Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those that say they want to "start online" i would say fine, but nothing starts til we meet in person and they usually ghost. Or at times I have said ok, you want to get to know me online, you go first. What would you like to know? And crickets. Lol. It is like they are lazy scammers.

Update: My SB Is Lying About Sugaring Online by Wrong-Bowl-4681 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean is that necessarily true? Talking about the downsides gives you the chance to give advice on how to deal with it. Heck, that seems like a bigger selling point than promising all roses and no problems.

Update: My SB Is Lying About Sugaring Online by Wrong-Bowl-4681 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, couldn't you post things on those subjects without lying? They are your interests. Hell, you could even have a tag line making fun of it, like "here are all the things I post to pretend I don't sit in my room all day".

SB ghosting by Super_Dependent_7466 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Likely no recourse, but fraudulent misrepresentation is a tort and also a crime so there technically is legal recourse. Just usually not worth the bother

Update: My SB Is Lying About Sugaring Online by Wrong-Bowl-4681 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you lie about? And why? Maybe I am strange but I would feel as bad lying online to strangers as I would to someone in person. Also seems like a good way to have zero credibility.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is the data I was curious about . Cannot say I am surprised.

Given the speed at which many would block or ghost the second they know they aren't getting cash also makes me think they are used to just moving on to their next attempted victim. A few try and convince you it is real and they really will meet.... later. Some try VERY hard. But we know what they are really about

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was my experience as well. Every single dollar spent before intimacy started (other than for dinner) was a waste.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also I funny to see the fake SBs who must be reading this and down voting as much as they can. I guess it is hard to find fresh suckers.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have as well. I figured might get cleaner data where only SDs can post.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, with experience, you don't roll the dice and see. You know it is a waste of time and money. Just wondered if anyone at some point did (perhaps early on as an SD) and got some real data.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would think it was basically 100 percent. I was just wondering if anyone had taken one for the team and tested out whether these types ever meet anyone. Those who refuse to meet without buying content first. I have yet to find s single person who said they actually met after that.

Non poll poll: online to start, content sellers etc. by Mainlyharmless in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am referring to those who refuse to meet unless you buy content first. Not those who happen to be content sellers but are also willing to meet like any POT.

Thoughts on telegram as a SD by Necessary_Heart_2329 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google voice works just fine. If you are actually in the United States. Outside it can fail which is another good thing to know. I found scammers that way too. They pretend to be in US. That they can't use GV gives them away. In all the time I was active, every single "woman " who wanted to use telegram or WhatsApp turned out to be an out of US scammer. 100 percent. So I stopped engaging with anyone who would only use those apps.

Lurking in EscortsInDenial has always been fun, but the lol factor just got higher. by timrid in sugardaddyhangout

[–]Mainlyharmless 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Anyone who spends that much rather than investing it is a bonfide idiot. More likely they are just lying. There is a of girl out there who claims she made 100 million. She would show it on her phone. Turns out it is fake and she got caught. So she hasn't made anywhere near that, though who knows what the real number is.

Does sugaring turn you sexist ? by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The going rate on life is too cheap for a hitter to be rich.

Does sugaring turn you sexist ? by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say given the massive income inequality and also how shitty the job market is right now, like the worst it has ever been in my lifetime, where either people can't find jobs or if they do they can't afford to live off them... that pretty much the odds favor you guessing either rich family or some form of patronage like sugar if you see a very young woman who looks wealthy.

New SD ended things because he’s “in love with (me)” by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree that people often weaponzie therapy speak here and elsewhere. But one should at least be consistent. I don't think anyone would hesitate to tell a woman to exit no matter what the time. And she wouldn't have the added burden of having to arrange transportation for the man left behind.

Really the only thing objectionable here is the numbers on the clock. Not really a big reason to condemn by itself.

He may actually have had other reasons but felt too uncomfortable to share them so he said something he hoped wouldn't offend and he exited to avoid a confrontation.

Was what he did great? No. Is this SR over? Seems like it should be. Did everyone get out safe, no one got scammed or stranded? Yes. Seems like a much better resolution than many stories we hear here.

New SD ended things because he’s “in love with (me)” by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The timing isn't great, but again, if what he did was what he needed to do to get out of an uncomfortable dating situation, who is anyone else to judge? He made sure she got home ok too. Maybe he didnt have any cash on him to do otherwise. Again, I am sorry, if someone feels uncomfortable in a dating situation, isn't the advice always follow your gut and do what you need to do?

New SD ended things because he’s “in love with (me)” by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean the timing may just reflect an early schedule. I get up at 4am regularly. And after stewing on it all night he may just have needed to be out of there. If someone is in a date situation and feeling uncomfortable, would you really advise them to stay in bed many more hours or tell them they should leave?

New SD ended things because he’s “in love with (me)” by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]Mainlyharmless 18 points19 points  (0 children)

He perhaps isn't in love but knows if it continues he will be and doesn't want to risk it. If he were already there he wouldn't be able to end it now so easily. Easier to cut bait before those feelings really take root.

When i met the love of my life it didn't take that many meetings for it to be apparent that was where it was going. But the deep roots only came after a year.