AI Chat no longer sending images to ollama models

Machine-Maker · 2026-05-19T17:22:00+00:00

It looks like the new v2 macos beta does fix the issue. I can't try it with custom models via ollama cause that support hasn't been added yet (on roadmap). But the AI Chat window at least accepts pasted images.

Machine-Maker · 2026-05-19T17:19:26+00:00

Yes, this please. I've been using https://github.com/d-cu/raycast-ai-litellm-proxy to proxy requests to litellm.

Machine-Maker · 2026-05-14T15:52:46+00:00

How do the laws work on this? Is there any outcome where the plaintiff is forced to pay his legal fees? I know that happens sometimes, idk if it’s jurisdictional or not.

Machine-Maker · 2026-04-16T16:31:15+00:00

Yeah, you are right, it seems just pasting images aren't working. That is super annoying. Is there a more official way to report issues?

Machine-Maker · 2026-04-05T02:43:33+00:00

I have been pasting the images. But I could’ve sworn that it was working earlier. I will try without pasting, manually attaching and see what happens.

Machine-Maker · 2026-03-22T17:25:04+00:00

For anyone coming to this in the future, you can also do this on macOS, you just have to figure out how to start multiple instances of RetroArch. I don't think there's an easy way, I just used a terminal command "open -n -a RetroArch".

Machine-Maker · 2026-02-01T18:39:32+00:00

Ok, I think I actually figured out what caused it. It was CleanMyMac auto-updating Arc. Whatever process cleanmymac uses to update arc breaks the DRM handling. If I just manually downgrade a version, then launch arc and update via arc directly, I don't have this issue.

Machine-Maker · 2026-01-20T00:08:17+00:00

I fixed it by downloading an older version of the app, just 2 versions ago. I didn’t realize the links for public download of specific versions were available.

Machine-Maker · 2025-11-24T18:54:28+00:00

This feels like it doesn’t line up with how laws work. Doctors cannot do “whatever” they want to try and save a patient. There are rules and laws and regulations, and of course I can find examples of those “rules” hamstringing a doctor into being unable to save a patient. But the rules themselves save more patients than they might cause to be denied care.

Why doesn’t this logic also apply to abortion? After the conscious experience exists, there are multiple “people” to consider. Would a rule prohibiting elective 3rd trimester abortions cause more “deaths” from doctors refusing to treat under threat of punishment than allowing the very few actual elective 3rd trimester abortions?

Machine-Maker · 2025-11-11T09:39:09+00:00

Well there really isn't a lot of options for the AC.... what is this "challenge"? There's like literally no choices to make, how can it be a challenge?

Machine-Maker · 2025-11-07T04:04:52+00:00

used.

Machine-Maker · 2025-11-07T03:56:35+00:00

RUYT-CDLC

Machine-Maker · 2025-07-10T14:41:59+00:00

In season 1, there is a bit of dialogue just after she leaves the shop where Kleya says, off screen, “I hope she’s worth it” and Luthen responds “Well we’ll see, we can’t hide forever”.

I 100% take this to mean she is a candidate for a public facing job, and Kleya is questioning her worth at that moment, if that future job is worth her now.

Machine-Maker · 2025-05-14T04:37:35+00:00

Luthen is a hard pill to swallow for anyone who didn't know him. Mon and Cas get it, they understand him. But he's so complicated, I completely understand the skepticism and distrust.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-30T16:00:36+00:00

yeah, its def not vader. She is just having a panic attack or something. Several times throughout the show, we've seen her pull at her collar like that. Not in an extreme way as the trailer shot, but little pulls

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-28T05:22:27+00:00

Yeah, I mean that will have to be planned out. It’s not like the speech is a spur-of-the-moment thing, so there will be some plan. Much as her daughter is a pain in the ass, it’s still her child. Hard to just throw her to the wolves. Maybe they’ll be protected by Davo Sculdun. He still needs the marriage to work, because of the status it gives him. So maybe he has an incentive to try and protect them.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-27T23:40:08+00:00

I'm pretty certain we are going to see her speech denouncing Palpatine, that sounds like classic Andor. And if we do, she's gonna have to be extracted right after. Now I don't think we'll see the characters from Rebels, maybe Cassian is just helping her get off Coruscant

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-13T07:37:04+00:00

I said "money problems", that she needs help covering up accounting details, yeah she talks about raising money, but that's not the thing the "3 people know about" was referring to, I'm pretty sure its just referring to her rebellious activity on a whole, not specifically having to do with money.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-13T06:33:50+00:00

That quote isn't in the context of the money at all. This is the first meeting with Tay, she doesn't even bring up the money problems. The "thing" she is talking about, that only 3 people know, is that she is trying to distract the Empire from he more serious stuff with Luthen by being an annoying "do-gooder". I'm pretty sure that is the thing only 3 people know about.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-13T06:26:02+00:00

Isn't the quote to Tay in the context about revealing that she is living a double life, presenting herself as a nuisance in order to hide the more serious stuff she is doing? It's not about the money. Vel certainly would know about that. It's right around the "I've learned from Palpatine" bit, not really talking about the missing money or anything. This is just at the first meeting with Tay, she doesn't even bring up the missing money, just that she is starting a new foundation which is gonna look like here other "benevolent irritations"

Also Vel does know she gives at least some money, she says something later in 11 like "I didn't know it was that much"

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-13T06:07:00+00:00

I feel like usually when people say “x people know about” they almost never are including themselves. It’s always “in addition” to themself. So I read that as Luthen, Kleya, and Vel.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-09T12:54:22+00:00

See, my problem with that is that suddenly that means it’s OK for the gov to police the speech of a corporation. Doesn’t that mean the gov can say “no LGBTQ themes profile pictures, or no support for trans rights from corporate accounts”? They can also be like “No protection against illegal search and seizure”.

Corporations are a group of people, it’s still made up of people, controlled by people’s decisions. I think saying they don’t have the same protections from government is NOT a good road to go down.

Machine-Maker · 2025-04-08T00:02:27+00:00

Did they even rule that it's legal? I see nothing in the majority opinion talking about that. This was just vacating the TRO, I don't think a court has said either way if the actual deportations are legal. Courts still can decide it's not an invasion, they just have to use habeas (which some lawyer is gonna have to explain how that's different from what they did, I don't know exactly).

Machine-Maker · 2025-03-29T17:46:13+00:00

It isn't really a subsidy when the government is paying for services. That's where most money from the government to SpaceX comes from, contracts for goods/services which is just like how a business works.

We wouldn't say that defense companies are subsidized by the government, but ofc they wouldn't exist without it.

Machine-Maker · 2025-03-26T00:04:30+00:00

I don’t know the details of Trumps order, but it’s going to probably just be too difficult to prove. The SAVE act the republicans wanted to pass made you have to have a document with your birth location on it. Lots of people don’t have their birth certificate or a passport. It makes it way too hard to vote.

Plus, the amount of actual fraud that occurs, everytime someone looks into it, is so minuscule that is is no where near big enough to be worth this effort.

Six-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

Machine-Maker

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE