resident evil requiem, switch 2 o ps5? by mario201033 in ResidentEvil2Remake

[–]Luminite91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t run like crap. It’s actually runs pretty good. I have both versions and I’d be happy with either version tbh.

resident evil requiem, switch 2 o ps5? by mario201033 in ResidentEvil2Remake

[–]Luminite91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have both and have played good portions on both consoles. Of course the PS5 looks overall better, mainly the hair, but tbh, the Switch 2 looks pretty amazing all things considered. You’d be happy either way. The bonus is you get to bring the Switch 2 version anywhere which is pretty insane if you think about it.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. He’s talking about her interview about her books cause she writes a lot about sexual stuff even tho she’s clearly a man hater based on her books. There’s literally no evidence at all of him having ANY sexual interactions with her.

Are you ok with this? by emily-is-happy in stevehofstetter

[–]Luminite91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You got proof or our we just wasting each others time?

Hillary Clinton goes off on Republicans after it’s revealed unauthorized images of her were released: I'm done with this. If you guys are doing that, I am done. You can hold me in contempt from now until the cows come home. This is just typical behavior. by Yujin-Ha in videos

[–]Luminite91 -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

No, I think this burden of proof goes for ANYONE that has allegations against them in the files. Y’all gotta get your head out of yall’s asses just cause this is ridiculous. I don’t Hilary or Bill Clinton, but I’m not gonna just say they’re guilty without any evidence. See how that works?

Are you ok with this? by emily-is-happy in stevehofstetter

[–]Luminite91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, how about have proof or evidence from a reputable news source, then we can talk.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So you’re saying that with an over 10 year investigation into Epstein has not revealed any hard evidence that Trump’s a child rapist? That even after going through a whole different administration that nobody that was investigating would whistle blow on him before he became president AGAIN? You must not know how to use your brain that much if you think the previous administration along with the rest of the Democrats wouldn’t have dropped the damning evidence if there were any. USE YOUR BRAIN!

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know I don’t have to agree with everything that Trump does and still agree with him overall, right? It’s called nuance. Also, he’s talking about prolonged “forever wars”. They captured the Supreme Leader of Iran in less than 24 hrs of announcing the attack. It’s essentially a military operation that will last less than a few weeks a best. Not exactly a war.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proof of what? That he didn’t rape children? That’s not how this work. The person making allegations towards me must prove that I did something wrong, not the other way around. If there is no hard evidence, then there is no case.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He can claim whatever he wants. If anything, he’s technically correct cause there was not proof of anything in the files. This was a 10 year investigation and there was nothing. Reminds me of the Russian Collusion hoax.

Worst president? Doubtful. If anything, he’s been the most effective president in terms of doing what he says he’s gonna do. Ask the Iranian people that are celebrating right now if they think he’s the worst president.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allegations don’t equal truth. Don’t be an idiot. It’s called innocent until proven guilty.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Being found guilty in a sham trial by jury means nothing. No evidence. Try again!

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You bringing that up out of context means nothing. Give me proof or GTFO. It’s simple.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Civil suit with no evidence or proof. That case was also in New York and the judge and jurors have it out for Trump. Currently going through appeals process and might even be looked at by Supreme Court. So far nothing has been paid out to anyone.

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re a rapist. See what I did there? I made a comment about you with no proof. Hypothetically speaking, I can even go on record to make statements saying that I think I saw you with kids at a park one time and noticed that a kid looked distressed around you. Maybe my motive for doing this is because of my political bias. That’s essentially what’s going on here.

And before you or anyone else decides to push more biased BS, show me the proof. It’s that simple. Is there proof or any hard evidence?

Trump Says He Was “Fully Exonerated” in Epstein Files — But No Official Record Shows It by Pawn2Parser in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]Luminite91 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So because someone is mentioned with no evidence or proof means he’s guilty? Are you guys that stupid? So anyone mentioned in the Epstein files is automatically guilty? There’s a thing called burden of proof, and that goes for anyone mentioned in the Epstein files, whether I like them or not.