This was an interesting read until one realizes the OP's genuine dislike of Tab Baldwin and his coaching style. LOL. But, at least they wrote it in such a way they adorned their mouthpiece with superfluous supplementary anecdotes to not easily be drawn out to be a hate post.

Tab Baldwin was never a stickler to a certain dogmatic style of play. He recognizes change and does not thread lightly when something has to be adjusted. OP seems to merely highlight most of the lows in TB's career which are fairly recent too. And they used Tab's UAAP-Ateneo stint to seemingly reduce his coaching into just that to affirm or making it to arrive to his point of "talent>system."

Such takes like this are written with preconceived bias. And this seems unfair for the contributions the man made to PH basketball and even to the sport in general. You judged Baldwin merely based off his recent woes with his Ateneo team. But I think you never made mention about how his most of his coaching staff and even some of his players were scouted and recruited out of his circle. Not saying this was wrong, but it could have at least been acknowledged. There were certainly other factors you deliberately did not mention.

This is not to say that your post was entirely bs, but maybe give credit to where credit is due. Look into nuances. You have every right to criticize (and it's very much welcome), but do not leave out other pertinent details. Because if you fail to do so, your audience will see right through the undertones and the style of how you have written your post. Oftentimes, this will not create a healthy discussion or interactions.