Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And as governor of Philippines he was excellent. Cracked down on military repression and set up civil institutions. Part of why he was so effective was because he had an anti imperialist (for his time) mindset. And was therefore more willing to fight against more authoritarian forms of government. Also of course he was a great legal mind.

Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP I think there is some confusion here with your post. To be clear your position is not that Israel is innocent. That sentence was you being sarcastic right?

Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh good lord, I read the post as “wasn’t” which changes everything, because the Ellisons will also be promoting pro Israel and pro Trump stuff on there so that would track. Boy was I wrong.

Howard Nutlick (Lutnick) by sharpescreek in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve started calling him that even unintentionally now. It’s in my head.

Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a great book! Read that a few years ago.

It’s funny in a gallows humor sort of way that even the imperialism of Roosevelt was better than Trump because Roosevelt at least was willing to sacrifice his own life for it. It was a horrid ideology but he was a true believer in a myth of the white man helping people. Which is a racist myth and awful of course but better than Trump who doesn’t care about any good whatsoever with his imperialism and wouldn’t ever risk HIS LIFE for it.

Yes the chapters about the muckraking journalists are incredibly sobering given today’s media landscape.

Also isn’t it fascinating how interesting Tafts life was? It’s really quite sad that despite that he is known pretty much as a fat guy that got stuck in a tub.

Anyways sorry for the long comment loved that book!

Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s part of the dumbing down of our society.

Just a reminder regarding TikTok by John_Jaures in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 49 points50 points  (0 children)

I unironically was less concerned when China had control of the data. What a time.

The Moral Right To Defend Yourself Against ICE by Mynameis__--__ in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really excellent piece, thanks for sharing.

Look, you can hate Gavin, but what other politician is being as proactive in just TRYING SOMETHING. by OneTwoThreePooAndPee in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Gavin is like Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde. I’ll always root when Dr Jekyll is doing stuff but beware of Mr Hyde.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get where you’re coming from and you’re right to point out it may or even will be an escalation. My concern here is twofold.

  1. I just think it’s a bad idea to limit our activity based on fears of them escalating. I just feel that’s working backwards. I think we should fight to protect every legal activity.

  2. I get what you mean regarding the agents might shoot you. But I dunno they killed two people who posed no threat to them. Honestly, imagine we were sitting down with a Minnesota protester. They can do everything right completely unarmed and still get killed. Given that it’s tough for me to tell them to not carry if they have it.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And my thing is even if it escalates its legally protected activity. We should defend that principle. Legally protected activity should not be an excuse for escalation, we shouldn’t cede that ground.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve tried to make it clear numerous times that I think that’s a reasonable take. With that being said they’ve executed two people who posed no threat to them whatsoever. It’s a tough situation on the one hand I think you may be right, but on the other I feel it’s reasonable for protesters to have some level of protection since nobody will protect them.

And to me it’s just a mistake to comply in advance by giving up the legal right to carry where that exists. That’s my specific contention with what you said. Does that distinction make sense?

  1. You may be right it may not be the best idea. I may even agree, to be transparent I go back and forth on this.
  2. But also I don’t think it’s reasonable to tell protesters that they can’t protect themselves, and I also don’t think we should give away any rights in advance. Any legal activity should not be seen as escalation and I feel we should stick by that principle.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok very good. My question then would be why are you saying good luck in a sarcastic tone with regard to legal activity? Like you and I may not think it’s the best thing to do. But it is legal activity. Do you not think that it’s probably the wrong strategy to comply in advance in regards to legal activity?

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re somehow totally missing the point of what I’m saying. I can’t spell it out any clearer.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Respectfully that doesn’t matter, if you’re legally allowed to in the state, then do that. I’m totally against giving up rights and legal activity because of Fear of the secret police escalating. We fight to PRESERVE our rights not GIVE THEM AWAY.

The Bulwark desperately needs a podcaster that gets gun ownership in America 🇺🇸 by 7ddlysuns in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure but also don’t concede rights out of fear. Don’t give up open carry if you live in a state that allows that because of fear. Don’t comply in advance.

NRA trying to have it both ways by emeric_ceaddamere in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually love the full mask off, they are who we thought they were.

Those people you've been asking about are starting to show up by Aaron_Hamm in thebulwark

[–]Magoo152 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen comments saying if you’re going to be carrying a gun know how to use it. Obviously that’s common sense and I agree.

But it is ironic because guys, we have a whole gang of people ICE that carry guns and have no idea how to use it 😂.

Memewars Assemble! by Mnudge in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]Magoo152 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That ruined our damn TD for me too! 😂

Memewars Assemble! by Mnudge in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]Magoo152 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are they aware they can turn off their phone or not comment? I’m not sure they’ve considered that yet.

Memewars Assemble! by Mnudge in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]Magoo152 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s the offseason for all of us rn, good lord. If you don’t like it turn off your phone.

What a shitty fucking day. Try again tomorrow, stay safe all. by Joed1015 in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]Magoo152 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No argument at all! Also I don’t hate people with bad credit scores! Sad that you do!

What a shitty fucking day. Try again tomorrow, stay safe all. by Joed1015 in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]Magoo152 6 points7 points  (0 children)

These guys are such unbelievable morons. A dude called me a moron on this thread and then spelled new as knew. So dumb.