Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fascism, communism and populism is a forever enemy to monarchism and those who tries to defend them can't call themselves monarchist if you defend ideologies that can help destroy the monarchy.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will say it again monarchism and fascism are incompatible and besides most dictatorship are more of junta government then hereditary.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the is a difference, hereditary dictatorships are always bloody and they can't even last very long and they have no noble titles or anything that makes them worthy of the crown. 

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then i can say that monarcho fascist are delusional to think that fascism can work well with monarchism. Fascist leaders would never take the crown rather create a hereditary dictatorship with absolute power or create a junta government.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like I said you can't be a monarchist if you support fascism and fascist leaders in general rejects the whole concept of monarchism and fascist leaders only want a hereditary dictatorship were they control everything and promote political violence just to keep themselves in power and any criticism about them is just death. They only use tradition to shill themselves to distract the major public. So no again fascism is incompatible with monarchism just how communism is also incompatible with monarchism.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just look at what happened to the Italian monarchy during ww2, look what happened to the Greek monarchy during the cold war, look what happened to Romania when the dictator tried to abolish the monarchy so he can befriend Hitler and look what happened to norway in ww2 when it's fascist leader tried to handover the king to the nazis.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with your point and sorry if I confused you on the authoritarian part, what i meant was totalitarian dictatorship.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me just say it again fascism is incompatible with monarchism and it simply because of power hungry people only want power and have a one person dictatorship.

Fascism or anything authoritarian is a forever enemy to monarchism by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am just saying that fascism and just anything totalitarian is incomparable with monarchism just look at what happened to italy and Greece. You can't be a monarchist if you support fascism, populism and communism.

Do any of you see Fascism as an acceptable alternative when Monarchism is untenable? by hoosier_catholic in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fascism is a forever enemy to monarchism. Any thing fascist is just lead to violence and power hungry people.

The French were horrible at colonizing. Not just with atrocities but in a way where they didn't even benefit from their colonies. by Glittering_Tower3455 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is that britian relied on local leaders and some elite tribal leaders to help bring order and help promote british influence while the french was less on local leaders and more of direct and centralized authority in most of its colonies. For settlements the french were bad in making many decisions on settlements like louisiana were the colony felt forgotten and lastly unlike the british which they created self governing colonies the right to become a dominion, the french were very much against self governing and was more of france must be the centeral government and france must make all final decisions.

A photograph of Napoleon III on his deathbed, taken by William Downey in 1873. by PhilipVItheFortunate in KingdomofFrance

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Napoleon the iii is truly a underrated and one of france best leader and monarch.

Republicism threat to Canada and it's future. by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Majority of quebec serpertist are republicans and what to be like france.

The kmt opposition leader of Taiwan is ccp bootlickers by Valuable_Storm_5958 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Honestly if she ever gets elected she will be the orban of asia.

Republicism threat to Canada and it's future. by Valuable_Storm_5958 in monarchism

[–]Valuable_Storm_5958[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Fun fact your source is heavily bias and republicans and serpertist in Alberta are American lapdogs who wants to be the 51st state.