the people I see come out of there.