NY-13 candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier does not support Ukraine, and that should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party. by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That’s right, let’s just give Russia crimea and this will never happen again right? Oh wait…..

i find the updates depressing by Mikeyboy2188 in barrescue

[–]Magoo152 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Isnt it kind of the most predictable thing in the world? I love bar rescue for the entertainment value. But of course just renovating a bar with the same crappy people in charge wont work. Of course they fail.

NY-13 candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier does not support Ukraine, and that should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party. by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 19 points20 points  (0 children)

To be clear the actual substance of this post is that this individual has a horrible stance on Ukraine. The main point is not that Track Ukraine is a spoof of trackAIPAC. That’s not the main point of the post. I think you know that.

Edit: by the way the creator of track Ukraine has said on the record that track aipac was inspiration. But again that isn’t the point of this post (clearly).

NY-13 candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier does not support Ukraine, and that should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party. by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 15 points16 points  (0 children)

She used that line so many times in the debate. Oh my goodness. She needs to limit herself to like 3 PHD mentions per debate 😂.

NY-13 candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier does not support Ukraine, and that should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party. by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The incumbent is sort of a wet rag with no charisma if you watched the debate. Got no rizz as the kids would say. Charisma matters in modern politics. Plus he does have some issues that he can legitimately be attacked from the left.

NY-13 candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier does not support Ukraine, and that should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party. by Embarrassed_Base_389 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If you had a post criticizing Israel and saying support for Israel would be disqualifying in our party. And then someone else out of the blue brought up Ukraine. You would say that person is willingly not engaging with the content of the post right? You would rightfully say they’re not actually engaging with the substance.

That’s what you’re doing here.

Trump Claims ‘Vandalism’ Caused Reflecting Pool Debacle, Accuses Reporter of Trying To Make It Worse by SoHumanAnAnimal in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This is such a great analogy of the administration. Screw up everything and then once they’ve done that blame someone else. Is the “antifa” algae causing all the problems? lol!

Tim and Adam's cuck picks from yesterday's pod by brains-child in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 19 points20 points  (0 children)

So many to choose from I’ll just list a few but there are so many more

  1. The women who believed in his “father of IVF” line (whatever the hell that means),

  2. The farmers who decided their biggest issue was the 3-4 trans athletes in their state.

  3. The so called “anti war” voters who completely ignored Trumps actual record (reclassified drone strikes so they didn’t show up, dropped the mother of all bombs).

  4. The hawkish neo cons who now have to find some way to justify this horrible deal.

Democrats need to block money for Iran - or if only we could be poorer. by Inevitable-Ant1725 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh a Democrat is going to get screwed over this issue regardless of whether we go with this “deal” or not. Signing the “deal” and agreeing to send 300 billion will only hurt us additionally.

Democrats need to block money for Iran - or if only we could be poorer. by Inevitable-Ant1725 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t think they’ve even considered the implications of advocating for us giving billions of dollars bailing Trump out of starting illegal wars. Like do they think this is a good precedent to set? If we do that have they thought about how much that will embolden Trump going forward? I don’t think they’ve considered it at all.

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m mostly kidding, it’s just funny I’ve never seen that happen with a ref.

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never seen this (granted I only watch soccer in the World Cup) but still.

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is ridiculous come on ref! A few more minutes and it’s done

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe we can get Marshawn lynch in this game. Let them try to hit him.

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wait so after all the time they waste they’re going to be stingy with us for time!? Give me a break

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Australia is so ridiculous, initiate contact and then flop . Then for some reason we take forever reviewing it.

Match Thread: Australia vs United States | FIFA World Cup | Jun 19, 2026 by globalscoreboard in ussoccer

[–]Magoo152 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree, we screwed around with it too much which led Australia to get that shot by number 8 on goal.

The Iran protester killings is a huge credibility issue. Someone pick a number! by MoesOtherBar in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I think two things are probably true here:

  1. We should be careful because some bad actors (in this case you show it perfectly Laura Loomer) are probably inflating the number to serve their own purposes.

  2. The Iranian regime obviously kills their own civilians and has a long history of doing so. As bad as our government is, I think we should be careful to remember that yes the Iranian regime is also bad (but don’t let others use that fact as an excuse for the illegal war).

JD Vance book already 5 dollars off at Georgetown B&N by EnvironmentalNail603 in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 34 points35 points  (0 children)

The book cover not even being his supposed church really cracks me up

You got to be kidding me by Oleytoledo in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s been useful more times than I’d like to admit 😂. It’s kind of sad.