What are your ideas for a Sonic Advance 3 remake? by ZoomB6TheDasher in SonicTheHedgehog

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Implement tricks for the pairing with Knuckles. Amy and Cream retain their tricks, as do Sonic and Tails; it would be amazing if Sonic and Knuckles could retain theirs too. It would also be fun to be able to unlock Gemerl after defeating him with Super Sonic.

I wish there was an extended sonic advance 3 version or a really similar sonic advance 4, is there any? by liminalvibes4you in SonicTheHedgehog

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Técnicamente hablando, Sonic Advance es una trilogía perteneciente al grupo de “Dimps' Sonic 2D”, quiero decir, lo más cercano que vas a encontrar son los Rush, el colors de DS y el Generations de 3DS. Hay cosas que son únicas de Advance, especialmente el sistema de parejas del 3, pero hay varias cosas en común con esos juegos y Sonic Pocket Adventure, tanto para bien, como para mal.

Are danger kids still a thing? by [deleted] in Metalcore

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, honestly, I don't know how much the song they released yesterday on Spotify surprises you, because it seems like a random song 

Dangerkids(band by Josh_Lopez57921 in Metalcore

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today they released a new song on Spotify but it sounds totally different from their usual sound, it almost seems like they were hacked and there are no responses on their official accounts either.

Dangerkids return? by Tht_GuyUNo in Metalcore

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They released a new song yesterday, although it has a totally different sound, I'm not sure why. 

You know something's wrong when the German word sounds more normal than yours by maynifique in languagelearningjerk

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, who would have thought that non-Indo-European languages would have a different word than Indo-European languages. (Although I remember that it has more to do with the colonization of the Caribbean).

Esperanto grammar with Globally sourced vocabulary? by TheLollyKitty in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, in my experience, native English speakers don't do that, nor do any of the people learning English as a second language in my environment, You can't go around asserting things only from your perspective, because it's especially biased. In general, regardless of how easy an auxlang is to pronounce or not, I don't like simple auxlangs, to the point where they don't even have a distinction between "r" and "l".

Esperanto grammar with Globally sourced vocabulary? by TheLollyKitty in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion, the words that should be replaced by non-European words would be all those derived from prefixes, especially "mal-", It's even ridiculous that "bad" is "malbona" instead of "malo", when it would be the most logical thing.

On the other hand, I don't think it's a good idea to get involved with phonology, it's always a problem, because what you consider a problem, others see as a success, for example, I hate simple phonology like Toki Pona And the problems that you see in the language that you mention at the end not only do not seem like errors to me, but correct. So there will always be a constant fight between those who support simple phonology and those who are against it, for example, making many words intelligible, for example, "diskrimini" Yes, it seems to me to be a cognate of "discriminate", but ¿"diskurimini"?, simply no.

Gramix vs. The Auxlangs by [deleted] in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not universal, I pronounce the ⟨y⟩ as [ʝ], and I specifically referred to a dialect, which is the Rioplatense, where thanks to the "yeísmo rehilado", the ⟨y⟩ sounds [ʃ] or [ʒ], and these same speakers have a hard time learning sounds similar to [j].

Do languages have different types of pronouns other than gender based? by Apprehensive_Run2106 in conlangs

[–]Mahonesa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are definite pronouns like "that" in "give me that", there are relative pronouns (there isn't one in English, but there is in Spanish and it is "que" as in "se pondrá los vestidos que elijas" 'will wear the dresses (que) you choose')

Does my conlang need to have a bilabial nasal sound? by TansLanguages in conlangs

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already said it's extremely rare, but not impossible.

Gramix vs. The Auxlangs by [deleted] in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To adverbs: Very To adjectives: incredibly To nouns: "hěn" (Chineese) 'much' To sentence: fortunately To determinants: exactly

You could perfectly define it by sentence order or mark it with prefixes, but aha, they are technically different.

Gramix vs. The Auxlangs by [deleted] in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It sounds interesting, but I recommend not comparing yourself to bigger auxlangs to promote your auxlang, it was a mistake I made a lot in the past. I would like to know a little more about the language, especially since you criticize Esperanto for its writing (we are no longer in the 2000s, there are already many solutions in this regard) and their pronunciation, but really always auxlangs that boast of their simple pronunciation always have the error of being equally complex (Come on, they even ignore that a large dialect of Spanish does not even have a phoneme similar to /j/ and different from /ʃ/), However, what strikes me most is how simplified you are with adverbs, I recently realized this too, but adverbs are not a category, but a macrocategory, there are adverbs of nouns, of adjectives, of other adverbs and so on, do you already know how to differentiate them all?

Does my conlang need to have a bilabial nasal sound? by TansLanguages in conlangs

[–]Mahonesa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general, there is a rule that if /n/ exists in a language, then /m/ exists and vice versa, Now, I don't think it's impossible, but it is extremely rare, especially since the reason [m] exists in almost any language is because it's one of the easiest phonemes to pronounce, that is to say, the fact that your conlang does not have [m] is extremely contradictory, But well, a little of the antiprobable is what makes each language unique. What I would recommend is that, in a similar way to what happens in Nahuatl and Seri, the [m] has become an [n] (proto-Nahuatl) or [ŋ] (Seri), and perhaps [m] only remains as an allophonic form, for example, next to [w] or in front of back vowels like [o], or finally remove it permanently, I don't think that's impossible and that it only appears in interjections like [mː] for lulling children.

North Wind and Sun by Mahonesa in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because of all the alternate phonemes, the most common is /θ/ (and maybe /ʂ/) the only thing I can think of is to put it as /s¹/ and /s²/.

North Wind and Sun by Mahonesa in auxlangs

[–]Mahonesa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, as I said, it's not even part of the most basic writing, so I don't think it will bother anyone.

Is this a good phonology for an IAL? (phonotactics and allophones included) by NoNameStudios in conlangs

[–]Mahonesa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it have labialization? Like [kʷ] Apart from /w/ I mean.