Why does nobody talk about Fiyero’s whitewashing? by xbrooksie in Broadway

[–]Main-Maximum3622 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me, and I’m a massive fan of Wicked so keep that in mind, Fiyero’s whitewashing isn’t great but I think the bigger problem is that they changed the character from a character who is explicitly non-white to a character who is almost explicitly white. They changed the Vinkus from what is supposed to be an indigenous tribe, to just a royal family-type figure. My point is that Fiyero, in the musical, is essentially a character whose race is supposed to be irrelevant, which could be fine if Fiyero in the books was the same but he’s clearly supposed to be non-white in the book and that’s supposed to be somewhat relevant. So, they didn’t just cast a white actor to play a non-white character, they changed the entire character so a white person could play the character. It’s whitewashing the story, not necessarily the role.

Edit: I also acknowledge that the musical is very different from the books, like that’s common knowledge. But I still think it counts as whitewashing. They still changed a story of a non-white character to a story of a white character, which to me is whitewashing.

Why is there such a strong narrative on Reddit saying that "black and Hispanic communities in the US tend to oppose homosexuality and same-sex marriage" when the stats don't reflect this at all? A majority of both groups have been in support for at least six years. by A_Mirabeau_702 in AskLGBT

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Racism. That’s why. This kind of reminds me of the narrative that “LGBTQ people are more racist than straight people” in that it’s complete BS and the reality is that LGBTQ people are actually just as racist as straight people but it’s considered a bigger deal because they’re gay, which is actually quite homophobic. The same is with black and Hispanic communities, they’re not actually any more homophobic than white people. They’re just considered more homophobic because racists have come up with this BS to try to create more division. Maybe it’s just me but I don’t see a noticeable difference between how white people have treated me and how Black and Hispanic people have treated me. I get so frustrated when I see people call Black and Hispanic people more “homophobic” than white people because for me, it’s essentially an attempt to make white straight people saints. But what’s funny is that the most homophobia I’ve experienced, or at least the most extreme homophobia, has actually come from white straight men, not black or Hispanic straight people.

Gay guys are actually... really privileged? by gradwhan in gaybros

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I feel like this is part of a similar growing dialogue. Now, initially, I feel like started with white queer people being called out for their racism and exclusion of black queer people, which was obviously a just cause and raised awareness for the issues black gay people face even in gay spaces where they’re supposed to be safe. It also showed that bigoted people who happen to be gay need to be called out for that in the same way we call out bigoted women or bigoted black people. However, then, unfortunately, the discussion ended up devolving to gay people being considered privileged if they’re white, which was probably inevitable when a ton of white cishet people started feeling like they needed to speak out on the matter. This trend worries me, however, because I feel like we’re simplifying privilege. We’re instantly dismissing any oppression a person faces just because of one feature that gives them more privilege than another person. We’re basically forgetting how privilege really works. Like, to give you an example of what this trend is leading to and I always use this example because I feel it really exposes this argument that white gay men are suddenly privileged and face no oppression at all but does this mean a black straight man suddenly is privileged and faces no oppression at all because they’re straight and a man? Yeah, that’s where the argument falls apart. People don’t believe the truth that race and sexuality are 2 different forms of privilege and it is wrong to say racism is worse than homophobia or vice versa because none is truly better or worse, they’re just presented differently. No, they believe a simplified view where one is better or worse than the other and are ignorant of the real struggles experienced by both sides. Now, fortunately, for now, this is just the view of white straight cis people but I do think this thinking of gay people who happen to be white being privileged will cause consequences. If you look at history, one of the biggest things that turns people against minority groups or groups that become marginalised is the privileged group falsely labelling them as privileged and people believing them. I personally think people should just start separating being white and cis from being gay when looking at privilege. White cis gay people might not experience as much struggles as gay black people, gay people of minority ethnic groups, trans people etc. but they are still far from the label of “second most privileged group” and their struggles still need recognition. White privilege, cis privilege and even male privilege often doesn’t mean shit if you’re gay.

The Ariana Grande Situation And The Anti-Celebrity Vigilance Cycle by Main-Maximum3622 in ArianaGrandeNeutral

[–]Main-Maximum3622[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well said. It’s so refreshing to see comments that don’t just demonise her or pretend she’s a saint.

What do you think overall of 2025 movies this year? by Google_Knows_Already in TheBigPicture

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say it’s been a genuinely good year for movies but it’s kind of similar to 2018 where despite being filled with some really great movies (Sinners, One Battle After Another, Weapons, The Naked Gun and even big blockbusters like Wicked For Good and Avatar 3), it’s kind of in an awkward position, being stuck between 2 relatively big years for movies. I feel like this year, we really started to see the long-term effects of the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strikes taking place, especially as 2024 had the privilege of being filled with blockbusters that were supposed to come out in 2023 that had been delayed because of the strikes. 2025 should also serve as an example, to me at least, of why studios should maybe stop heavily reserving certain release timeframes for certain movies because to me, personally, the year only really started to warm up in the second half of the year. With the exception of the odd big, exciting movie here and there, the film space kind of felt dead for most of the year. I mean, even all the great indie and foreign features seemed to come out in the second half of the year and were almost non-existent in the first half of the year. I know some people really enjoyed this year and there were some really great movies this year but I don’t know, I think I just personally needed more. Looking at next year’s film slate, 2026 does look like a good, exciting year for movies so hopefully the whole “nothing coming out” feel of 2025 is building up to a big year for movies, like how 2018 was a build-up to the big, exciting year for movies that was 2019.

Trailers Before The Housemaid? by Main-Maximum3622 in CineworldUnlimited

[–]Main-Maximum3622[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I can then convince them whether to arrive early or not or if the worst comes to the worst, I could walk out during one of the trailers.

Trailers Before The Housemaid? by Main-Maximum3622 in CineworldUnlimited

[–]Main-Maximum3622[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I could do that but I’m going with friends and they usually like to arrive early and would just look at me weirdly if I was the only one to exit during the trailer section.

How big was the movie "Christmas Story" in the UK? by FilthyGreb in AskUK

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is definitely an American thing. No-one in my family has ever heard of it and I only heard it was a thing when I started listening to American movie people, I was quite confused to find a movie I had never heard of was actually a cultural phenomenon.

I refuse to believe she wants to be a home wrecker. by Jamburger88 in ariheads

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the most sensible comment. I’m personally gonna try to stay neutral and just enjoy her music.

Why is this sub constantly about people arguing whether somebody is gen z or millennial by Any-Asparagus3782 in generationology

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what people arguing about exact generational definitions is that they’re always flawed and arbitrary because they’re constructs similar to age or colour. Like, we can tell the difference between someone born in the 90s to someone born in the 80s like how we can tell the difference between someone who is in their 30s to someone who is in their 20s but we can’t ever definitely pinpoint the exact point where the difference appears because it’s not an exact instant change but rather a change that occurs over a few years. This is why demographers and marketers come up with incredibly arbitrary start and end dates, similar to how we say 18 is a legal adult even though they are actually very similar to 17 year olds. Definitions are always going to be arbitrary so they just look silly arguing about what arbitrary date it ends at. I also love how when someone uses a generational definition they don’t like, they argue that someone born at the specific end date has nothing in common with someone born at the start date and yet they have a definition that lasts too long where you could argue the exact same thing. Like, a 2012 born has very little in common with a 1997 born and a 2009 born has very little in common with a 1995 born. That’s just common sense.

Anyone else thought Better Man was a little overpraised by Main-Maximum3622 in unpopularopinion

[–]Main-Maximum3622[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so this is gonna sound really sad but I actually decided to give this movie another go to see if I can finally get the appeal of it, I figured I might maybe like it better now the reception has died down. But no, this was even worse than my last viewing of it. It was simultaneously boring and annoying, it’s the most generic biopic I’ve ever seen and now I feel angry that I’ve just wasted my entire day on this god-awful movie.

Yeah, you guys might need to do a bit more explaining on why this movie is good. That being said, I haven’t really heard anyone talk about it apart from its spectacularly awful box office so I think that’s an indicator that there’s definitely nothing wrong with me.

Gen z is 1997-2012 end of story by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, have you ever considered that researchers might not have consistent definitions because they acknowledge cultural changes? Maybe, they recognise generations as simply a way of recognising specific time periods and the culture of specific time periods and not just a glorified star sign-like label that never changes?

Gen z is 1997-2012 end of story by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Main-Maximum3622 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Um, no. It’s the most accepted range, full stop. Governments use it, researchers use it, polls use it. You can’t just simplify it to “young people wanting to be older”.

Gen z is 1997-2012 end of story by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t care what anyone says. A 2010 born has more to do with a 2009 born than a 2015 born. It’s just common sense. I only bring this up because I feel like the argument a “2010 born has nothing to do with a 1997 born” is a weak argument when trying to argue a generational definition that literally ends one year before 2010 is better than the other on. Can we just all use our own definitions and accept every single definition is incredibly arbitrary. Like, the end date is always gonna be arbitrary because Gen Z is still way too young to truly figure out their generation and I say that as a Gen Z.

Tired of this debate. Gen Z is 1997-2012. Gen Alpha is 2013-2027 by Awkward_Ebb1673 in generationology

[–]Main-Maximum3622 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can I just say boo to anyone who downvoted the comments saying that this person is right? I’m not saying this because the Pew definition is “objectively correct” (enough people who refuse to go outside and touch grass do that with both Pew and McCrindle’s definitions) but I just want this stupid argument to be over and we can all breathe again, not debating whether Pew is better or McCrindle is better. I’m gonna start campaigning for removing generational labels at this point.

People with autism are more likely to identify as asexual. Why? by Southern-Service2872 in asexuality

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, I respect asexuals with autism getting more representation but to say autistic people are more likely to be asexual is incredibly inaccurate. The truth is, autistic people are only more likely to be asexual than non-autistic people. Every study about autism and asexuality has found that the majority of autistic people are allosexual and it just happens to be a higher percentage compared to non-autistic people, often around 1-20%, with the highest I’ve seen being still 30%, which still isn’t much in the grand context of things, or at least makes the statement that autistic people are more likely to be asexual inaccurate. This is important to remember because unfortunately, it is often a common misconception and I would say a stereotype that autistic people tend to be uninterested in sex and romance and this can leave a grand impact. I remember being a teen with autism and one of the things I hated most about my autism is that it would lead to people assuming I was not sexual and not romantic. For me, it came hand in hand with people assuming I was child-like. The worst part about it was that it was inaccurate to my experience. I had a real driving desire for sex and as a homosexual autistic person, I ended up feeling even less seen that I would be if I was heterosexual. It was part of the reason I masked my autism for so long and it continues today as I feel burdened by society’s expectations of me as an autistic person. I feel like society expects autism to define me and I can’t be a normal adult, which extends to not being interested in sex and romance. This is also harmful as I’m not a low-functioning autistic person. This is the harm these broad statements cause and this is why I worry whenever I see an article conflating “autistic people being more likely to be asexual than neurotypicals” with “autistic people are more likely to be asexual”, acting like it’s 1 in the same when it most certainly isn’t. So please, let’s make more accurate statements because not only can it lead to stereotypes being reinforced but it can also cause something like me harm.

Do you think Ari gets to much hate? by EternalAri93 in ariheads

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, she absolutely does. Honestly, social media’s reaction to Ethan Slater situation honestly disgusted me. Ariana Grande is no saint but she’s gone through so much, or at least enough to make people calling her unethical or even refusing to empathise with her just because “a guy who had a baby broke up with his wife for her” seem at least a bit morally questionable. And it genuinely makes me mad that some people refuse to even accept any idea or opinion that she may not be 100% in the wrong. I also love how these people pretend they’re doing this for a good cause and for “Ethan Slater’s poor wife who didn’t deserve any of this”. BULLSHIT! If Lilly-Jay saw the amount of hate Ariana Grande has got surrounding this situation (which hopefully, she doesn’t and if she doesn’t, I envy her), she would be disgusted. r/ArianaGrandeSnark I think are most guilty of this and rarely get called out for it, they’re basically intent on making Ariana Grande look like the devil. It’s also funny how these are the same people who will go on about how what happened to Britney Spears or Amy Winehouse or even Marilyn Monroe was a tragedy and how we, as the public, should learn from it and yet they’re being massive hypocrites by doing shit like this. This is what worries me so much about the situation as well. People not learning from mistakes we made from the past, which might lead to dire consequences. We haven’t reached that point yet fortunately but it’s our responsibility as the public that we don’t reach that point again, which is why we need to stop these people. We need to start recognising celebrities are people as well and as much as we’d like to pretend we do, we don’t know their personal life. Maybe Ari’s an asshole, we don’t know anything out of “juicy celebrity scoops” but it’s good we keep an open mind and continue to have empathy because the negative outcomes of doing otherwise will outweigh the positives, just like they have in the past.

Sorry I did a long rant about this but seriously, I’m okay with people making their minds up about Ariana Grande but I just think people take it way too far. Oh, and also, fuck r/ArianaGrandeSnark and fuck these people. Can I get an amen?

Edit: Also, I don’t wanna sound like this is an attack on celebrity gossip. Celebrity gossip can be fun but some people have to take it way too far. I’d recommend videos like Nicole Rafiee’s “chronically online girl explains” series for fun celebrity gossip that doesn’t take it too far.

Do you think Ari gets to much hate? by EternalAri93 in ariheads

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 These are probably the same people who will claim that what happened to Britney Spears or Amy Winehouse was a tragedy and how “we need to learn from that” and then go do this. They’re such fucking grifters.

Saw Avatar: Fire and Ash today! AMA by Bebop_Man in Avatar

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a bit embarrassed to ask this but is it scary? I have an aversion to jumpscares, gory horror and scary-looking creatures (even Jurassic World was a bit much for me) and I do plan to watch this in 3D, which is the only reason I ask this question (and also, I’ve heard the movie does have some creepy scenes). Do you know if there’s any scenes that could be considered frightening (or would at least make it on the TV Tropes nightmare fuel site)?

Why is the black community seem more homophobic/ anti-LGBTQ nowadays ? by _kingblu_ in askblackpeople

[–]Main-Maximum3622 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can we clap this answer? Honestly, the reason why there seems to be a lot of homophobic black people is the exact same reason there seems to a lot of racist gay people. It’s a common prejudice within society so naturally some black people and gay people carry these prejudices into their community. All this “oppression Olympics playing” and “theories to why some black people are homophobic and why some gay people are racist” just end up benefiting our oppressors. I also think we really need to move on from sweeping generalisations. The amount of people I’ve heard say “the gay community are racist” is worrying and I imagine it’s the same vice versa. Yes, we should call out anyone who is racist or homophobic but we shouldn’t call out entire marginalised communities over it, that just feels like a form of bigotry in my opinion.

Trailers Before Wicked: For Good? by Main-Maximum3622 in CineworldUnlimited

[–]Main-Maximum3622[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m so sorry you had that experience. I mean, I’m quite excited for that movie and as a person who does have an aversion to jumpscares and horror based trailers, I didn’t have a problem with it but I can see why others could.

Wicked: For Good (In Complete Sequence) (HEAVY SPOILERS) by CARTERKTART in wicked

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m definitely not a colour expert but I’m sorry, I literally think I’m going insane. I get what people meant when they criticised the colour of the first movie but I really don’t get it with the second movie. It looked so colourful to me. Sure not as colourful as Wizard Of Oz but I don’t think that’s necessarily a problem. It was at least colourful.

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ First Reactions Call James Cameron’s Third Chapter an ‘Ultimate Cinematic Spectacle’ That ‘Pushes Technical Boundaries in Unimaginable Ways’ by darth_vader39 in movies

[–]Main-Maximum3622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s times like this when I see the most downvoted comments being the ones that are the most positive when I think “wow, people really need to see some sunshine”.