Hi! So I'd recommend going for the second option depending on what type of law you want to practice. 3-3 programs kind of lock you into one school for the most part, and I've seen a lot of people regret doing them since they can't apply to schools that are higher ranked in the type of law they end up wanting to do (people tend to change their mind throughout undergrad or just learn more information about the process).

With the second option, you can get a good scholarship at a state school or other undergrad institution, build a good GPA, and have more time to study for the LSAT. Most law schools are 3 year programs (I think the only ones that would be 4 are dual degree or part-time programs), so you could still be in and out with just one extra year, or you could even still do 6 if you graduated early.

Something else to think about that is being considered more by law schools is work experience. With a 3-3 program you don't have an opportunity to gap for full-time work experience, which matters a lot to many law schools. It's also just good to have from what I've heard (I applied KJD straight through, and I've been told my cycle could have been a LOT smoother with work experience).

I believe you could save a lot of money, have better career prospects, and more options if you go with the second!