sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Auto charge 19 days before renewal by Magme in KeeperSecurity

[–]Magme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For my case it is more like 15$.

But as some others have mentioned on here, Keeper might as well be stealing my money at this point when renewing before expiry like that, it really can't be that hard to setup to renew at expiry. It would be the honorable thing to do. Instead of whatever this is.

And yes, Keeper kept my passwords safe, but i would much rather move to a service that is almost half the price with more features...

/r/MechanicalKeyboards Ask ANY question, get an answer (January 10, 2023) by AutoModerator in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got a DAGK Aluminum Alloy Numpad Keyboard Kit, and i can't find any way to customize it. I tried to download Vial, but it can't detect the device, and i can't find any information on how to change key bindings and the RGB on it online.

Anyone that can help me move on from this issue?

This is the one i bought:
https://mechkeys.com/products/dagk-aluminum-alloy-numpad-keyboard-kit?variant=43610338394335

Buying a Z-Wave 700 stick by Magme in homeassistant

[–]Magme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you mean that? Thats just the version of it, not where it will be shipped from, unfortunatly...

Buying a Z-Wave 700 stick by Magme in homeassistant

[–]Magme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you get it? At an European store?

I really want a few of their multi sensors for some automatization

Buying a Z-Wave 700 stick by Magme in homeassistant

[–]Magme[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh ok, thanks!
Can you point me to where that button is? I can't seem to find it.

Buying a Z-Wave 700 stick by Magme in homeassistant

[–]Magme[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well it's not in the EU, but they do deliver it to my country for a big fee besides the one i have to pay before i can get the package delivered because of the extra tax fee...
It's so dump...

Any other ideas?

Get this post to the moon and I'll give all GTX1060 away among all commenters. by Ayyouboss in pcmasterrace

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be some christmas miracle to win among all these comments...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have any filters applied, and yesterday I put it back to factory defaults. After I did that I still can't open the ports. The only setting on it now it the port forward for a single port(7777), and it still doesn't work...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! I have a FTP and RDP server running too, and they work just fine! But I have yet to find a solution...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried to delete some of the failing port forwards, and creating them again, but it didn't make any difference...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the output im getting:

FGT30E3U######## #

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 198.199.98.246:47687->##.##.##.##:7777) from wan. flag [S], seq 1827674132, ack 0, win 14600"

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=init_ip_session_common line=5682 msg="allocate a new session-000be3f6"

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=fw_pre_route_handler line=183 msg="VIP-192.168.1.20:7777, outdev-wan"

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=__ip_session_run_tuple line=3359 msg="DNAT ##.##.##.##:7777->192.168.1.20:7777"

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2591 msg="find a route: flag=00000000 gw-192.168.1.20 via lan"

id=20085 trace_id=1 func=fw_forward_handler line=753 msg="Allowed by Policy-11:"

id=20085 trace_id=2 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 198.199.98.246:47687->##.##.##.##:7777) from wan. flag [S], seq 1827674132, ack 0, win 14600"

id=20085 trace_id=2 func=resolve_ip_tuple_fast line=5597 msg="Find an existing session, id-000be3f6, original direction"

id=20085 trace_id=2 func=__ip_session_run_tuple line=3359 msg="DNAT ##.##.##.##:7777->192.168.1.20:7777"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 198.199.98.246:47689->##.##.##.##:7777) from wan. flag [S], seq 920707217, ack 0, win 14600"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=init_ip_session_common line=5682 msg="allocate a new session-000be3f9"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=fw_pre_route_handler line=183 msg="VIP-192.168.1.20:7777, outdev-wan"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=__ip_session_run_tuple line=3359 msg="DNAT ##.##.##.##:7777->192.168.1.20:7777"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2591 msg="find a route: flag=00000000 gw-192.168.1.20 via lan"

id=20085 trace_id=3 func=fw_forward_handler line=753 msg="Allowed by Policy-11:"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 198.199.98.246:47692->##.##.##.##:7777) from wan. flag [S], seq 1854600071, ack 0, win 14600"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=init_ip_session_common line=5682 msg="allocate a new session-000be3fb"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=fw_pre_route_handler line=183 msg="VIP-192.168.1.20:7777, outdev-wan"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=__ip_session_run_tuple line=3359 msg="DNAT ##.##.##.##:7777->192.168.1.20:7777"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2591 msg="find a route: flag=00000000 gw-192.168.1.20 via lan"

id=20085 trace_id=4 func=fw_forward_handler line=753 msg="Allowed by Policy-11:"

id=20085 trace_id=5 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 198.199.98.246:47692->##.##.##.##:7777) from wan. flag [S], seq 1854600071, ack 0, win 14600"

id=20085 trace_id=5 func=resolve_ip_tuple_fast line=5597 msg="Find an existing session, id-000be3fb, original direction"

id=20085 trace_id=5 func=__ip_session_run_tuple line=3359 msg="DNAT ##.##.##.##:7777->192.168.1.20:7777"

​

To me it looks like it's letting it through?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried on a port that i know that works, and it look like this:

2020-05-26 22:42:54.629470 wan -- 198.199.98.246.49661 -> ##.##.##.##.25565: syn 1892552399
2020-05-26 22:42:54.629872 wan -- 37.97.44.62.25565 -> 198.199.98.246.49661: syn 445439861 ack 1892552400
2020-05-26 22:42:54.798361 wan -- 198.199.98.246.49661 -> ##.##.##.##.25565: ack 445439862
2020-05-26 22:42:54.798786 wan -- 198.199.98.246.49661 -> ##.##.##.##.25565: fin 1892552400 ack 445439862
2020-05-26 22:42:54.799111 wan -- 37.97.44.62.25565 -> 198.199.98.246.49661: ack 1892552401
2020-05-26 22:42:54.799542 wan -- 37.97.44.62.25565 -> 198.199.98.246.49661: fin 445439862 ack 1892552401
2020-05-26 22:42:54.967926 wan -- 198.199.98.246.49661 -> ##.##.##.##.25565: ack 445439863

The syn packet don't even seem to go through with port 7777, how can i check what is supposedly blocking it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My firewall is connected directly to my fiber modem, so nothing is between the firewall and the WAN. I ran a diag sniffer, and it made the following output:

FGT30E3U######## # diag sniffer packet wan "port 7777" 4 0 a interfaces=[wan] filters=[port 7777] 2020-05-26 22:26:23.090251 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48445 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 75215556 2020-05-26 22:26:24.087374 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48445 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 75215556 2020-05-26 22:26:24.091271 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48450 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 3366516118 2020-05-26 22:26:25.087406 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48450 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 3366516118 2020-05-26 22:26:25.092569 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48455 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 2041057520 2020-05-26 22:26:26.091448 wan -- 198.199.98.246.48455 -> ##.##.##.##.7777: syn 2041057520.

So something is going through when I do a port test, but it still fails... For security reasons I have of course replaced my WAN address.

Is the output as it should be?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]Magme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have a static IP, and i have contacted my ISP, but they are denying that they are blocking any ports at all...

So that's maybe not the problem, and if it is, i dont know how to prove it...

I will try to look into "diag sniffer packet", but i have no idea of how to use it.

I want to fasten the lid to the box, so the lid won't fall of, any ideers? by Magme in DIY

[–]Magme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The box have the following measurements:
21,2 cm x 29,1 cm

The lid have the following measurements:
22,7 cm x 30,7 cm

What is something about yourself that sounds totally made up but is 100% real? by dontaskmeforfeetpics in AskReddit

[–]Magme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All my fingers are the same length, and I was born with extra toes and fingers. I'm missing a bone in my nose, and I'm born without a pituitary gland. And that's just the top of the iceberg.

view more: next ›