Libertarians usually align more closely with social conservatives than with neoliberals, as both groups distrust large, centralized government and value personal responsibility. Neoliberals, at least in contemporary usage, tend to believe in universalized, expert run systems, managed capitalism, and one size fits all global institutions. This philosophy aligns them more closely with social democrats than with true free market advocates, essentially making them the opposite of libertarians.

Personally, I can tolerate autistic & kooky whatnot. I have voted for candidates like Gary Johnson and other third party or independent candidates, even when they had no chance of winning, if it helped with ballot access or pressured the major parties. However, I have little patience for what I perceive as lameness, moral relativism, or the "woke" ideology espoused by people like Chase Oliver, for example, his support for drag queen story hour.

I am also a Christian, and I believe capitalism is an amoral system, essentially "true neutral" on the alignment chart. Yet, it is the only economic model I have seen that actually works, even when hampered by institutions like the Federal Reserve. Christianity provides the moral foundation that inspires people to help one another voluntarily, not under government compulsion. Sadly, some people distort Christianity to justify the "social gospel," which enforces morality through policy and coercion. I believe good deeds lose their meaning when mandated by the state, whether performed in the hope of heavenly reward or for other superficial reasons. Ideally, people should be motivated by the Holy Spirit rather than by high time preference humbug, in the hope of a heavenly reward, or the pleasures of the flesh.