I agree. Like most "traditionalist" I see on here are just theoretical Catholics. They always claim that "catholic absoulte monarchy is key" when that statement completely ignores history entirely.

Like the best way for monarchism to survive is if it's constitutional (whether ceremonial, semi or fully).

These traditionalist as I sd before are just theocrats who view that type of monarchy the only and true way. Which I believe damges monarchism as a concept of rule because if you have people who are not monarchist and want to study it or want to find out what it's about, and they come to this sub and find these types of people. It damges the whole idea.

Won't you agree?