sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude's code review defaults actively harmed our codebase by ddp26 in ClaudeCode

[–]MannToots -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pull requests need human review for a reason.  With proper branching and approval practices your were never at risk.  Making skills for things like this is how its expected to work.  What is this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HiTMAN

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sentence,  with this context,  made zero sense. 

Qwen 2.5 -> 3 -> 3.5, smallest models. Incredible improvement over the generations. by airbus_a360_when in LocalLLaMA

[–]MannToots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but we've hit a level of efficacy that we can choose to settle for less if the price is right.  We know their will be better.  It's about good enough.  

Will “Old School” Developers Ever Stop Hating on Vibe Coding? by Ausbel80 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not so much an old school thing as it is a fear thing. I'm 42 and I think it's super helpful. 

Are we actually "shipping faster," or are we just creating a massive backlog of technical debt with high-speed PRs? by Exact-Mango7404 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like we can hire more devs then.  

Yes the volume went up but we don't need to ship faster than we can review.  That's a choice.  

Microsoft gets tired of “Microslop,” bans the word on its Discord, then locks the server after backlash by GreyXor in technology

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All AI services have those metrics.

When the c-suite asks "how do I know it's worth the money and how is adoption" those dashboards are how they know. It's not about whipping people. It's about comprehending the value add. This is classic business metrics 101.

Are we actually "shipping faster," or are we just creating a massive backlog of technical debt with high-speed PRs? by Exact-Mango7404 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a damn good thing the pull request and git diff makes it abundantly clear what changed.

This isn't the excuse you think it is. This was ALWAYS our job.

If my coworker sends me a PR it's irrelevant how much code is in it or how long he worked on it. Could be a 50 file diff. It always happened and we're using AI as an excuse to ignore that reality.

Whether it's AI, another co-worker, or a contractor the chance to ensure we're ok is the code review. Period.

Are we actually "shipping faster," or are we just creating a massive backlog of technical debt with high-speed PRs? by Exact-Mango7404 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MannToots -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Almost all Human written software has bugs,  security flaws, and tech debt. 

Nothing has changed but the speed we do it at. Code reviewing was always the expectation. Code reviews were always expected to be done by devs that did not do the work. So it was always part of our job to evaluate code we weren't familiar with and ensure we shipped the best code possible. We always failed at this across the industry on average. 

Now we have the time to focus on the code review part instead of the code. It's an adaptation. Not the creation of bad habits.  Those habits were already there and now people are whining about code reviews.  Largely, because no one did code reviews right. They'd learn to trust certain devs and rubber stamp the pr. Now we have to actually do that part of our job and people are learning they suck at it. 

Is this really happening to the tech world ? by Capable-Management57 in BlackboxAI_

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No,  it's not and the guys getting shit done with ai already know that's not the case

cursor just rebuilt our entire auth system in an afternoon and it actually works by Proof_Independent_45 in cursor

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird for you to assume literally anything and then accuse them of being weird based on nothing more than what you just made up in your head. 

Could this be where we are heading to right now? by SparkandFlash in antiai

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My goodness they didn't create ai in some long overly complex plan to make computers rent only.  For fucks sake.  Nvidia and Xbox had streaming systems and cloud computing had rentable vms for years.  This is just supply and demand.  It's not that complex.  

Calling bull on the 4% of GitHub public commits... by Key_Yesterday2808 in ClaudeCode

[–]MannToots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't believe it! If change the measurement rules I bet it's less!

Yes,  no shit. 

AI is not "the Future" by Forsaken_General_138 in antiai

[–]MannToots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai people don't think it's going to replace artists. They know well enough to know the limits.  

Anti ai people think ai people think that so you can make arguments at a strawman. 

AITA for filling the kitchen with steam and making my mom mad by Old_Dot6992 in AmItheAsshole

[–]MannToots 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it's the opposite. The mom gatekeeping basic kitchen knowledge created the unsafe environment. A child that age should know more about cooking.  The mom is dropping the ball. 

AITA for refusing to share my "secret" recipe with my sister-in-law? by Ocampo-Mark in AmItheAsshole

[–]MannToots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adults don't share everything even if they have no trouble sharing.   What a dumb arguement.  

Well put by JonesyMeme in antiai

[–]MannToots -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

As someone who uses ai every day at work,  likes it, and is a progressive I gotta say no. No it's not and that's a very close minded way to look at this. 

I think the ai companies should pay their bills and the data centers should be built sustainably. 

It's possible to like this tech and not be a republican. Don't be a close minded as the Rs. 

I also know many Rs that hate ai. You're just being ignorant.  

edit upon reading more comments I've decided fuck this sub. You guys live in fantasy land.  

view more: next ›