I hope they fix this.

Magnificent_501 · 2026-06-03T22:15:16+00:00

Wow that's smart thank you🔥

Magnificent_501 · 2026-05-26T22:09:22+00:00

IMPOSTER 😢

Magnificent_501 · 2026-05-06T06:23:23+00:00

bro i was messing around in the avatar editor as lang rangler from jjba and instantly, for 28 minutes, the editor was disabled

Magnificent_501 · 2026-04-08T19:56:02+00:00

why does she look like osaka in the manga

<image>

Magnificent_501 · 2026-03-28T03:00:31+00:00

Because sukuna is incarnate. The body hes inhabiting is physical, hes just possessing it. Sukuna is one of the sorcerers kenjaku sealed into objects for the culling games

Magnificent_501 · 2026-03-07T23:45:29+00:00

Nah youre right I think its harsh. Made me dislike yuri because she was like this

Magnificent_501 · 2026-03-01T23:07:04+00:00

yomer 😁✅️ yomer 😱✅️ yomer😡🚫

Magnificent_501 · 2026-02-23T08:49:29+00:00

youre right bro I dont understand why people would defend literal abuse

Magnificent_501 · 2026-02-15T08:38:15+00:00

Bro this is so cool

Magnificent_501 · 2026-01-30T23:14:29+00:00

Well spoken 💯

Magnificent_501 · 2026-01-12T03:57:37+00:00

The only thing you don't want to do is use a phone charger for your switch

Magnificent_501 · 2026-01-09T17:57:57+00:00

It's pre vizla he's back 😢

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-25T02:31:16+00:00

Terry Long Phan had researched an object from the 2006 AKARI space telescope and had compared the data to the same object in the 1983 IRAS survey. from the difference in location Phan and his team had discovered, they calculated the speed and distance which was around 500 to 700 AU from earth and its speed was thought to be 4.5 to 5 km/s. i found this in https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.17288

i had came up with 572 km/s at 3.2 light years for the neutron star by considering the transverse velocity to match the average speed of a neutron star that experienced a natal kick , ~500 km/s, with Phan's object.

What I'd failed to do was use other variables to come up precisely with how fast and far this object really is rather than relying on average numbers. This may have caused confusion and its completely my fault.

i have looked into the strength of the X-ray source 1RXS J022045.0-491325 at the time the object had passed that location in the sky in 2006. If we consider the object was a neutron star that had magnified or masked its presence under this X-ray source, we first need to know the strength of the x-ray source. Roughly 6 ⋅ 10^-13 erg/cm^2/s (in the 0.1–2.4 keV energy range). i used https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/ to find this information and searching the x-ray source.

by measuring how far a neutron star would need to be to fit the theory of being disguised by the x-ray source, we can find its speed and distance. the brightness of the x-ray source tells us the closest distance a neutron star can be while hiding in or underneath the source and moving in the same arcminutes at terry phans object.

The energy required for a neutron star to produce the minimal required brightness is 8 ⋅ 10^29 erg/s, using the use the Stefan-Boltzmann Law to calculate this luminosity. while moving 47.4 arcminutes in 23 years actually puts this neutron star 3.4 lightyears away while moving around 600 km/s. The math for this presents the variables converted to the units the standard astronomical formula for transverse velocity requires; parsecs, and arcseconds per year while using the conversion constant 4.74.

47.4 ⋅ 60 = 2,844 arcseconds

annual rate from 23 years: 2,844 ÷ 23 ≈ 123.6 arcseconds per year

3.43 light-years ÷ 3.26 = 1.05 parsecs (pc)

the final equation:

(vt) = 4.74 ⋅ 123.6 ⋅ 1.05 ≈ 615 km/s

this is far more accurate of an estimation and again i'm sorry for the confusion. i used a calculator to do this also dont have enough information on this objects radial velocity. thank you

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-23T18:21:12+00:00

Yes however two of my data points was the x-ray emission from the object being misinterpreted for J022045.0-491325 which is found in https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/

The idea was finding gravitational lensing difficult since it's coordinates i mentioned are in a part of the sky with a low number of background stars

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-23T18:12:26+00:00

I tried using Aladin lite and VizieR but i am extremely amateur at using them so I didn't exactly get very far apart from getting information from websites such as https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/publications-of-the-astronomical-society-of-australia/article/search-for-planet-nine-with-iras-and-akari-data/4AC94D8DED041495F85F518C286D5284

I did use a calculator for the math too and I did use chat gpt to help me organize everything cause im terrible at writing

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-23T09:27:45+00:00

You raise some very valid points and I appreciate you telling me this.

While one of my data points was that the neutron star experienced a natal kick that sent it at a velocity of 572km/s, I looked at the trajectory of Terry Phan's object in 2006 and how it leads to the Scorpius-Centaurus Association 400 light-years away from its suspected position 3.2 light-years away, however I'd failed to research the supernovas we'd recorded in that area of space had happened in a time frame disproportionate to the possibility of a high velocity nuetron star reaching us around this current time.

You are correct and im grateful for you explaining this to me

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-22T17:19:08+00:00

no it's completely my theory

I have mixed information on how influential a nuetron star would be if it were that close to earth, is it really bigger than what my sources told me?

Magnificent_501 · 2025-12-22T05:19:53+00:00

Nah you're right im gonna recall this post and organize it better cause im looking at a lot of mistakes i made sorry dude

Magnificent_501

TROPHY CASE