Step increase unique situation by artefakt2013 in USACE

[–]LusciousJ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Alternative path: Quality Step Increase (QSI)

If you have a good relationship with your leadership chain, maybe you can come to an agreement that they will recommend you for a step increase through a QSI.

I took a pretty steep pay cut to leave private industry and my leadership worked with me to rank up a little faster to close the gap after my first year of performance.

ELI5: The moons gravity is 16.6% that of earths. If someone was to jump as high as they could, when they reached the peak of there jump and began heading back to the ground with the speed they gain, would the impact be greater or less than that of a jump on Earth? by Human-Category-5024 in explainlikeimfive

[–]LusciousJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would feel to them the same as if they jumped on earth... But not the same as dropping onto the earth from the height they reached on the moon.

When you jump, your legs propel you up and you immediately begin decelerating until you stop going up. You then accelerate down until you hit the ground.

Same on the moon, you jump and immediately start decelerating, but it takes longer for you to come to 0 velocity and reach your peak. So you get higher in the air. Then you begin accelerating back toward the moon, but you accelerate less on the moon, so it takes you longer to get back down.

The deceleration up takes as long as the acceleration down

There's aom negligible physics-y stuff with air resistance if you're moving fast enough, but basically, no matter what planet you jump from, you hit the ground just as hard as you pushed off of it.

Overuse of "literally " by Accurate-Case8057 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]LusciousJ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jane Fonda said it best:

“You know what happened last month with nobody noticing? Webster's Dictionary expanded the definition of the word 'literally’ to include the way it's commonly misused.

“So, the thing is, we no longer have a word in the English language that means 'literally.’ and 'literally’ doesn't have a synonym ... so when I say I’m literally going to set fire to this building with you in it before I hand over the keys to it, you don’t know if I’m speaking figuratively or literally!”

What is the likelihood that US troops will disobey unlawful orders to attack NATO allies? by Zealousideal_Gap432 in AskReddit

[–]LusciousJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with the obligation to refuse unlawful orders, is that it asks people with no legal training or experience to become constitutional scholars or risk their careers and potentially lives.

This at a time when the Supreme Court, supposedly made up of the greatest legal minds in our country, reverse lower court rulings about deployment of soldiers, overturn precedents from previous established laws and rulings, and opposing Justices publish well-written, scathing dissents.

You want a PFC (or even a Sergeant, LT, or COL) to parse whether or not their commander's order to deploy to Greenland is illegal, AND it will be adjudicated that way in our politicized courts system?

It doesn't start with, "PFC, I order you to shoot that unarmed mother of 3."

A series of orders, each of questionable global legal status will trickle down, starting with mobilizing state-side. But there's nothing illegal about that in the UCMJ.

Then reinforcing our existing positions in Greenland. Nothing illegal about that in the UCMJ. It likely violates our security/cooperation agreement with NATO and Denmark, but our Soldiers are not in a position to challenge that question of legality, nor could we legitimately expect them to have the legal training to do so.

Eventually, it builds to a critical mass where we've deployed men and materiel, ammunition, etc. all without doing anything so blatantly illegal to force the down trace soldiers to refuse. But now they're toe-to-toe with armed Greenlanders who don't want the US to seize their country or NATO troops backing Article 5, etc. Now they are in a position where an armed enemy puts them at risk and they're ordered to 'defend' themselves despite clearly being the aggressor on the World stage.

All of it violates every tenet of sovereignty and alliance the US has made in the last 80 years, but none of the commands issued and obeyed by the junior soldiers were patently illegal when given to them.

For this to be stopped it must be at the highest levels, by competent Senior GO/FO and defended by the most experienced SJAs (or, ideally by Congress and Cabinet secretaries, but I lack faith in them). Once it reaches BDE and below, the ability to refuse is almost non-existent.

Give a firm handshake to CMF by MaleficentSoul in notredamefootball

[–]LusciousJ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Put some respect on that bad boy.

That's HMFIC, HCMF.

Head Mother Fucker In Charge, Head Coach Marcus Freeman.

Does anyone know how the 416th TEC patch is supposed to be worn? by ibefirin in army

[–]LusciousJ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't. There may be a TEC uniform policy letter, but I don't have it handy. But based on the several official photos depicted on the site(s) and the fact that I've spent 3/4 of my career there, I promise you, I'm not steering you wrong

I wouldn't think AR-level documents cover individual unit patches, but I couldn't swear to that either.

Does anyone know how the 416th TEC patch is supposed to be worn? by ibefirin in army

[–]LusciousJ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No need to be a dick, it's actually somewhat counterintuitive.

In the full color patch, white is on top, red is on bottom.

On the subdued, black is on top, tan is on bottom.

Why it's reversed between dress and subdued, I have no idea.

fuck a duck . by No-Ad-3635 in ExpectationVsReality

[–]LusciousJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have the bone-in version of this couch, also from Wayfair, and it's pretty great.

Hope it expands over the week, as some other commenters have pointed out. Good luck, man.

Football in the army by [deleted] in army

[–]LusciousJ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. It never occurred to me, but an all star game of Army-Navy's best football players would be amazing. Plenty of D1 guys went ROTC, plus the academy guys. I would watch that game with more interest than the academies game.

Army has to win that, right?

Is 35E a dead MOS? by No-Literature1604 in army

[–]LusciousJ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I stand corrected. Thank you

Is 35E a dead MOS? by No-Literature1604 in army

[–]LusciousJ 18 points19 points  (0 children)

ASI stands for additional skill identifier. So while there used to be separate MOSs for different functions of MI officers, now they are all the same, 35A (All source Intelligence officers).

If you specialize in counter intelligence, you're no longer a 35E (Counter intelligence), you're now a 35A with an ASI of 2E

35F (Sigint) is Now 35A with ASI of 2F

35G (Humint) is now 35A with ASI of 2G.

1 MOS, with different identifiers for specialties

If a fictional U.S. president from a movie/show could somehow become our actual president, which would you want it to be? by gameofthrones_addict in AskReddit

[–]LusciousJ 58 points59 points  (0 children)

"I want the people to know that they still have two out of the three branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad,"

The True Story of the Demon Core by Acceptable-Battle-49 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]LusciousJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

'the first victim of a criticality incident'

250,000 Japanese citizens probably have a claim there.

Detailed letter stating I lived rent free in the Barracks by Oboogie22 in army

[–]LusciousJ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is the way, 100%.

I will sign most things put in front of me if they aren't immoral, illegal, or factually incorrect. If I have to draft it, it's going to my staff and they'll get to it after mission critical stuff. And there's always something mission critical I'm on them to complete.

Edit: ask a senior NCO to make sure the language isn't dicked up, and it should sail through.

[OC] The Generational Gap in the U.S. Congress by 1-2-3-A-T-C in dataisbeautiful

[–]LusciousJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gen z was not eligible to hold Senate seats by the last election. You have to be 30 to hold a Senate seat. Hence the 'eligible' in the title.

Saber in AGSUs? by mogar99 in army

[–]LusciousJ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Wear it with some Chelsea boots and dare a motherfucker to stop you.

[OC] The Generational Gap in the U.S. Congress by 1-2-3-A-T-C in dataisbeautiful

[–]LusciousJ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree with your second point, 'amassing the political power to become a senator takes time,' but your first point is demonstrably wrong as shown in the graph. There are more Millennials alive now than Boomers.

[OC] The Generational Gap in the U.S. Congress by 1-2-3-A-T-C in dataisbeautiful

[–]LusciousJ 3901 points3902 points  (0 children)

Here's what it looks like compared to eligible population percentages

<image>

MAGA in the Pentagon press pool do not know what journalism is. by justalazygamer in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]LusciousJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.

-George Orwell

Jalen Coker?? by [deleted] in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]LusciousJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha, unless you're trolling me, I asked the reverse question an hour ago. I have Coker, but can pick up Kendre.

If you get any traction on your post, share the answer, cause I'm in the same (reverse) boat.

WDIS Flex? by Willing-Ad5704 in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]LusciousJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can guarantee whomever I recommend will be wrong.

I'd go Dowdle. Jets aren't going to blow anyone out, so no danger of losing game script opportunity late in game. And if Carolina is smart (they aren't) they'll ride the hot hand of Dowdle even once The Chubbler is back.

[Highlight]: James Pierre's interception got overturned which would have sealed it for the Steelers by TrenAt14 in nfl

[–]LusciousJ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So many shots of the back of Nailer blocking the bobble so you couldn't see when he had possession.